Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
As an individual, he can only do that for his individual self and property. No one hired him and he was not ordered to secure the area by his chain of command.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
Persons died. It should be about homicide.So far the left is trying to make a case for a misdemeanor citation and that's all.
He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
LOLLOLOLSTOP SPAMMING THE FUCKING THREAD!
Some one made a point about Rittenhouse being in violation of a gun law.
I pointed out a way of looking at it, that could be argued that he was NOT in violation.
A certain asshole, keeps making a stupid response.
I don't want my brilliant post buried by a dumb comment from a drooling retard, so I keep reposting my point.
People have a right to see and read my ideas. NOt to have them buried by a retarded leftie.
You keep posting the exact same thing over and over while expecting a different result. You do know what that defines, don'tcha?
I was making a valid point. YOu were the one acting like a retarded faggot.
Actually, you ridiculously claimed you "dismissed" me. Proven factually false since you kept repeating you were dismissing me. No one has to dismiss the same thing more than once unless they're really just bluffing, as you were.
And it matters not if he was being a tidy little boy scout. He illegally obtained a gun and then used it to shoot someone in the back. He's going to prison for a loooong time.
Persons died. It should be about homicide.So far the left is trying to make a case for a misdemeanor citation and that's all.
Grandma claimed Pancho Villa was creating a ruckus and there was railroad work to be had.As an individual, he can only do that for his individual self and property. No one hired him and he was not ordered to secure the area by his chain of command.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
And that mindset is why Mexico is still a Third World shit hole that you moved out of to come here, to a society built by people like Rittenhouse.
He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
Extenuating circumstances? He could be home with no worries instead of being so proactive.Persons died. It should be about homicide.So far the left is trying to make a case for a misdemeanor citation and that's all.
Self defense is moral and legal. That he was arrested at all, is a massive injustice.
Not as an individual person of the people. Well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of our free States.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
Not as an individual person of the people. Well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of our free States.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
Extenuating circumstances? He could be home with no worries instead of being so proactive.Persons died. It should be about homicide.So far the left is trying to make a case for a misdemeanor citation and that's all.
Self defense is moral and legal. That he was arrested at all, is a massive injustice.
He was not enrolled militia. All he proved was how worthless to the security of our free States he was, by helping cause the incident which lead him to homicide some persons.Not as an individual person of the people. Well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of our free States.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
He was there with a group. You silly word games do not change that.
He was not enrolled militia. All he proved was how worthless to the security of our free States he was, by helping cause the incident which lead him to homicide some persons.Not as an individual person of the people. Well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of our free States.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
He was there with a group. You silly word games do not change that.
LOLThe business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
LOLLOLLOLOLSTOP SPAMMING THE FUCKING THREAD!
Some one made a point about Rittenhouse being in violation of a gun law.
I pointed out a way of looking at it, that could be argued that he was NOT in violation.
A certain asshole, keeps making a stupid response.
I don't want my brilliant post buried by a dumb comment from a drooling retard, so I keep reposting my point.
People have a right to see and read my ideas. NOt to have them buried by a retarded leftie.
You keep posting the exact same thing over and over while expecting a different result. You do know what that defines, don'tcha?
I was making a valid point. YOu were the one acting like a retarded faggot.
Actually, you ridiculously claimed you "dismissed" me. Proven factually false since you kept repeating you were dismissing me. No one has to dismiss the same thing more than once unless they're really just bluffing, as you were.
And it matters not if he was being a tidy little boy scout. He illegally obtained a gun and then used it to shoot someone in the back. He's going to prison for a loooong time.
1. I don't care to discuss the semantics of "dismiss" with you.
2. The point being discussed was one about his supposed violation of a law. I addressed that supposed violation. And now after ridiculing my point for multiple posts, you want to change the subject? That is you admitting that my point was valid.
3. For a want a be cop, actually maintaining order in a riot, would be "educational".
He also chose to buy a weapon that could not legally be sold to him.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
"He did not make that mob attack him. Those people are responsible for their own actions."He was not enrolled militia. All he proved was how worthless to the security of our free States he was, by helping cause the incident which lead him to homicide some persons.Not as an individual person of the people. Well regulated militia are expressly declared necessary not optional to the security of our free States.He should not have been there to begin with. He could have been providing support to firefighters instead.The business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
He chose to be there, to protect his community from a violent and murderous mob.
That you find that bad behavior, is why Mexico is the kind of place that people like you leave, to come to a place built by people like Rittenhouse.
He was there with a group. You silly word games do not change that.
He did not make that mob attack him. Those people are responsible for their own actions.
That you blame the target of the attack, the would be victim, shows that you are right to side with the vile left, because that is the type of vile shit they always do.
LOLThe business owner didn't ask him to. Just because he decided to play Rambo doesn't mean he's allowed to.He should have stayed home. All he did was prove the worthlessness of the unorganized militia regarding the security of our free States.
He protected the building and himself. That the government arrested him for it, is not an argument against teh Militia, but against the corrupt government.
He stood up to a violent mob, protecting a building and himself.
That is not a man "playing Rambo".
That is a man standing up for his community and doing it well.
That the government found it to be cause to arrest him, is a sign of how fucked up we are as a nation.
It's not his community. His community is in another state.
The actual community didn't ask him to defend their property, which is illegal to use lethal force to defend.
He was rightfully charged with murder after shooting someone in the back.
