Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asked and answered. Read.You asked me a question? Where?
Regardless, what part of the bolded part confuses you? But, since you ARE confused, yes.
Is the picture/caption racist? A simple question, no?
It's pure liberal hypocrisy, they're quick to call conservatives racist while employing racial stereotypes, which in my opinion makes them more of a racist than those they accuse.
Says the man who found nothing wrong about repealing a law that made it no longer a crime to be an interracial couple and married. That and you found nothing wrong with calling the mixing of races a crime.
So either you're a racist or ignorant while sprouting off on things you don't know about.
Which is it?
And you're an idiot, but you knew that huh? Nowhere have I stated the desire to repeal Loving v. Virginia, nor have I stated that mixing of races should be a crime. I simply stated my opinion that the image provided wasn't racist.
Obviously you don't (or can't) read. Asked and answered. Don't be lazy, read.Asked and answered. Read.Is the picture/caption racist? A simple question, no?
I read quite well...you talk about "a picture". I want to make absolutely sure that you are referring to the picture/caption in the OP.
....
I have to wonder what kind of rationale allows one to think that just because a picture is racist means it's OK to be racist, too. Then I remember that I'm dealing with morons whenever that happens.
It's pure liberal hypocrisy, they're quick to call conservatives racist while employing racial stereotypes, which in my opinion makes them more of a racist than those they accuse.
you mean a racial stereotype like a black man eating fried chicken? huh?
hey, maybe you are on to something. follow that bread crumb trail
Lonestar: Should the RNC mod of that page have left the image up, or were they correct in removing it?
do not see the homosexual rights issue as a civil rights issue. Do you not discuss this with your colored friends?
Colored Friends?
True. And those same freedoms allow others to call it racist, as it is.Lonestar: Should the RNC mod of that page have left the image up, or were they correct in removing it?
It'a free country they had the choice of doing either.
In general, it's not these days. Historically, it had been.It's pure liberal hypocrisy, they're quick to call conservatives racist while employing racial stereotypes, which in my opinion makes them more of a racist than those they accuse.
you mean a racial stereotype like a black man eating fried chicken? huh?
hey, maybe you are on to something. follow that bread crumb trail
Hoenstly I don't see a racial stereotype in a black man eating chicken.
"Since the Civil War traditional slave foods like fried chicken, watermelon, and chitterlings, have suffered a strong association with African American stereotypes and blackface minstrelry. This was commercialized for the first half of the 20th century by restaurants like Sambo's and Coon Chicken Inn, which selected exaggerated blacks as mascots, implying quality by their association with the stereotype. While acknowledged positively as soul food in the modern age by many, the affinity that African American culture has for fried chicken has been considered a delicate, often pejorative issue; While still present, this perception has been fading for several decades with the ubiquitous nature of fried chicken dishes in the US and a gradual ageing and dull acceptation of this stereotype.[5][6][7][8]"
It's pure liberal hypocrisy, they're quick to call conservatives racist while employing racial stereotypes, which in my opinion makes them more of a racist than those they accuse.
you mean a racial stereotype like a black man eating fried chicken? huh?
hey, maybe you are on to something. follow that bread crumb trail
Hoenstly I don't see a racial stereotype in a black man eating chicken.
When you're ready to pay seven bucks a gallon for gas.Care to explain how that picture is racist?
Typical comment from a dumb Texan. When are you guys going to form your own country and get lost????
Of course it's a free country.Lonestar: Should the RNC mod of that page have left the image up, or were they correct in removing it?
It'a free country they had the choice of doing either.
True. But if they secede, the price of gas among other things, will increase. I find those who call for secession or who want to secede, irrespective of state, idiotic anyway. We are the USA. I suppose I'm just a damn Yankee at heart.When you're ready to pay seven bucks a gallon for gas.Typical comment from a dumb Texan. When are you guys going to form your own country and get lost????
We all know that Texas is not the only place to get petroleum products.
Actually, Barry makes a perfect poster boy for what happens with mixed race kids. Father leaves before he is 2, raised by Mother who tries another race and finally gives the kid to her parents to raise. The kid is given all of the trappings of a wealthy little white boy and grows up to be an angry adult that only identifies with his father's race, all while throwing the woman (that was kind enough to provide his ungrateful ass a life)under the bus as soon as it was politically handy. Now uses the race of father he never knew to become the historic first "black" President in history.
What is the result if you are the white woman.......... stuck with a goofy kid that doesn't fit in anywhere, holds his mother and grandparents responsible for no relationship with his deadbeat dad, grows up with a giant chip on his shoulder that makes him hate half of who he is, gets immersed in drugs, becomes an anarchist and then makes deals with numerous devils to get into college, the state senate and finally the Presidency. He is now in a position to fuck up the country and people he hates........... all because his white mama fucked a stinking African.
It was a tough one, what with so many choices...but I nominate the above for the Most Revealing Post of the Day Award.
Congratulations sitty.
True. And those same freedoms allow others to call it racist, as it is.Lonestar: Should the RNC mod of that page have left the image up, or were they correct in removing it?
It'a free country they had the choice of doing either.
I agree with you that there have been way to many calls of faux-racism from the left. But, the faux-racism calls do effectively marginalize the impact of the fight against true racism. This is such a case.True. And those same freedoms allow others to call it racist, as it is.It'a free country they had the choice of doing either.
I would agree that people are free to call whatever they please racist, those on the left seem to do that quite often. The fact remains that the majority of people choose to engage in relationships within their own race which suggest that they don't believe in miscegenation. And to call them racist for their beliefs is beyond the pale.
Of course it's a free country.Lonestar: Should the RNC mod of that page have left the image up, or were they correct in removing it?
It'a free country they had the choice of doing either.
But I wanted to know your opinion of it. Please answer.
Should they or should they not have?
I agree with you that there have been way to many calls of faux-racism from the left. But, the faux-racism calls do effectively marginalize the impact of the fight against true racism. This is such a case.True. And those same freedoms allow others to call it racist, as it is.
I would agree that people are free to call whatever they please racist, those on the left seem to do that quite often. The fact remains that the majority of people choose to engage in relationships within their own race which suggest that they don't believe in miscegenation. And to call them racist for their beliefs is beyond the pale.
They reap the consequences of not being believed on one of the few times when they actually have it right.
