Rush is about to get even richer thanks to LIB scum

[Luddly Neddite]

Third thread on this and no he's not.

Enlighten us with your infinite wisdom. Maybe you could give us a link that says he's not suing?

Read the link.

And, if he shuts up long enough, his attorneys will tell him there's nothing for him to sue about.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Third thread on this and no he's not.

Rush Limbaugh threatens to sue Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Fox News

His ratings and ad revenue must be down.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

What does he claim his damages are? Did he get fatter? Start the Oxy again? Lose ratings, income? Fuck no. God, what a gasbag he is.

 

[Vigilante]

Third thread on this and no he's not.

Rush Limbaugh threatens to sue Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Fox News

His ratings and ad revenue must be down.

Please post proof of that statement, or you're just more BULLSHIT, as you usually are!

 

[bodecea]

Limbaugh retained the services of lawyer Patty Glaser and demanded that the DCCC “preserve all records in anticipation of a lawsuit for defamation and interference” after the Democratic Party group led a campaign against Limbaugh based on out-of-context statements the host made about sexual assault. Limbaugh’s legal team delivered a letter to DCCC representatives Monday informing them of the legal threat. Limbaugh has also demanded a public apology.

Rush Limbaugh threatens to sue Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Fox News

Oh...please do.

 

[R.D.]

Third thread on this and no he's not.

Enlighten us with your infinite wisdom. Maybe you could give us a link that says he's not suing?

Read the link.

And, if he shuts up long enough, his attorneys will tell him there's nothing for him to sue about.

Read the link.

“The DCCC may believe it to be immune from liability by quoting words, taken out of context. This is untrue,” Glaser said. “There is significant on point precedent in the 9th Circuit for holding an organization responsible for falsifying meaning through selective quoting. In Price v. Stossel, the court held that, if a party accurately quotes ‘a statement actually made by a public figure, but presents the statement in a misleading context, thereby changing the viewer’s understanding of the speaker’s words,’ that constitutes defamation.”

 

[S.J.]

Third thread on this and no he's not.

Enlighten us with your infinite wisdom. Maybe you could give us a link that says he's not suing?

Read the link.

And, if he shuts up long enough, his attorneys will tell him there's nothing for him to sue about.

From the link.

Limbaugh’s team said that the DCCC’s campaign against Limbaugh provides grounds for a defamation case, based on legal precedent.

“The DCCC may believe it to be immune from liability by quoting words, taken out of context. This is untrue,” Glaser said. “There is significant on point precedent in the 9th Circuit for holding an organization responsible for falsifying meaning through selective quoting. In Price v. Stossel, the court held that, if a party accurately quotes ‘a statement actually made by a public figure, but presents the statement in a misleading context, thereby changing the viewer’s understanding of the speaker’s words,’ that constitutes defamation.”

 

[Vigilante]

What does he claim his damages are? Did he get fatter? Start the Oxy again? Lose ratings, income? Fuck no. God, what a gasbag he is.

Try the DNC LYING about what he said, while he has the tapes, and the DNC's comments... Slander, look it up you fucking moron!

 

[Vigilante]

What does he claim his damages are? Did he get fatter? Start the Oxy again? Lose ratings, income? Fuck no. God, what a gasbag he is.

Try the DNC LYING about what he said, while he has the tapes, and the DNC's comments... Slander, look it up you fucking moron!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good for him.

It's about time someone sued these filthy demagogues.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good for him.

It's about time someone sued these filthy demagogues.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Limbaugh's lawyer is relying on an appeals court ruling that doesn't say what he thinks it does.

Not to mention, the irony of Limbaugh suing for someone taking his words out of context is quite amazing, since taking words out of context to create fake outrage is what Limbaugh does for a living.

 

[Vigilante]

Limbaugh's lawyer is relying on an appeals court ruling that doesn't say what he thinks it does.

Not to mention, the irony of Limbaugh suing for someone taking his words out of context is quite amazing, since taking words out of context to create fake outrage is what Limbaugh does for a living.

Have a few examples?

 

[Vigilante]

Limbaugh's lawyer is relying on an appeals court ruling that doesn't say what he thinks it does.

Not to mention, the irony of Limbaugh suing for someone taking his words out of context is quite amazing, since taking words out of context to create fake outrage is what Limbaugh does for a living.

Have a few examples?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Limbaugh's lawyer is relying on an appeals court ruling that doesn't say what he thinks it does.

Not to mention, the irony of Limbaugh suing for someone taking his words out of context is quite amazing, since taking words out of context to create fake outrage is what Limbaugh does for a living.

Your party is one of demagogues. Slander and libel are really all the democrats have to offer America. There is no restraint at all on what filth the democrats will spew, If Limbaugh or anyone else can slap the filthy democrats with a defamation suit and win, I will applaud. If it can cut the lies from the left down by even 1%, it will be a huge relief.

 

[Political Junky]

Rush is a public figure, he can't sue.

 

[Vigilante]

Rush is a public figure, he can't sue.

Of course he can, how do you think celebrities make the news headline when suing? Here's only about a million links to that fact!

celebrity sues for slander - Bing

 

[Vigilante]

Rush is a public figure, he can't sue.

Of course he cam, how do you think celebrities make the news headline when suing?

celebrity sues for slander - Bing

 

[edthecynic]

The lying crybaby is always "threatening" to sue somebody for publicity to get his sinking ratings up, and he never does it because he would be deposed and the worthless liar would have to testify under oath!

 

[Vigilante]

The lying crybaby is always "threatening" to sue somebody for publicity to get his sinking ratings up, and he never does it because he would be deposed and the worthless liar would have to testify under oath!

Post 6 incidents with links to the supposed fact Rush is always threatening to sue, should be easy for Edtheasshole to do since Rush is ALWAYS DOING IT!... or are you just fucking lying .....again?