Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
- Aug 5, 2010
- 42,407
- 7,739
Let's face it the far left only has three issues that they think they can nail the other side with and this one of them.
It is the far left way to force others to believe as they do.
As I have pointed out on other threads "marriage" (in the eyes of the church) is a religious bond. ANd thus belongs to religion. However Civil Unions are far more legally binding than marriage.
So if people want to enter a Civil Union it has not8hing to do with religion and is far more legally binding.
Let the church have their "marriage" and that way things can truly progress. The church is scared that the government will force them to perform and accept gay "marriage" (and rightful so given the actions of the far left) and thus causes the problem.
If the far left was not so hell bent on forcing religion to accept this then maybe this would not be such a hot button issue for the far left. However they know they can push button with one of three topics and that is all they have left these days.
So who is against Civil Unions being in place of "Marriage"?
Great! I'm all for it. The thing is, it has to apply to you too. It can't be legal marriage for the straights, civil unions for the gheys.
I am married and in a civil union so I am fine with it. I know you are not, but hey don't let that far left hatred stand in your way.
That's where you're wrong. I'm perfectly fine with Civil Unions. I'm not fine with separate but equal. Marriage for straights and civil unions for gays is the definition of separate but equal and in case you weren't aware, that was declared unconstitutional.