NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 25,103
- 4,990
09630 cgrbr.23.09.08 #9,630 “Democrats will protect unborn bald eagles but write laws destroying unborn human children?”
09639 nf.23.07.08 #9,639 to #9,630 “What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children?”
09640 cgrbr.23.07.09 #9,640 to #9,639 “ Laws in states that are attempting to overturn the SCOTUS decision on abortion.
You wrote in post #9,630 that Democrats write laws destroying unborn human children?” I questioned your expressed observation by asking you in post #9,630 What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children? Your response came in post #9,640 which was “Laws in states that are attempting to overturn the SCOTUS decision on abortion.”
I have not heard of any laws that are attempting to overturn Dobbs. Let me remind you what Justice Sam Alito said when Dobbs was handed down;
States under Democrat Control and Red States like KANSAS do not need to pass laws like the one you made up In post #9,640
So I will ask you again: “What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children?”
No such law exists. You just made that up.
To support your recovery from your obsession you need to quit making things up about Democrats.
RvW itself was not a law passed by Democrats to destroy unborn human children. If it was then Dobbs is also a law that destroys unborn human children.
You might do well to learn the truth about the religious Protestant Christian right’s first six years of support for RvW having nothing to do with Democrats passing laws to destroy unborn human babies:
Live, learn and grow intellectually instead of wasting time preparing for the Rapture:
Just read this through. It will take only a few minutes.
When CarsomyrPlusSix goes all emoticon in with the “Fake News” button you will know all this is true. He can’t fathom a sentence that can refute any of it.
nf.23.07.09 #9,641 to #9,640
09639 nf.23.07.08 #9,639 to #9,630 “What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children?”
09640 cgrbr.23.07.09 #9,640 to #9,639 “ Laws in states that are attempting to overturn the SCOTUS decision on abortion.
You wrote in post #9,630 that Democrats write laws destroying unborn human children?” I questioned your expressed observation by asking you in post #9,630 What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children? Your response came in post #9,640 which was “Laws in states that are attempting to overturn the SCOTUS decision on abortion.”
I have not heard of any laws that are attempting to overturn Dobbs. Let me remind you what Justice Sam Alito said when Dobbs was handed down;
“For our part, we do not question the motives of either those who have supported and those who have opposed laws restricting abortion”
States under Democrat Control and Red States like KANSAS do not need to pass laws like the one you made up In post #9,640
So I will ask you again: “What law ever written or passed by Democrats applies a specific penalty upon conviction for violation of a law that requires the destruction of unborn human children?”
No such law exists. You just made that up.
To support your recovery from your obsession you need to quit making things up about Democrats.
RvW itself was not a law passed by Democrats to destroy unborn human children. If it was then Dobbs is also a law that destroys unborn human children.
You might do well to learn the truth about the religious Protestant Christian right’s first six years of support for RvW having nothing to do with Democrats passing laws to destroy unborn human babies:
Live, learn and grow intellectually instead of wasting time preparing for the Rapture:
Just read this through. It will take only a few minutes.
The Southern Baptist Convention’s president at the time of the Roe ruling, Dallas First Baptist Church preacher W. A. Criswell, celebrated the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling by taking the time to write that he was pleased. •••• “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person, and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.” (author bold) ••••• That assessment informs that even evangelical leaders were still reading their “Holy Bible” and attempting to follow the teachings of their “unerring god” prior to becoming agents of the Catholic Church in America. •••• To be fair, at the time of the Roe decision there were a few, very few, evangelical extremists who only mildly criticized the ruling. For the most part “the overwhelming response was silence, even approval.” In particular, evangelical fundamentalists “applauded the decision as an appropriate articulation of the division between church and state, and between personal morality and state regulation of individual behavior.” (author bold) ••••• W. Barry Garrett wrote in the Baptist Press that, “Religious liberty, human equality and justice are advanced by the Supreme Court abortion decision.” •••• It is particularly noteworthy that nearly all evangelical fundamentalists regarded any and all opposition to Roe v. Wade a perverse Catholic issue; most were wholly indifferent to what choice a woman made concerning her own body. •••• During a symposium sponsored by the Christian Medical Society and the so-called “flagship magazine” of the entire evangelical movement, Christianity Today “refused to characterize abortion as sinful, citing individual health, family welfare, and social responsibility as adequate justifications for ending a pregnancy.” (author bold) •••• It took a full six years (1979) for the religious right leadership to abandon its pro-choice position and summarily obey the Vatican, the Heritage Foundation and its so-called “Moral Majority” founder Paul Weyrich. The religious right extremist Weyrich convinced evangelical clergy to “seize on abortion as a Republican cause célèbre and rallying cry to deny President Jimmy Carter a second term.” ••••
When the religious right was pro-choice evangelicals applauded Roe v Wade rvwBaptist & moralmajority
•••• The Christian opposition to President Carter was due to his threat to strip evangelicals’ tax exempt status if they continued actively supporting school segregation across the South. Sustaining and protecting segregated schools was a racial dog whistle and dependable electoral stratagem to elect Republicans in the former Confederacy.
When CarsomyrPlusSix goes all emoticon in with the “Fake News” button you will know all this is true. He can’t fathom a sentence that can refute any of it.
nf.23.07.09 #9,641 to #9,640
Last edited:
