Right wingers...regarding Orlando tragedy....you have a tough choice to make

Status
Not open for further replies.
The guy had an AR-15 and had to be carrying a bag with hundreds of rounds of ammunition. Did he walk right in or did he shoot his way in?
You're the one claiming you know what happened, so you tell me.
Why did the massacre occur?

1. Radical Islam
2. Extreme hatred of gays
3. A person with noted terrorist leanings, extreme anti-gay hatred, domestic abuse and anger issues being able to buy any gun he wants
3. Unlimited access to an assault type rifle and high capacity magazines
4. No screening of patrons entering the nightclub
 
One might think that a terrible event like this would unite Americans, but one would be wrong.

It is clear that something is wrong within Islam, that some of its adherents think murdering innocents is their religious calling.

Why did the massacre occur?

1. Radical Islam
2. Extreme hatred of gays
3. A person with noted terrorist leanings, extreme anti-gay hatred, domestic abuse and anger issues being able to buy any gun he wants
3. Unlimited access to an assault type rifle and high capacity magazines
4. No screening of patrons entering the nightclub
How many people in America have access to the weapons used by this subhuman? A lot, right? You lefties are always bitching about guns, yet this incident was the largest mass shooting in history. As such, it is not guns that are the problem. If you were capable of thinking logically, you would agree that this incident was Islamic terrorism and that IS the problem.

Hundred people shot, Fifty dead

No big deal.....we don't have to worry until there are thousands being killed
Says the guy advocating disarming all law-biding American citizens.

You know, every time you post is a lie since you are obviously lying about being a "rightwinger".
Huh? Who says someone's name is necessarily announcing who they are? For the record, I am not a faun, despite the name.
Yes, and I'm not really a kamikaze pilot, but are you denying he chose that specific name for non-political reasons?
 
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,


No, it's the left that needs to chose between the safety of Americans and defending radical Muslims. Obama's FBI gave this guy a background check and he passed. Muslims do seem to get a pass with this administration and that is the problem here.

If the guy didn't have a gun, he could have bombed the bar or set it on fire. Or he could have flown a plane into the building or drove a truck with explosives into the building.

Can we for once address the core problem, which is radical Islamists who target infidels, especially gays? A radical Imam told followers in an Orlando mosque that gays must die. Stop blaming the method used and focus on the mindset that believes people should be murdered in the name of their religion.
 
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,


No, it's the left that needs to chose between the safety of Americans and defending radical Muslims. Obama's FBI gave this guy a background check and he passed. Muslims do seem to get a pass with this administration and that is the problem here.

If the guy didn't have a gun, he could have bombed the bar or set it on fire. Or he could have flown a plane into the building or drove a truck with explosives into the building.

Can we for once address the core problem, which is radical Islamists who target infidels, especially gays? A radical Imam told followers in an Orlando mosque that gays must die. Stop blaming the method used and focus on the mindset that believes people should be murdered in the name of their religion.


I agree with you we must address the CORE PROBLEM - the elephant in the room

The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT beginning will Truman supplied the Muslims the MOTIVATION to place WE THE PEOPLE in harms way





.
 
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,





False choice - of course.
 
That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?

Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

So, it's apparently fact. Do what you want with the info.
It is apparently a fact that you are blaming the weapon.

Do what you want with the info.

I don't think it's possible to only blame the weapon, that doesn't' make sense. To ignore the weapons effectiveness is asinine.
I'm not ignoring the weapons effectiveness.

Again! He was a known radical. The Government failed in their responsibility.

The weapon was manufactured for the effectiveness.

You choose to curtail my rights instead of addressing the individual.

The guy is a terrorist and he chose to use the tool that is most effective. Nobody is ignoring who the guy is, you're deflecting.
The guy was a "known" potential terrorists. DHS apparently cleared him for a concealed carry.

No deflection. He was armed and recently purchased said weapons. My reply stands. So. He recently purchased weapons.

What does it have to do with my firearms and should my rights be curtailed due to his actions?
 
13419208_1080297012006165_2172779440492555671_n.png
 
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

We need a "stupid" rating.

This one would have a thousand.
 
Can we for once address the core problem, which is radical Islamists who target infidels, especially gays? A radical Imam told followers in an Orlando mosque that gays must die. Stop blaming the method used and focus on the mindset that believes people should be murdered in the name of their religion.


IDIOT.......We are blaming the madman........But here's what your half brain can NEVER address.

Its STUPID to state that we should just focus on the mindset...that is a virtually EMPTY focus since mindsets are determined by how YOUR candidate talks about Muslims and how we seem to love to invade and occupy Muslim countries......

That given, then we sane citizens ask for YOUR ilk to help in stopping the ready availability of purchasing military style weapons on the open market.
 
.If Islamists (according to your racist and xenophobic mentality) are at war with us.....it is your screwed up policies that are actually helping to ARM them.

No, our government is. With taxpayer dollars. Plus, Islam is not a race but a religion. Gun control policies only further aggravate the situation by limiting what law abiding people can do to defend themselves. If some guy comes in a nightclub and starts mowing people down, what're you gonna do, choke him with your shoestrings?
 
Last edited:
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

Last time I looked, you don't get to make the offer of choices. So, fuck off since you think you do.
 
Its STUPID to state that we should just focus on the mindset

The mind drives the man. That's the problem you're seeming to have, the gun doesn't drive the man, it doesn't compel him to do anything. What's in his twisted mind does. He is the one who chooses to pick up the weapon and use it. He alone possesses the desire to kill, his weapon does not. His weapon is an emotionless, inanimate object with no will or desires of its own. The man is not. Only the insanity/hatred in his mind drives hid desire to kill.

You can't seem to grasp that.
 
Last edited:
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,
They should've armed themselves...
 
Nope. We have too many laws that infringe on gun rights. We need to be getting rid of more of these laws. That gun didn't kill anyone. It was used by an Islamic terrorist that hates americans. No, your left wing party needs to acknowledge these islamic murderers.


It is fuck heads like you that present a serious problem within the American citizenry.....

NO ONE, moron, is defending Islamic murderers...NO ONE.....The facts that they ARE among us and have ease in buying ANY weapon of their choosing with YOUR blessing, is the fucking problem.

Sure you are. You're trying to deflect from Islamic terrorism so you can justify gun control and save the candidacy of your scumbag nominee.
 
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,
By using the words "assault weapon" your creditability with those who know firearms drops to less than zero.

I don't know how you define an assault weapon, but whatever he used sure seemed to function like one.

There's no such thing as an "assault weapon." The military uses something called an "assault rifle," but what the bloodthirsty muzzie savage used for his mass shooting doesn't fit the description.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top