The T
George S. Patton Party
I bailed on this thread 100 posts ago - it has a life of its own.
We just like highlighting the desperation of you demagogues.
Seconded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bailed on this thread 100 posts ago - it has a life of its own.
We just like highlighting the desperation of you demagogues.
As are those about Romney. The key difference here is the R vs the D.That is such crap!!! Republicans have been trying for four years to get some scandal going on the prez. But nothing has stuck because most of the stories are ridiculous. What's pissing you off is that nobody can find a juicy scandal in Obama's past. That just kills you and your pals.
You all had better focus your energy elsewhere. Find out more about the loser you're planning to vote for in November.
I don't think this story about him masquerading as a cop is false. Are you actually saying you think so???
No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
Well, here you are, defending Bishop Romney without knowing if the story is true or not.I don't think this story about him masquerading as a cop is false. Are you actually saying you think so???
He does no critical thinking. Just regurgitated talking points.
that is quite possibly the funniest thing you have ever posted
Well, here you are, defending Bishop Romney without knowing if the story is true or not.He does no critical thinking. Just regurgitated talking points.
that is quite possibly the funniest thing you have ever posted
And when it turns out to be true, you'll still be defending him.
Hack.
Fuck off, please. Hack.No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
list all ten and your sources, please.
It doesn't matter - you will still defend him. No matter what. Hack.Well, here you are, defending Bishop Romney without knowing if the story is true or not.that is quite possibly the funniest thing you have ever posted
And when it turns out to be true, you'll still be defending him.
Hack.
So, I should be more like the lefties, and believe him guilty without enough actual evidence to prove it?
Fuck off, please. Hack.No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
list all ten and your sources, please.
No. Just not gonna jump through any hoops for some wingnut hack.Fuck off, please. Hack.list all ten and your sources, please.
Translation:
You were talking out of your ass again, cannot offer proof of the statement, and therefore that makes 'me', somehow, the hack.
You're pathetic.
It doesn't matter - you will still defend him. No matter what. Hack.Well, here you are, defending Bishop Romney without knowing if the story is true or not.
And when it turns out to be true, you'll still be defending him.
Hack.
So, I should be more like the lefties, and believe him guilty without enough actual evidence to prove it?
So the DNC just deals from the bottom of the deck of a stack of talking-point cards with much interpretive ado about nothing? Eh, you guys watch too much Seinfeld.No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
No. Just not gonna jump through any hoops for some wingnut hack.Fuck off, please. Hack.
Translation:
You were talking out of your ass again, cannot offer proof of the statement, and therefore that makes 'me', somehow, the hack.
You're pathetic.
No. Just not gonna jump through any hoops for some wingnut hack.Fuck off, please. Hack.
Translation:
You were talking out of your ass again, cannot offer proof of the statement, and therefore that makes 'me', somehow, the hack.
You're pathetic.
I see this horse is still being beaten...
No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
No it wouldn't. There were plenty of stories about each of the GOP primary contenders that were ignored by the so-called 'Liberal' MSM.I would like to point out that if this story had any credibility it would have been picked up by the major news networks by now...
Hell, there were about 10 embarrassing stories about Santorun alone that weren't reported.
IF the media was so liberal biased as people say, why not make the GOP look as foolish as then can?
And I agree with Conservative, where is the proof? Don't make claims you can't back up.