Rudy to Begin Revealing Top Level Democrats Making Millions of Dollars Selling Their Public Office

[Faun]

Actually there are laws against smear campaigns- haven't you heard of libel laws?

So you agree that these are just unsubstantiated smears with no evidence to support them.

Yes, there are laws like that, they are settled in lawsuits. To be honest, I don't care about smears or name calling. It doesn't have any interest for me in politics. How many times has Biden and the other commies called Trump a racist? You can dish it out but can't take it.

The main point however is that Trump is perfectly within his power to get rid of an ambassador who is causing problems. That's the only thing of concern here.

Trump absolutely has the right to remove any ambassador.
What we have seen here is that removal was part of the bigger scheme to secretly demand that Ukraine interfere with the 2020 election.

And that is the only thing of concern here.

Back to the OP- has Rudy taken time off from smearing Trump's enemies to release this dirt he promised to release on Friday?

Oh, so now it's interfering in the election? Do you people make this stuff up as you go along?

Please explain how Trump was going to interfere in the election by looking for what the Biden's ACTUALLY DID???

Have you been living under a rock for the last 2 months?

Trump has never looked at what the Biden's actually did.
Trump did fire the ambassador that Giuliani and his two criminal associates had indicated were in the way of their anti-Biden campaign.
Trump did make a secret phone call to the President of Ukraine asking him to investigate his political rival- and his son.
Trump did have his personal attorney secretly demand that the President of the Ukraine personally announce an investigation into his political rival.
Trump has never made an official, written request to Ukraine to investigate the Bidens- no official paper trail.

Have I been living under a rock? You talk about all these secretive things going on, yet somehow, you know about them. Do you have friends in Ukraine or something???

Yes, Trump was looking into what the Biden's were up to. Nothing wrong or illegal about it. He (as CEO) has that authority.

We know about them thanks to the courage of a whistleblower.

 

[Faun]

Oh, so now it's interfering in the election? Do you people make this stuff up as you go along?

Please explain how Trump was going to interfere in the election by looking for what the Biden's ACTUALLY DID???

by having his personal attorney dole out any "information" over time to the press instead of giving it to the DOJ for them to act upon.
















Oh wait....Rudy was lying about that! I forgot!

I don't know what that iron wall is in your heads on the left, but Biden was not his political rival; he still isn't. Nobody will know who Trump's contender will be until summer--THIS SUMMER!

LOLOL

They're both running for the same office. Of course they're political rivals.

Even Impeached Trump knows Biden is a political rival even if you are too stupid to admit it; as evidenced by Impeached Trump spending millions in ads against Biden and by soliciting a foreign national to look for dirt on Biden.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, there are laws like that, they are settled in lawsuits. To be honest, I don't care about smears or name calling. It doesn't have any interest for me in politics. How many times has Biden and the other commies called Trump a racist? You can dish it out but can't take it.

The main point however is that Trump is perfectly within his power to get rid of an ambassador who is causing problems. That's the only thing of concern here.

Trump absolutely has the right to remove any ambassador.
What we have seen here is that removal was part of the bigger scheme to secretly demand that Ukraine interfere with the 2020 election.

And that is the only thing of concern here.

Back to the OP- has Rudy taken time off from smearing Trump's enemies to release this dirt he promised to release on Friday?

Oh, so now it's interfering in the election? Do you people make this stuff up as you go along?

Please explain how Trump was going to interfere in the election by looking for what the Biden's ACTUALLY DID???

Have you been living under a rock for the last 2 months?

Trump has never looked at what the Biden's actually did.
Trump did fire the ambassador that Giuliani and his two criminal associates had indicated were in the way of their anti-Biden campaign.
Trump did make a secret phone call to the President of Ukraine asking him to investigate his political rival- and his son.
Trump did have his personal attorney secretly demand that the President of the Ukraine personally announce an investigation into his political rival.
Trump has never made an official, written request to Ukraine to investigate the Bidens- no official paper trail.

Have I been living under a rock? You talk about all these secretive things going on, yet somehow, you know about them. Do you have friends in Ukraine or something???

Yes, Trump was looking into what the Biden's were up to. Nothing wrong or illegal about it. He (as CEO) has that authority.

We know about them thanks to the courage of a whistleblower.

Without the whistleblower, Trump would have gotten away with it

 

[Redfish]

One would hope you would know why you're posting on a thread towards which you can't contribute, ya dumb bitch.

To fill you in... Impeached Trump's personal attorney said once again he had a plethora of documentation that would sink Biden; but once again, he failed to produce shit.

Rudy promised his info 6 days ago. Parnas's lawyer released the recording of Trump's dinner -discussing Yovanovitch - 4 days ago. Rudy is probably a little nervous right now.

Yup. Who knows what Parnas has on Rudy.

Three things to keep in mind....

1) Parnas and Fruman were caught while trying to flee the U.S. with one-way tickets; meaning someone had to tip them off the feds were looking to arrest them.

2) Parnas is singing like a bird.

3) Like Impeached Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Giuliani is under investigation.

In a world other than Trumplandia, Pompeo would have resigned by now, over his corrupt failure to protect Marie Yovanovitch from a smear campaign Pompeo knew to be based on falsehoods. Rudy, having bragged about getting Yovanovitch fired, should have lawsuits in his future.

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

If I paid Trump a million dollars to fire an Ambassador, is that okay?

Of course not.

If the son of the vice president was getting 83K per month from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company and the VP refused to release foreign aid unless the prosecutor investigating corruption at that gas company was fired, is that OK?

 

[Redfish]

Trump absolutely has the right to remove any ambassador.
What we have seen here is that removal was part of the bigger scheme to secretly demand that Ukraine interfere with the 2020 election.

And that is the only thing of concern here.

Back to the OP- has Rudy taken time off from smearing Trump's enemies to release this dirt he promised to release on Friday?

Oh, so now it's interfering in the election? Do you people make this stuff up as you go along?

Please explain how Trump was going to interfere in the election by looking for what the Biden's ACTUALLY DID???

Have you been living under a rock for the last 2 months?

Trump has never looked at what the Biden's actually did.
Trump did fire the ambassador that Giuliani and his two criminal associates had indicated were in the way of their anti-Biden campaign.
Trump did make a secret phone call to the President of Ukraine asking him to investigate his political rival- and his son.
Trump did have his personal attorney secretly demand that the President of the Ukraine personally announce an investigation into his political rival.
Trump has never made an official, written request to Ukraine to investigate the Bidens- no official paper trail.

Have I been living under a rock? You talk about all these secretive things going on, yet somehow, you know about them. Do you have friends in Ukraine or something???

Yes, Trump was looking into what the Biden's were up to. Nothing wrong or illegal about it. He (as CEO) has that authority.

We know about them thanks to the courage of a whistleblower.

Without the whistleblower, Trump would have gotten away with it

gotten away with what? He got nothing from the Ukrainian president, the aid was sent, there was no quid pro quo, nothing wrong with any of it.

Now, what do you think about Biden getting away with bribing the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was looking into the corruption involving his son and Burisma? and Biden admitted it all and bragged about what he had done. "I told him you have six hours to fire the prosecutor or you won't get the money, and son of a bitch he was fired"

 

[Redfish]

One would hope you would know why you're posting on a thread towards which you can't contribute, ya dumb bitch.

To fill you in... Impeached Trump's personal attorney said once again he had a plethora of documentation that would sink Biden; but once again, he failed to produce shit.

Rudy promised his info 6 days ago. Parnas's lawyer released the recording of Trump's dinner -discussing Yovanovitch - 4 days ago. Rudy is probably a little nervous right now.

Yup. Who knows what Parnas has on Rudy.

Three things to keep in mind....

1) Parnas and Fruman were caught while trying to flee the U.S. with one-way tickets; meaning someone had to tip them off the feds were looking to arrest them.

2) Parnas is singing like a bird.

3) Like Impeached Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Giuliani is under investigation.

In a world other than Trumplandia, Pompeo would have resigned by now, over his corrupt failure to protect Marie Yovanovitch from a smear campaign Pompeo knew to be based on falsehoods. Rudy, having bragged about getting Yovanovitch fired, should have lawsuits in his future.

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

Sure, they can be fired for any reason or no reason. In this case, there was a corrupt reason, and if one is instrumental in bringing about that firing with a corrupt reason - say Rudy Giuliani, for example - he probably committed the tort of interference with employment, at minimum.

what was the corrupt reason? the Schiff committee didn't find any crimes

 

[Redfish]

Here it is the end of the day on Wednesday, anyone seen this stuff from Rudy yet?

unlike the dems, Rudy will have everything together before he brings it. It will be a solid case, not a circus like the Schiff/Nadler fiasco

 

[Redfish]

I rated her as a stand-up woman. The douchebags who ran the smear campaign against her, and the douchebag who badmouthed her to President Zelensky, wouldn't know stand-up if it bit them in the ass.

There were two parts to the smear campaign against Yovanovitch.

The first part was the scheme by Parnas and Fruman to smear Yovanovitch and get her removed- this got some traction with right wing press- who can't pass up a smear story but was largely under the radar screen, even after Giuliani was brought it.

The second part was once Trump and his Trumpskies knew she was going to testify- then the full Trump smear machine went into effect- with Trump himself smearing her, and his loyal Trumpskies parroting his smears.

But there has been absolutely no evidence to support these smears- but Trump knows he doesn't need evidence to smear an American- his followers just don't care- if Trump says it- they are obligated to believe everything he says.

Since when have Dims ever been above smearing people? That's their SOP.

LOL- considering that we are talking about a Republican smear job, and considering that your Dear Leader spends most of his days smearing people on Twitter- great example of you following your Dear Leaders lead.

So you don't deny that Dims smear people all the time.

I don't deny that Trump and his loyal lackeys- like you- spend most of their days smearing anyone and everyone who Trump considers a threat.

Name one politician that doesn't do that. Just one. We could talk about the Clintons whose enemies mysteriously commit suicide by two shots to the back of the head.

 

[colfax_m]

Rudy promised his info 6 days ago. Parnas's lawyer released the recording of Trump's dinner -discussing Yovanovitch - 4 days ago. Rudy is probably a little nervous right now.

Yup. Who knows what Parnas has on Rudy.

Three things to keep in mind....

1) Parnas and Fruman were caught while trying to flee the U.S. with one-way tickets; meaning someone had to tip them off the feds were looking to arrest them.

2) Parnas is singing like a bird.

3) Like Impeached Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Giuliani is under investigation.

In a world other than Trumplandia, Pompeo would have resigned by now, over his corrupt failure to protect Marie Yovanovitch from a smear campaign Pompeo knew to be based on falsehoods. Rudy, having bragged about getting Yovanovitch fired, should have lawsuits in his future.

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

If I paid Trump a million dollars to fire an Ambassador, is that okay?

Of course not.

If the son of the vice president was getting 83K per month from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company and the VP refused to release foreign aid unless the prosecutor investigating corruption at that gas company was fired, is that OK?

So ambassadors can’t be fired for any reason? That’s what I thought.

Was Hunter Biden paid to get the prosecutor fired? There’s no evidence to support that allegation.

 

[Faun]

Trump absolutely has the right to remove any ambassador.
What we have seen here is that removal was part of the bigger scheme to secretly demand that Ukraine interfere with the 2020 election.

And that is the only thing of concern here.

Back to the OP- has Rudy taken time off from smearing Trump's enemies to release this dirt he promised to release on Friday?

Oh, so now it's interfering in the election? Do you people make this stuff up as you go along?

Please explain how Trump was going to interfere in the election by looking for what the Biden's ACTUALLY DID???

Have you been living under a rock for the last 2 months?

Trump has never looked at what the Biden's actually did.
Trump did fire the ambassador that Giuliani and his two criminal associates had indicated were in the way of their anti-Biden campaign.
Trump did make a secret phone call to the President of Ukraine asking him to investigate his political rival- and his son.
Trump did have his personal attorney secretly demand that the President of the Ukraine personally announce an investigation into his political rival.
Trump has never made an official, written request to Ukraine to investigate the Bidens- no official paper trail.

Have I been living under a rock? You talk about all these secretive things going on, yet somehow, you know about them. Do you have friends in Ukraine or something???

Yes, Trump was looking into what the Biden's were up to. Nothing wrong or illegal about it. He (as CEO) has that authority.

We know about them thanks to the courage of a whistleblower.

Without the whistleblower, Trump would have gotten away with it

That's why the right is so eager to lynch the whistleblower.

 

[Care4all]

Rudy Tutti should probably not throw stones in glass houses....

 

[Redfish]

Yup. Who knows what Parnas has on Rudy.

Three things to keep in mind....

1) Parnas and Fruman were caught while trying to flee the U.S. with one-way tickets; meaning someone had to tip them off the feds were looking to arrest them.

2) Parnas is singing like a bird.

3) Like Impeached Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Giuliani is under investigation.

In a world other than Trumplandia, Pompeo would have resigned by now, over his corrupt failure to protect Marie Yovanovitch from a smear campaign Pompeo knew to be based on falsehoods. Rudy, having bragged about getting Yovanovitch fired, should have lawsuits in his future.

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

If I paid Trump a million dollars to fire an Ambassador, is that okay?

Of course not.

If the son of the vice president was getting 83K per month from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company and the VP refused to release foreign aid unless the prosecutor investigating corruption at that gas company was fired, is that OK?

So ambassadors can’t be fired for any reason? That’s what I thought.

Was Hunter Biden paid to get the prosecutor fired? There’s no evidence to support that allegation.

you asked about a bribe, bribery is not legal, a president can fire anyone under him for any reason, but he cannot engage in a crime when doing it. Obama fired almost of all of Bush's appointees, did you bitch about that?

Hunter Biden was paid in order for that company to have access to the special treatment by the US government, WhyTF do you think they also hired the kids of Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney?

Joe Biden bribed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating corruption at the company that put those politician's kids on its payroll. He said "you have 6 hours to fire this guy or you won't get the money" How can you possibly think that is OK?

 

[Redfish]

Rudy Tutti should probably not throw stones in glass houses....

but its OK for Schiff to do that? I want to see Schiff under oath and asked about his dealings with the whistle blower.

 

[joaquinmiller]

There were two parts to the smear campaign against Yovanovitch.

The first part was the scheme by Parnas and Fruman to smear Yovanovitch and get her removed- this got some traction with right wing press- who can't pass up a smear story but was largely under the radar screen, even after Giuliani was brought it.

The second part was once Trump and his Trumpskies knew she was going to testify- then the full Trump smear machine went into effect- with Trump himself smearing her, and his loyal Trumpskies parroting his smears.

But there has been absolutely no evidence to support these smears- but Trump knows he doesn't need evidence to smear an American- his followers just don't care- if Trump says it- they are obligated to believe everything he says.

Since when have Dims ever been above smearing people? That's their SOP.

LOL- considering that we are talking about a Republican smear job, and considering that your Dear Leader spends most of his days smearing people on Twitter- great example of you following your Dear Leaders lead.

So you don't deny that Dims smear people all the time.

I don't deny that Trump and his loyal lackeys- like you- spend most of their days smearing anyone and everyone who Trump considers a threat.

Name one politician that doesn't do that. Just one. We could talk about the Clintons whose enemies mysteriously commit suicide by two shots to the back of the head.

That's a pretty good smear right there. Although at second glance, it's just a garden-variety, rightwingnut accusation of murder.

So, nothing new.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Friends in Ukraine? I thought you'd never ask.

 

[rightwinger]

Rudy Tutti should probably not throw stones in glass houses....

but its OK for Schiff to do that? I want to see Schiff under oath and asked about his dealings with the whistle blower.

Why?

The whistleblower did a service to our country

 

[Redfish]

Since when have Dims ever been above smearing people? That's their SOP.

LOL- considering that we are talking about a Republican smear job, and considering that your Dear Leader spends most of his days smearing people on Twitter- great example of you following your Dear Leaders lead.

So you don't deny that Dims smear people all the time.

I don't deny that Trump and his loyal lackeys- like you- spend most of their days smearing anyone and everyone who Trump considers a threat.

Name one politician that doesn't do that. Just one. We could talk about the Clintons whose enemies mysteriously commit suicide by two shots to the back of the head.

That's a pretty good smear right there. Although at second glance, it's just a garden-variety, rightwingnut accusation of murder.

So, nothing new.

the list of dead bodies who have bucked the clintons is quite extensive. Epstein at the top of the list. He was about to identify a long list of powerful people who participated in his juvenile rape organization, including bill clinton. So, the guards happened to be asleep, the cameras happened to fail, and his cellmate happened to be moved. Sure, and I have some ocean front property in Kansas to sell you.

 

[colfax_m]

In a world other than Trumplandia, Pompeo would have resigned by now, over his corrupt failure to protect Marie Yovanovitch from a smear campaign Pompeo knew to be based on falsehoods. Rudy, having bragged about getting Yovanovitch fired, should have lawsuits in his future.

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

If I paid Trump a million dollars to fire an Ambassador, is that okay?

Of course not.

If the son of the vice president was getting 83K per month from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company and the VP refused to release foreign aid unless the prosecutor investigating corruption at that gas company was fired, is that OK?

So ambassadors can’t be fired for any reason? That’s what I thought.

Was Hunter Biden paid to get the prosecutor fired? There’s no evidence to support that allegation.

you asked about a bribe, bribery is not legal, a president can fire anyone under him for any reason, but he cannot engage in a crime when doing it. Obama fired almost of all of Bush's appointees, did you bitch about that?

Hunter Biden was paid in order for that company to have access to the special treatment by the US government, WhyTF do you think they also hired the kids of Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney?

Joe Biden bribed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating corruption at the company that put those politician's kids on its payroll. He said "you have 6 hours to fire this guy or you won't get the money" How can you possibly think that is OK?

I just want you to acknowledge that a president can’t fire an ambassador for any reason.

Shokin was corrupt. He was wasting taxpayer money. Why should I want Biden investigated for getting him fired?

 

[Redfish]

Rudy Tutti should probably not throw stones in glass houses....

but its OK for Schiff to do that? I want to see Schiff under oath and asked about his dealings with the whistle blower.

Why?

The whistleblower did a service to our country

By making up a story? By lying? By conspiring with Schiff to create a fake report? How exactly is that a service to our country?

 

[Redfish]

ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, they can be fired for any reason. Obama fired hundreds.

If I paid Trump a million dollars to fire an Ambassador, is that okay?

Of course not.

If the son of the vice president was getting 83K per month from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company and the VP refused to release foreign aid unless the prosecutor investigating corruption at that gas company was fired, is that OK?

So ambassadors can’t be fired for any reason? That’s what I thought.

Was Hunter Biden paid to get the prosecutor fired? There’s no evidence to support that allegation.

you asked about a bribe, bribery is not legal, a president can fire anyone under him for any reason, but he cannot engage in a crime when doing it. Obama fired almost of all of Bush's appointees, did you bitch about that?

Hunter Biden was paid in order for that company to have access to the special treatment by the US government, WhyTF do you think they also hired the kids of Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney?

Joe Biden bribed Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating corruption at the company that put those politician's kids on its payroll. He said "you have 6 hours to fire this guy or you won't get the money" How can you possibly think that is OK?

I just want you to acknowledge that a president can’t fire an ambassador for any reason.

Shokin was corrupt. He was wasting taxpayer money. Why should I want Biden investigated for getting him fired?

Are you inside the Ukrainian government? HTF do you know he was corrupt, the entire government was corrupt and involved with Burisma in corruption.

Burisma hired the kids of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney to buy influence in the US government, are you so fricken stupid that you cannot see that?

and Yes, a president can fire an ambassador for any reason. But a president cannot commit a crime in so doing. In your example you asked if you could pay a president a million dollars to fire an ambassador. that would be a crime, so NO. and if you did, you would be indicted, tried and probably convicted.