Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

Where’s those piles of dead women I was promised?
Where is the total ban against abortion nationwide that your billions upon billions of propaganda dollars and political contributions to anti-woman Republican politicians that was spent the past five decades failed to achieve for Baby Fetus.

Had you religious conservatives collectively directed that same energy and money toward eliminating poverty and policies to low income women to doctor, feed, clothe and house every newborn child in America over (1) cutting taxes for the rich and (2) proving to be a lucrative market for assault rifle sales and manufacturers And (3) invading Iraq you may have saved more baby fetuses using the power of love of life instead of the fixation on political hate - sexist and racist and sexual orientation hate.

wthrmn.23.07.21
 
Last edited:
" Semantic Trolls Quibbling With Reality Against The Business Of Any Which Can "

* Life Continues Though It Began Long Before Hue Hew Arrived *

Good. I’m glad you agree. So, life begins at conception.
Life began before conception , life did not begin at conception , and the sophisticated physical state of an individual is capable of and responsible for the perpetuity of its own individual self , one haploid at a time .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement , individuals are subject to relativism for event outcomes within nature .

To improve quality of life and opportunity to perpetuate life , one exchanges natural freedoms for membership in a social civil contract , according to a constitution .

The standards of a social civil agreement based on principles of non violence and individualism , on e pluribus unum for us republic , follow equitable doctrine with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals .

The standards of a social civil agreement are not based on principles of non aggression , which ascetics are welcome to apply to themselves .

None disregards loss of an other by death to be a triviality , though the abortion anti-choice pundit denies that recompense is based on empathy , whether for a victim with a capacity and a compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself , or whether for others with a capacity and a compulsion to grieve for the loss of a victim .

By definition , the physical capacity and compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself is not present in an inchoate zygote , or embryo , or fetus , thus there is not an ethical or valid basis for representing a conjectural victim by proxy .

The only remaining argument to represent a victim by legal proxy is whether others with a capacity and compulsion to grieve are entitled to recompense by empathy for the loss of a conjectural victim .

In reply to texas private prosecution laws , scotus indicated that plaintiffs cannot file a civil suit based simply on knowledge that an abortion had occurred and that actual damages must have been incurred .

The onset of sentience is a necessary requirement for empathy with the suffering of a fetus , and empathy with the mother depends on her own empathy for the zygote , or embryo , or fetus and not some conjectural empathy by a collective hell bent on dictating emotions to the mother .

* Bold Blubbering About Innocence From Conceited Authoritarian Freak Clowns Seeking Self Validation *
Then? Terminating that life is the taking of life. A unique and helpless and innocent life.
W W W W W A A A A A H H H H H ! ! ! ! !

The onset of sentience is an ethical and a valid requirement for empathy with the suffering of a fetus .
 
Based upon facts and conclusions in post #9,873 of course terminating a gestating
life is the taking of a gestating life. A unique and helpless and innocent gestating life that dies in a miscarriage and is aborted about one in five conceptions. Nature’s God kills a lot of unique and helpless and innocent
gestating human lives.

Do you have a point in post #9,872 ? Abortion kills a unique and helpless and innocent gestating human life whether it is natural or self-induced? Why is self induced abirtio any of your business?

bckvgn.23.07.20 #9,872
nf.23.07.20 #9,874
You are not permitted to alter quotes. You altered my quote. Don’t do that shit.
 
" Semantic Trolls Quibbling With Reality Against The Business Of Any Which Can "

* Life Continues Though It Began Long Before Hue Hew Arrived *


Life began before conception , life did not begin at conception , and the sophisticated physical state of an individual is capable of and responsible for the perpetuity of its own individual self , one haploid at a time .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement , individuals are subject to relativism for event outcomes within nature .

To improve quality of life and opportunity to perpetuate life , one exchanges natural freedoms for membership in a social civil contract , according to a constitution .

The standards of a social civil agreement based on principles of non violence and individualism , on e pluribus unum for us republic , follow equitable doctrine with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals .

The standards of a social civil agreement are not based on principles of non aggression , which ascetics are welcome to apply to themselves .

None disregards loss of an other by death to be a triviality , though the abortion anti-choice pundit denies that recompense is based on empathy , whether for a victim with a capacity and a compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself , or whether for others with a capacity and a compulsion to grieve for the loss of a victim .

By definition , the physical capacity and compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself is not present in an inchoate zygote , or embryo , or fetus , thus there is not an ethical or valid basis for representing a conjectural victim by proxy .

The only remaining argument to represent a victim by legal proxy is whether others with a capacity and compulsion to grieve are entitled to recompense by empathy for the loss of a conjectural victim .

In reply to texas private prosecution laws , scotus indicated that plaintiffs cannot file a civil suit based simply on knowledge that an abortion had occurred and that actual damages must have been incurred .

The onset of sentience is a necessary requirement for empathy with the suffering of a fetus , and empathy with the mother depends on her own empathy for the zygote , or embryo , or fetus and not some conjectural empathy by a collective hell bent on dictating emotions to the mother .

* Bold Blubbering About Innocence From Conceited Authoritarian Freak Clowns Seeking Self Validation *

W W W W W A A A A A H H H H H ! ! ! ! !

The onset of sentience is an ethical and a valid requirement for empathy with the suffering of a fetus .
You’re still a retard.

All manner of life existed before any one individual human was conceived.

But your individual life did not (and could not) exist before you were conceived.

You are an illiterate. But you are also quite fully retarded.
 
You are not permitted to alter quotes. You altered my quote. Don’t do that shit.
Is life during pregnancy “gestating life” or life in the gestation stage of life. When life is born it is no longer gestating. Can you acknowledge that gestation is real and is not similarly situated to independent life following birth.

Duly noted you cannot carry on a conversation if the reality that gestation is a biological fact during the first nine months of a human being on the lifetime continuum that begins at conception is mentioned. It destroys your entire argument.
 
" Life Is Perpetuated Through Individual Haploids "

* Sperm And Ova Are Game Meets *

You’re still a retard.
All manner of life existed before any one individual human was conceived.
But your individual life did not (and could not) exist before you were conceived.
You are an illiterate. But you are also quite fully retarded.
Of course the life of an individual existed before having been conceived , as the meaning of an afterlife is to pass on ones genetic identity through gametes , one haploid at a time , so that another , both figuratively and literally as ones self , by means of a sophisticated physical state , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection that is afforded , described or otherwise understood as life .

Ultimately , empathy for suffering of an inchoate zygote , or embryo , or fetus is not valid , whereas empathy for suffering by the mother is situational .
 
Science says life begins at conception.
By definition , the physical capacity and compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself is not present in an inchoate zygote , or embryo , or fetus , thus there is not an ethical or valid basis for representing a conjectural victim by proxy

Science also says with deeper understanding that we must employ; that gestating life begins at conception with no guarantee of making it naturally to the first breath of independent life.

According to Mr. Monk-Eye, the physical capacity and compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself is not present during gestating life.

So while you were in the gestating stage of life St BackAgain; would it matter to you as you lacked the physical capacity to grieve for the loss of yourself whether you were aborted by selection of Nature or by selection of the independently mature human being, one of two, who made your conception possible in the first place?

bckvgn.23.03.09 #7,499
mvnkvyv.23.07.21 #9,886
nf.23.07.21 #9,887
 
Last edited:
According to nature we know for a fact that one out of five conceptions do not become a potential life.
False. At conception, it is a life. It may not survive all the way to birth.
A conception does not create independent life? A conception creates a gestating life. If one out of five gestating lives do not live past twenty-two weeks naturally, they do not ever become or have the potential to become an independent life that has survived the transformation from potential independent life in the gestational stage of life to actual independent life by surviving a birth on a specific date at a specific hour and at a specific minute that is placed on record with the state including hand and foot printing, passing out cigars and blowing up balloons that say “it” s a girl or “it”s a boy. The informal transformation from an it to a person is when independent life begins. For propaganda purposes BackAgain cancels all that and bans any word usage beyond “life” and only life when a woman becomes pregnant.

nf.23.07.20 #9,869
bckvgn.23.07.20 #9,870
nf.23.07.22 #9,888
 
And many say religion is not involved in the forced full term gestation movement:

Preferred Women’s Health took center stage this week as Operation Save America conferred in Atlanta with its supporters to deter people from seeking abortion while strategizing its push for banning abortion at any stage of pregnancy in every state, including criminal charges for the pregnant person. On Thursday evening, the religious organization held sessions at Pray’s Mill Baptist Church in nearby Douglasville, where topics included spiritual warfare on abortion, the LGBTQ community and turning away from conservatism.​
Amid stories of the 1988 protests, Benham and Rusty Thomas, who are former directors of Operation Save America, talked Thursday night about turning away from today’s conservative party and relying on the church. Other speakers echoed the same sentiment, stating that the church could and should be the entity to bring about the end of abortion.​
Benham spoke of abortion as the taking of an innocent life that has a voice calling out for vengeance. Until that issue is taken care of — meaning a full national ban with no exceptions for any reason — nothing else matters, he said.​
 
Believing that the sanctity of life begins at first breath is not dumbassery. It is aligned with the US Constitution when government protection of life begins at birth. If anyone steps foot on US soil they are under US Constitution jurisdiction.
The only way for this post to be true, is if government ignores a life as it is being formed within the womb, otherwise to somehow suggest or think that during such a period that it is not a life or it is not alive, so therefore it can be discarded as such ?

This was not the intent of the founder's, otherwise it is not found in any documents they had written because the nation hadn't contemplated such a thing nor was it engaged in such uncivilized order in regards to such an issue.
 
" Life Is Perpetuated Through Individual Haploids "

* Sperm And Ova Are Game Meets *


Of course the life of an individual existed before having been conceived , as the meaning of an afterlife is to pass on ones genetic identity through gametes , one haploid at a time , so that another , both figuratively and literally as ones self , by means of a sophisticated physical state , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection that is afforded , described or otherwise understood as life .

Ultimately , empathy for suffering of an inchoate zygote , or embryo , or fetus is not valid , whereas empathy for suffering by the mother is situational .
Monk-flea is still just a blithering asshole.

Life still begins at conception.
 
Is life during pregnancy “gestating life” or life in the gestation stage of life. When life is born it is no longer gestating. Can you acknowledge that gestation is real and is not similarly situated to independent life following birth.

Duly noted you cannot carry on a conversation if the reality that gestation is a biological fact during the first nine months of a human being on the lifetime continuum that begins at conception is mentioned. It destroys your entire argument.
Don’t alter quotes, you retard.
 
Science also says with deeper understanding that we must employ; that gestating life begins at conception with no guarantee of making it naturally to the first breath of independent life.

According to Mr. Monk-Eye, the physical capacity and compulsion to grieve for the loss of itself is not present during gestating life.

So while you were in the gestating stage of life St BackAgain; would it matter to you as you lacked the physical capacity to grieve for the loss of yourself whether you were aborted by selection of Nature or by selection of the independently mature human being, one of two, who made your conception possible in the first place?

bckvgn.23.03.09 #7,499
mvnkvyv.23.07.21 #9,886
nf.23.07.21 #9,887
But life still begins at conception. End of story.
 
I didn’t ask you what your ignorant view or opinion is, you moron.

And yet again you had to drag religion into it. You dolt.
Can ya tell that these demon's on here might hate Godly religious beliefs or Godliness in general??? Of course we can.
 
If a "fetus" is part of the mother while inside the womb, why does someone get charged with 2 counts of murder if they kill a pregnant woman?
If a human zygote is a living human, with its own unique DNA, then it is deserving of the right to life. Yes or no?
A conception creates a life. No modifier needed.
Care to answer the question posed in post 3802?someone get charged with 2 counts of murder if they kill a pregnant woman?

Any person must be charged with 2 counts of murder if they kill a pregnant woman and her fetus because such a person has no right to end gestation in a woman’s body. Only the woman herself has the right to end gestation in her own body because she is the only person who can assume the risk of gestating her fetus to full term. A person who is not the mother of a fetus has no way of being harmed by gestating another person’s fetus and thus has no legitimate role in making a decision to end gestation.

rplnmchnc.22.07.22 #3,802
bckvgn.22.07.22 #3,805
bckvgn.23.07. 22 #9,894
rplnmchnc.22.07.23 #3,806
nf.23.07.22 #9,896
 
Last edited:
Any person must be charged with 2 counts of murder if they kill a pregnant woman and her fetus because such a person has no right to end gestation in a woman’s body. Only the woman herself has the right to end gestation in her own body because she is the only person who can assume the risk of gestating her fetus to full term. A person who is not the mother of a fetus has no way of being harmed by gestating a fetus.

rplnmchnc.22.07.22 #3,802
bckvgn.22.07.22 #3,805
bckvgn.23.07. 22 #9,894
rplnmchnc.22.07.23 #3,806
nf.23.07.22 #9,896
Same old nothing of a response.
Get some real material.
 
If a human zygote is a living human, with its own unique DNA, then it is deserving of the right to life. Yes or no?
No. And answer me this; Deserving from whom? Who is it you claim must give an unwanted fetus in the womb of a woman the right to full term gestation?



bckvgn.22.07.22 #3,805
nf.23.07.22 #9,898
 
Last edited:
Is partaking in sexual intercourse for pleasure a crime? When an unwanted pregnancy occurs under that situation are both participants to be indicted and punishment set for both.

Or is just the woman declared guilty and punished by forced gestation without a trial ?

chmngnr.23.07.19Today at 8:38 PM#9,856
nf.24.07.19
It becomes a crime or sin in the aftermath, otherwise depending on the action's of the individuals who try to deal with their reckless action's in a very evil and selfish way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top