PC depends on and expects readers to NOT check her sources. If the reader clicks on The Washington Monthly link they will discover an article that actually disputes her entire post. She blindly used it because it contained a quote that fit her agenda, but the quote was used to show an example of a false reporting and allegation. Directly following the quote:His definitions of a communist were as flexible and meaningless as yours. So what is a communist or a communist supporter? Who is given the authority to label someone a communist or fascist and what evidence is required? We probably all have made statements at one time that some nut could claim were fascist or communistic.The Paul Revere of his era, ruined at least one career, and that was his own.
So....why do you Liberal liars constantly claim he 'ruined' innocent folks' lives when he revealed that they were communists and communist supporters?
Must be fear of the truth, huh?
Perhaps one that is publicly anticommunist and makes speeches about the communists in all about us is the real communist and the anticommunist speeches are the real cover? What evidence did McCarthy have that there were 205, or whatever number he was using at the time, have for those communists in the State Department?
"His definitions of a communist were as flexible and meaningless as yours."
Really?
First of all,I wanted an admission that he never "ruined the lives of innocent Americans via baseless accusations."
And you provided that proof.
2. Communists were those who wanted to replace the American government and Constitution with Stalin's dictatorship.
Communists answered to and/or agreed with Stalin.
a. "When anti-communism took its toll in Hollywood, the blacklisting took the “deadly” form of not having ones name in the credits, or living in Paris, or not being able to sell a teleplay for as much as three years. This for folks who had no problem with Ukrainian farmers and their children eating their shoes."
b. Roosevelt's New Deal was riddled with communists....paid agents of Stalin. At a dinner party, a number administration officials spilled the beans, spoke openly about the plans to cause a revolution so they can rebuild America in the Soviet's image. "Wirt claimed he had "discovered" evidence of a plot within FDR's administration to launch a Bolshevik takeover of the United States..... garnering all kind of media attention, and even testifying before Congress about his evidence of a "concrete plan" for the overthrow of the U.S. government crafted by members of FDR's "Brain Trusters." "Roosevelt is only the Kerensky of this revolution," he quoted them. (Kerensky was the provisional leader of Russia just before the 1917 Bolshevik revolution.) The hoodwinked president would be permitted to stay in office, they said, "until we are ready to supplant him with a Stalin." The Washington Monthly
Six years after the Democrats on the select committee branded Wirt a liar, one of the members, Democrat John J. O'Connor (Democrat, NY) "confessed in a statement today that he had helped prevent a thorough investigation in 1934 of charges by the late Dr. William A. Wirt that a group of New Dealers were plotting a new American revolution....expressed belief that most of the latter's charges had come true.....there was a deliberately conceived plot among New Dealers to overthrow the established social order in this country and substitute a planned economy.":
"O'Connor Admits Helping to Discredit Dr. Wirt," The Utica Observer-Dispatch, April 10, 1940.
"Wirt's provocative tale soon feel apart; his "evidence" crumbled, and Republican leaders decided they didn't want anything to do with the guy. He quickly vanished from the public spotlight."
This is why cherry picking is mocked. The cherry picked quote comes from an article that refutes her conspiracy theory. Click on the link to see for yourself. It is a short article.
Last edited: