Rush Reports Zimmerman Arrested again

[Kroyd]

Uh oh! Dante Fevah

He's your own personal Kroyd 'rhoid!

His days are numbered

Oh well

By the way, do you have something relevant to the thread to add? I think Z was arrested because his girlfriend called 911. That's My Opinion!!!

!!!

 

[Kroyd]

Rush reports Zimmerman arrested again.

Okay, here it is.

George Zimmerman, acquitted in July in the fatal shooting of black teenager Trayvon Martin, was arrested Monday in Seminole County Fla., authorities said.

"He is in custody," officer Green, with the county sheriff's office told USA TODAY. He said the booking officer was still filing his report and he had no additional information.

The Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman was en route to the Seminole County Jail in Sanford, according to Sheriff Don Eslinger. The Sentinel said it was not clear what happened or what crime he's accused of committing.

WESH-TV reported that Zimmerman was accused of domestic violence by a girlfriend in the unincorporated area of Apopka.

Zimmerman, 30, was a neighborhood watch in a gated community in Sanford, Fla., when he shot Trayvon, 17, on Feb. 26, 2012. The shooting touched off protests across the nation. Some of the wrath targeted the state's Stand Your Ground statute, although Zimmerman's lawyers opted to rely on a more standard self-defense argument at trial.

Zimmerman accused of pointing shotgun at girlfriend

He's a DICK HEAD

That's basically what his girl said in the 911 call.

 

[theliq]

Who gives a shit about George? We were talking about you.

George said it, so the insults apply to George.

Go away Booty Boop, nobody mentioned your "boobs"...

That's RUDE

 

[Kroyd]

George said it, so the insults apply to George.

Go away Booty Boop, nobody mentioned your "boobs"...

That's RUDE

And so are sausage biscuits...

 

[Kroyd]

Goddamnit! Now I want sausage biscuits!!!

 

[theliq]

Go away Booty Boop, nobody mentioned your "boobs"...

That's RUDE

And so are sausage biscuits...

!!!!!???????

 

[Kroyd]

That's RUDE

And so are sausage biscuits...

!!!!!???????

I like sausage biscuits????

!!!????

"RUDE" is cool too?

 

[Mustang]

You really are a dumbfuck! No one holds the leftist Obama voter as a right wing hero! Rather, we didn't want to see a perversion of justice for a black thug, simply because the perpetrator was non-black. The media, liberals and blacks wasn't to lynch and innocent man because of race. Right wingers don't see race when it comes to justice. They are color blind. That didn't carry that Zimmerman was a flaming liberal Obama supporter, they carried that people were trying to put an innocent man in jail simply because he was the wrong race!

Can't a fucko like you see that?

GZ wasn't innocent. He killed an unarmed kid. He was just found legally not guilty because there was insufficient evidence to convict him, which is not surprising since there were no witnesses. But legally not guilty is not the same thing as being innocent.

GZ wasn't innocent. He killed an unarmed kid. He was just found legally not guilty because there was insufficient evidence to convict him

not in this case

he was found to be innocent

and to have acted lawfully

in the justifiable use of deadly force

You're wrong. A jury does not make a finding of innocence. They return a verdict of either guilty or not guilty.

 

[Katzndogz]

Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide.

Get used to it, you will see many more cases very soon.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide.

Get used to it, you will see many more cases very soon.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-zCci2aZ5Q]Breaking News: Watch the Zimmerman verdict read in court - YouTube[/ame]


At this point the verdict is just "not guilty", the jury did not and is not required to provide a reason for their verdict. It very well could have been "not quilty" based on lack of evidence.

With the jury verdict in the case, there is no "by reason of" stated.

"Dismissed" as a justifiable homicide is actually based on a Self Defense hearing before a Judge and the Judge then issues a ruling. Zimmerman waived the Self-Defense hearing because he would have had to take the stand and testify and O'Mara wanted him no where near the stand and subject to cross examination as such testimony would then have been admissible during the criminal trial (if the ruling went against them).

At this point, technically speaking, Zimmerman doesn't have immunity from a civil suit. If one were to be filed though, then one of the first things the defense would do is petition for dismissal based on self defense. IF the Judge were to dismiss the case, then he would have immunity against future suits because the Judge would have established that self defense would apply.


>>>>

 

[Katzndogz]

At this point there has been no immunity hearing so the Martin family has the right to file a civil suit. They haven't and they won't. Zimmerman would win an immunity hearing as soon as it got in front of a judge. Then, according to Florida law, the plaintiff in the civil suit has to pay all attorney fees and court costs.

Zimmerman did not waive an immunity hearing. He reserved the right to the hearing.

This is Florida, they don't dismiss cases based on self defense. They have a pretrial immunity hearing.

 

[Katzndogz]

No civil suit. No federal violation of civil rights charges. Liberals got nowhere to go.

 

[Asclepias]

No civil suit. No federal violation of civil rights charges. Liberals got nowhere to go.

Everyone has front row seats to the trainwreck called GZ. He is providing a reality show before he implodes.

 

[WorldWatcher]

At this point there has been no immunity hearing so the Martin family has the right to file a civil suit. They haven't and they won't. Zimmerman would win an immunity hearing as soon as it got in front of a judge. Then, according to Florida law, the plaintiff in the civil suit has to pay all attorney fees and court costs.

Which is pretty much what I said. You said before "Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide", that was in fact incorrect, the jury made no such finding. And at this point no such ruling has been made by a Judge.

Zimmerman did not waive an immunity hearing. He reserved the right to the hearing.

Yes he did waive the Self-defense hearing as part of the criminal precedings, that doesn't mean he doesn't get to make the self-defense motion if there were civil litigation.

But ya, he did waive it for the criminal trial.

This is Florida, they don't dismiss cases based on self defense. They have a pretrial immunity hearing.

The self-defense hearing (or as you call it the immunity hearing) determines if the homicide was justified be reason of the defendant presenting an affirmative defense of "self-defense". The "immunity" the Judge is ruling on is based on "self-defense".



?>>>>

 

[Politico]

Uh oh! Dante Fevah

He's your own personal Kroyd 'rhoid!

His days are numbered

Oh well

And they are up. I even tried to warn him.

 

[Politico]

Exactly what I said. You're all a bunch of posers with no substance whose concern goes as far as your keyboards.

In other words - you don't have a point....

Same as it ever was.

Tru dat. In order to have a new point the faux indignance would need to change.

 

[jon_berzerk]

At this point there has been no immunity hearing so the Martin family has the right to file a civil suit. They haven't and they won't. Zimmerman would win an immunity hearing as soon as it got in front of a judge. Then, according to Florida law, the plaintiff in the civil suit has to pay all attorney fees and court costs.

Which is pretty much what I said. You said before "Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide", that was in fact incorrect, the jury made no such finding. And at this point no such ruling has been made by a Judge.

Zimmerman did not waive an immunity hearing. He reserved the right to the hearing.

Yes he did waive the Self-defense hearing as part of the criminal precedings, that doesn't mean he doesn't get to make the self-defense motion if there were civil litigation.

But ya, he did waive it for the criminal trial.

This is Florida, they don't dismiss cases based on self defense. They have a pretrial immunity hearing.

The self-defense hearing (or as you call it the immunity hearing) determines if the homicide was justified be reason of the defendant presenting an affirmative defense of "self-defense". The "immunity" the Judge is ruling on is based on "self-defense".



?>>>>

according to the instructions to the jury


zimmerman presumed innocent of the charges

PLEA OF NOT GUILTY; REASONABLE DOUBT; AND BURDEN OF PROOF

George Zimmerman has entered a plea of not guilty. This means you must presume or
believe George Zimmerman is innocent. The presumption stays with George Zimmerman as to each material allegation in the Information through each stage of the trial unless it has been
overcome by the evidence to the exclusion of and beyond a reasonable doubt.


http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/jury_instructions_1.pdf

zimmerman did not waive his right to an "immunity hearing" in the future

should the need arise to use it

 

[WorldWatcher]

At this point there has been no immunity hearing so the Martin family has the right to file a civil suit. They haven't and they won't. Zimmerman would win an immunity hearing as soon as it got in front of a judge. Then, according to Florida law, the plaintiff in the civil suit has to pay all attorney fees and court costs.

Which is pretty much what I said. You said before "Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide", that was in fact incorrect, the jury made no such finding. And at this point no such ruling has been made by a Judge.



Yes he did waive the Self-defense hearing as part of the criminal precedings, that doesn't mean he doesn't get to make the self-defense motion if there were civil litigation.

But ya, he did waive it for the criminal trial.

This is Florida, they don't dismiss cases based on self defense. They have a pretrial immunity hearing.

The self-defense hearing (or as you call it the immunity hearing) determines if the homicide was justified be reason of the defendant presenting an affirmative defense of "self-defense". The "immunity" the Judge is ruling on is based on "self-defense".



?>>>>

according to the instructions to the jury


zimmerman presumed innocent of the charges

PLEA OF NOT GUILTY; REASONABLE DOUBT; AND BURDEN OF PROOF

George Zimmerman has entered a plea of not guilty. This means you must presume or
believe George Zimmerman is innocent. The presumption stays with George Zimmerman as to each material allegation in the Information through each stage of the trial unless it has been
overcome by the evidence to the exclusion of and beyond a reasonable doubt.


http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/jury_instructions_1.pdf

zimmerman did not waive his right to an "immunity hearing" in the future

should the need arise to use it

Correct, which is what I said, he waived it in the criminal proceeding and opted to go directly to trial.

If a civil suit were ever to be filed, then the defense would file a motion to dismissed based on self-defense, both side would submit their briefs, possibly there would be in in-court hearing (or there could be a summary decision), and the judge would issue a ruling.


>>>>

 

[jon_berzerk]

Which is pretty much what I said. You said before "Not guilty by reason of justifiable homicide", that was in fact incorrect, the jury made no such finding. And at this point no such ruling has been made by a Judge.



Yes he did waive the Self-defense hearing as part of the criminal precedings, that doesn't mean he doesn't get to make the self-defense motion if there were civil litigation.

But ya, he did waive it for the criminal trial.



The self-defense hearing (or as you call it the immunity hearing) determines if the homicide was justified be reason of the defendant presenting an affirmative defense of "self-defense". The "immunity" the Judge is ruling on is based on "self-defense".



?>>>>

according to the instructions to the jury


zimmerman presumed innocent of the charges

PLEA OF NOT GUILTY; REASONABLE DOUBT; AND BURDEN OF PROOF

George Zimmerman has entered a plea of not guilty. This means you must presume or
believe George Zimmerman is innocent. The presumption stays with George Zimmerman as to each material allegation in the Information through each stage of the trial unless it has been
overcome by the evidence to the exclusion of and beyond a reasonable doubt.


http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/07/12/jury_instructions_1.pdf

zimmerman did not waive his right to an "immunity hearing" in the future

should the need arise to use it

Correct, which is what I said, he waived it in the criminal proceeding and opted to go directly to trial.

If a civil suit were ever to be filed, then the defense would file a motion to dismissed based on self-defense, both side would submit their briefs, possibly there would be in in-court hearing (or there could be a summary decision), and the judge would issue a ruling.


>>>>

yup

did you happen to see how broke zimmerman is

-2.5 million in the hole

 

[Old Rocks]

Considering the present path that Zimmermann is on, the 2.5 million in the hole will pale beside the physical hole he will be in. This guy is headed for prison or the gallows. Something badly wrong with his mental processes.