RNC keeps racist pics on Facebook for nearly a week

[saveliberty]

Is the picture racist? No. Add the caption below the picture. Yes it is, it is racist. The caption takes you back to a place in time where blacks eating chicken was a racist symbol. Not to mention the caption itself. I ask that conservatives on this board join me in condeming this inclusion on the RNC website. It will give credibility where both sides need it desperately.

Better focus: Who put it there? Why did it take so long to correct the problem?

 

[paperview]

Good Lord! Do try to keep up! I am referring to the Danish cartoon thing.

Let's see, you mention the MoveOn thing, and most of us think of the vile Betrayus rhetoric. Your short term memory issues must be quite the handicap in real life, too. Perhaps that is the reason for your lack of character.

ah, once again you cannot follow but cannot refrain from displaying it. sweet. insults come in handy then, hahaha

Pretty damn hilarious. Dog face castigates Bod for not reading - then can't even follow the freakin thread. Betrayus had nothing to do with the Move-on user generated ad mentioned a number of times here:


http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654587-post42.html

It wasn't that long ago the RNC railed into MoveOn.org because they had "political hate speech" in their user-generated content, that being a contest in which posters submitted an ad.
Gillespie, the RNC chair denounced it roundly. All the talkies and barkers high and low screamed. It was offensive, but it certainly wasn't the DNC doing it, in fact, as I recall it was denounced by most of the dem players, including DNC chair at the time.

It was a big story.

You would think after that, the RNC would be a leettle more sensitive to what users post on their site.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654779-post90.html

They were left there for 6 days.

The RNC had a cow when Moveon.org did not remove offensive user generated content from their site, as well as remarks from other talkers and GOP spokescritters about KOS, and other dem related sites.

And none of those were arms of the DNC. This is an extension of the RNC. They really should police their content.

Or maybe...like some other mouth-breathers here, they saw nothing offensive about it.

Hard to say....

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1657005-post207.html

Now, as we all know, MoveOn.org held a user submission contest several years ago where someone uploaded a video comparing Bush to Hitler. It was taken down after about 30 minutes, but is still a part of conservative lore to this day as something MoveOn ran.

So...why does the RNC a.) oppose interracial marriage, b.) believe in the chicken-eating stereotype of black Americans and c.) think you can "repeal" a Supreme Court decision?

insults come in handy then

Insults are her stock and trade. Everybody has to have something, I suppose.

 

[Si modo]

Let's see, you mention the MoveOn thing, and most of us think of the vile Betrayus rhetoric. Your short term memory issues must be quite the handicap in real life, too. Perhaps that is the reason for your lack of character.

ah, once again you cannot follow but cannot refrain from displaying it. sweet. insults come in handy then, hahaha

Pretty damn hilarious. Dog face castigates Bod for not reading - then can't even follow the freakin thread. Betrayus had nothing to do with the Move-on user generated ad mentioned a number of times here:


http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654587-post42.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654779-post90.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1657005-post207.html

Now, as we all know, MoveOn.org held a user submission contest several years ago where someone uploaded a video comparing Bush to Hitler. It was taken down after about 30 minutes, but is still a part of conservative lore to this day as something MoveOn ran.

So...why does the RNC a.) oppose interracial marriage, b.) believe in the chicken-eating stereotype of black Americans and c.) think you can "repeal" a Supreme Court decision?

insults come in handy then

Insults are her stock and trade. Everybody has to have something, I suppose.

And, your 'quality' of input is usually focused on your object of obsession at the moment. You are quite unstable and quite disturbed. I'm surprised the institution where you surely must reside allows you internet access. Kathaksung does get his access, so it's highly possible your institution gives it to you, as well.

 

[paperview]

Is the picture racist? No. Add the caption below the picture. Yes it is, it is racist. The caption takes you back to a place in time where blacks eating chicken was a racist symbol. Not to mention the caption itself. I ask that conservatives on this board join me in condeming this inclusion on the RNC website. It will give credibility where both sides need it desperately.

Better focus: Who put it there? Why did it take so long to correct the problem?

A voice of reason. Well said.


To date, there have been few conservatives who have condemned the image. A few can't even see the racism. Others just want to make excuses. One here even calls bringing attention to it 'race baiting' and flings around the word Fatwah, like much monkey poo. Another blames miscegenation for the existence of Obama and his mom, who "screwed a stinky African."

It's been quite a revealing thread, indeed.

 

[L.K.Eder]

ah, once again you cannot follow but cannot refrain from displaying it. sweet. insults come in handy then, hahaha

Pretty damn hilarious. Dog face castigates Bod for not reading - then can't even follow the freakin thread. Betrayus had nothing to do with the Move-on user generated ad mentioned a number of times here:


http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654587-post42.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654779-post90.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1657005-post207.html

insults come in handy then

Insults are her stock and trade. Everybody has to have something, I suppose.

And, your 'quality' of input is usually focused on your object of obsession at the moment. You are quite unstable and quite disturbed. I'm surprised the institution where you surely must reside allows you internet access. Kathaksung does get his access, so it's highly possible your institution gives it to you, as well.

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

 

[manifold]

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

Hey go easy on quasimodo. she's shenshitive.

 

[L.K.Eder]

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

Hey go easy on quasimodo. she's shenshitive.

also wicked shmaat. and i am going easy.

 

[Fatality]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

 

[Article 15]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

Do you think the picture's caption was racist, racist?

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

[L.K.Eder]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

this is the case in bizarro universe

 

[guitfnky]

you have to ask yourself, how is it that a person could look at that picture/caption and NOT think it is racist. it's actually pretty simple. here's how:

1) look at the picture (this is the easiest part).
2) read the caption (this at least requires some degree of literacy).
3) see a big word, and ignore it (in this particular case, the caption then magically changes to "Is a crime against American values - Repeal Loving v. Virginia").
3½) see a reference to a Supreme Court case you know nothing about. Ignore this as well.
4) after revising the caption in your mind in step 3-3½ (thus warping reality to your fiercely determined will), you truthfully state that there is nothing racist about this picture/caption.

to be fair, that's not the way most reasonable people would tackle this question, so I'll demonstrate how that works here as well:

1) look at the picture (this is the easiest part).
2) read the caption (this at least requires some degree of literacy).
3) see a big word, and realize that you don't understand what it means (miscegenation is the mixing of racial groups - NOTE: this general definition took less than 10 seconds to find using a quick Google search).
3½) incorporate the meaning of the previously mentioned "big word" into the rest of the caption to gain an understanding of what is being said (in this particular case, the caption then magically changes to "The mixing of racial groups is a crime against American values - Repeal Loving v. Virginia").
3¾) *OPTIONAL STEP* at this point, you already have enough information to make a valid determination as to the racial intent of the picture, so you can move on to step 4 if you like. if you prefer to be really thorough though, you could look up the Loving v. Virginia case as well (where you would find that this is the case that ended all race-based marriage restrictions in this country)
4) after revising the caption in your mind in step 3-3¾ (thus coming to an understanding of the reality of the matter), you truthfully come to the conclusion that this picture, and it's corresponding caption are, in fact, reallyfuckingracist.

 

[bodecea]

I agree with you that there have been way to many calls of faux-racism from the left. But, the faux-racism calls do effectively marginalize the impact of the fight against true racism. This is such a case.

They reap the consequences of not being believed on one of the few times when they actually have it right.

So....you are saying that because some people are overly sensitive and call racism where there is none, pictures like in the OP will not be seen for the racism that they are. In other words, it's the Left's fault.

I guess it's not so much your laziness about reading. My mistake. It's your lack of actually comprehending what you read. How sad for you.

I was spot on, wasn't I? I can tell by your reaction.

 

[Fatality]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

this is the case in bizarro universe

you should really join the rest of us here in the real world instead of hating black men who eat chicken.

 

[Fatality]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

Do you think the picture's caption was racist, racist?

Simple yes or no will suffice.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1658814-post308.html

 

[Article 15]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

this is the case in bizarro universe

you should really join the rest of us here in the real world instead of hating black men who eat chicken.

It's the caption that makes it blatantly racist, racist.

 

[bodecea]

Pretty damn hilarious. Dog face castigates Bod for not reading - then can't even follow the freakin thread. Betrayus had nothing to do with the Move-on user generated ad mentioned a number of times here:


http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654587-post42.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654779-post90.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1657005-post207.html





Insults are her stock and trade. Everybody has to have something, I suppose.

And, your 'quality' of input is usually focused on your object of obsession at the moment. You are quite unstable and quite disturbed. I'm surprised the institution where you surely must reside allows you internet access. Kathaksung does get his access, so it's highly possible your institution gives it to you, as well.

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

And, for god's sake, don't anybody bring up the term "scalp"!!!!!!!!!!!!!



(sorry, inside joke)

 

[Article 15]

everytime liberals see a black guy eating chicken their racist tendencies come out, then they try to assuage their guilt by shifting the blame onto others.

Do you think the picture's caption was racist, racist?

Simple yes or no will suffice.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1658814-post308.html

Once again notice that the racist refuses to acknowledge the blatant racism in the caption that accompanies the pic which by itself would have been benign.

 

[bodecea]

Pretty damn hilarious. Dog face castigates Bod for not reading - then can't even follow the freakin thread. Betrayus had nothing to do with the Move-on user generated ad mentioned a number of times here:


http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654587-post42.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1654779-post90.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1657005-post207.html





Insults are her stock and trade. Everybody has to have something, I suppose.

And, your 'quality' of input is usually focused on your object of obsession at the moment. You are quite unstable and quite disturbed. I'm surprised the institution where you surely must reside allows you internet access. Kathaksung does get his access, so it's highly possible your institution gives it to you, as well.

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

What a HOOT! Si Modo just neg repped me again....this time for "not reading the thread"!

 

[Si modo]

So....you are saying that because some people are overly sensitive and call racism where there is none, pictures like in the OP will not be seen for the racism that they are. In other words, it's the Left's fault.

I guess it's not so much your laziness about reading. My mistake. It's your lack of actually comprehending what you read. How sad for you.

I was spot on, wasn't I? I can tell by your reaction.

You'd guess not, but don't let that stop you from making more of a fool of yourself. It's sad that you are not even aware of your comprehension issues. I am sure they have remedial reading course somewhere. I know community colleges have them, but I suspect that that remedial curriculum would be too advanced for you. You may be able to work up to a community college, though. It's a goal.

 

[L.K.Eder]

And, your 'quality' of input is usually focused on your object of obsession at the moment. You are quite unstable and quite disturbed. I'm surprised the institution where you surely must reside allows you internet access. Kathaksung does get his access, so it's highly possible your institution gives it to you, as well.

the good thing with you is that seem to forget rather fast.

soon you will run around again and chastise other posters for imagined non sequiturs, call people racist for saying token and complain about inaccurate or irrelevant posts, that you don't get.

What a HOOT! Si Modo just neg repped me again....this time for "not reading the thread"!

then she will soon accuse you of whining, which is very funny as i consider those kind of neg reps whining.