edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
Then waterboard Rotten Cotton.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then waterboard Rotten Cotton.
What do you know, you know nothing.MORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
The only thing torture is good for is intimidation. But it's great for false confessions!
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, witnessed that torture does work. You obviously lack the education to know who this is, as does everyone else who thinks torture does not work.
You DON'T think; you react like a paramecium.I think should simply bury Muslims alive...or shoot them...or rape them.
You know, like they do to each other and non-Muslims.
I think you belong in a padded room, far away from civilization so you can't hurt anyone.
Trump appointed "seasoned Military Generals" and the democrat party tried to stop them. The "waterboarding" technique has been on the psy-op book since WW2. Our own elite Military teams go through it in training. The sissie left decided to call it torture when it became obvious that it worked. As we used to say, more people drowned in senator Kennedy's car than during waterboarding.
Liar. There is ZERO evidence it works.
Liar. In fact, if not for torture, Bin Laden may still be alive today.
Correction: If it weren't for a Democrat, Bin Laden would still be alive today.
What does a Democrat have to do with it? All big-ears did was continue where Bush left off. But again, waterboarding played a part (when Bush was in charge) in getting the information needed to find Bin Laden. Need the video, just ask, I have it right here.
We all know what Bush said about Bin Laden. He didn't "leave off," he said he simply "didn't spend much time thinking about him." Remember that? Or do you need a refill on your memory pills?
Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.The Senate Intelligence Committee for oneMORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
2. Torture doesn't work very well
"The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information," according to the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
The report debunks the top 20 examples CIA has used to defend the now-shuttered enhanced interrogation program, claiming that each of the examples "was found to be wrong in fundamental respects."
Additionally, false confessions obtained by enhanced interrogation techniques from detainees led the CIA to pursue dead leads that did not help in the fight against al-Qaeda. Information the CIA obtained through these harsh interrogations, which in some cases amounted to torture, was either false or had been previously obtained through alternative intelligence gathering, according to the report.
"While being subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques and afterwards, multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence," the report reads.
Top takeaways from the CIA torture report - CNNPolitics.com
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and...
So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
Thank you for confirming my post, torture does work. To state it does not work well, is very different then saying it does not work. Now let's define what they mean by "Doesn't work very well". Certainly the Senate Intelligence Committee would agree that torture works, otherwise they would of stated; "2. Torture does not work."The Senate Intelligence Committee for oneMORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
2. Torture doesn't work very well
".
He would say it works. That's why McCain is so agsinst torture. It was used on him and it worked. He admitted it.Torture does absolutely work. Ask John McCain, torture absolutely worked on him. It was awful. McCain endured incomprehensible pain. As he said himself, it broke him.
Torture and waterboarding worked on Kahlid Shiek Mohammed. That's how we got the identity of Bin Laden's courier.
The Constitution has a prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. That means the punishment must be both cruel and unusual. It can be cruel, it can be unusual but it cannot be both.
Uh, yeah....let's ask John McCain what he says about torture "working," the guy who's spent the last decade working to PREVENT the USA from using torture in interrogations. Let's ask the guy who wrote an anti-torture law barring all US officials from waterboarding or any enhanced interrogation techniques.
Let's see what he has to say about it....you fucking moron.
He's been waterboarded as part of his training.Then waterboard Rotten Cotton.
We've elected the dumbest person alive. This IDIOT thinks he knows more than seasoned military generals.
Trump on waterboarding: 'We have to fight fire with fire' - CNNPolitics.com
Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.The Senate Intelligence Committee for oneMORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
2. Torture doesn't work very well
"The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information," according to the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
The report debunks the top 20 examples CIA has used to defend the now-shuttered enhanced interrogation program, claiming that each of the examples "was found to be wrong in fundamental respects."
Additionally, false confessions obtained by enhanced interrogation techniques from detainees led the CIA to pursue dead leads that did not help in the fight against al-Qaeda. Information the CIA obtained through these harsh interrogations, which in some cases amounted to torture, was either false or had been previously obtained through alternative intelligence gathering, according to the report.
"While being subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques and afterwards, multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence," the report reads.
Top takeaways from the CIA torture report - CNNPolitics.com
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and...
So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
I'm sure, though, that you have some Alternative Facts.
No...it's telling you that you can't trust the information you get.Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.The Senate Intelligence Committee for oneMORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
2. Torture doesn't work very well
"The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information," according to the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
The report debunks the top 20 examples CIA has used to defend the now-shuttered enhanced interrogation program, claiming that each of the examples "was found to be wrong in fundamental respects."
Additionally, false confessions obtained by enhanced interrogation techniques from detainees led the CIA to pursue dead leads that did not help in the fight against al-Qaeda. Information the CIA obtained through these harsh interrogations, which in some cases amounted to torture, was either false or had been previously obtained through alternative intelligence gathering, according to the report.
"While being subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques and afterwards, multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence," the report reads.
Top takeaways from the CIA torture report - CNNPolitics.com
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and...
So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
I'm sure, though, that you have some Alternative Facts.
So, these people are telling you that yes, SOME of the information we got was good, BUT that information just happened to be duplicate information that we already knew.
How the fuck did that just happen?
What we are seeing here, is government drones telling their bosses what their bosses want to hear.
No...it's telling you that you can't trust the information you get.Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.The Senate Intelligence Committee for oneMORONS!!!!!!
Who is saying Torture does not work? HISTORY disagrees with you!!!!!
2. Torture doesn't work very well
"The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information," according to the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
The report debunks the top 20 examples CIA has used to defend the now-shuttered enhanced interrogation program, claiming that each of the examples "was found to be wrong in fundamental respects."
Additionally, false confessions obtained by enhanced interrogation techniques from detainees led the CIA to pursue dead leads that did not help in the fight against al-Qaeda. Information the CIA obtained through these harsh interrogations, which in some cases amounted to torture, was either false or had been previously obtained through alternative intelligence gathering, according to the report.
"While being subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques and afterwards, multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence," the report reads.
Top takeaways from the CIA torture report - CNNPolitics.com
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and...
So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
I'm sure, though, that you have some Alternative Facts.
So, these people are telling you that yes, SOME of the information we got was good, BUT that information just happened to be duplicate information that we already knew.
How the fuck did that just happen?
What we are seeing here, is government drones telling their bosses what their bosses want to hear.
It's quite clear.
“So I am begging the president, share with us the information you have about this or please stop saying it. As a matter of fact, I’d like you do more than stop saying it, I’d like you to come forward and say, ‘Having looked at it, I am confident the election was fair and accurate and people who voted voted legally.’ ‘Cause if he doesn’t do that, this is going to undermine his ability to govern this country.”
— Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), quoted by The Hill.
The Emperor is Actually Crazy
Paul Krugman is right to call the new president “mentally ill.” And now we’ll have a major investigation of voter fraud for no other reason than to accommodate his illness. We may, perhaps, build his damned wall for the same reason.
We will all try to carry on like this is okay…like it is sustainable.
“So I am begging the president, share with us the information you have about this or please stop saying it. As a matter of fact, I’d like you do more than stop saying it, I’d like you to come forward and say, ‘Having looked at it, I am confident the election was fair and accurate and people who voted voted legally.’ ‘Cause if he doesn’t do that, this is going to undermine his ability to govern this country.”
— Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), quoted by The Hill.
The Emperor is Actually Crazy
Paul Krugman is right to call the new president “mentally ill.” And now we’ll have a major investigation of voter fraud for no other reason than to accommodate his illness. We may, perhaps, build his damned wall for the same reason.
We will all try to carry on like this is okay…like it is sustainable.
They're saying that you get no new reliable information through torture.No...it's telling you that you can't trust the information you get.Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.The Senate Intelligence Committee for one
2. Torture doesn't work very well
"The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information," according to the Senate Intelligence Committee report.
The report debunks the top 20 examples CIA has used to defend the now-shuttered enhanced interrogation program, claiming that each of the examples "was found to be wrong in fundamental respects."
Additionally, false confessions obtained by enhanced interrogation techniques from detainees led the CIA to pursue dead leads that did not help in the fight against al-Qaeda. Information the CIA obtained through these harsh interrogations, which in some cases amounted to torture, was either false or had been previously obtained through alternative intelligence gathering, according to the report.
"While being subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques and afterwards, multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence," the report reads.
Top takeaways from the CIA torture report - CNNPolitics.com
Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and...
So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
I'm sure, though, that you have some Alternative Facts.
So, these people are telling you that yes, SOME of the information we got was good, BUT that information just happened to be duplicate information that we already knew.
How the fuck did that just happen?
What we are seeing here, is government drones telling their bosses what their bosses want to hear.
It's quite clear.
You obviously can't trust ANY information that you get from an enemy.
All of it must be checked out.
That these people act as though information gained from enemies though other forms of interrogation is to be trusted at face value is a lie designed to fool only those who are actively and willingly suspending disbelief.
They're saying that you get no new reliable information through torture.No...it's telling you that you can't trust the information you get.Yeah, I know...you disagree so it's obviously False News.So, it was either false or was duplicated? Really? The truth stuff was all duplicate information? That's really incredible.
As in not credible,
and misses the point that no information collected from enemies is to be trusted. Obviously.
I'm sure, though, that you have some Alternative Facts.
So, these people are telling you that yes, SOME of the information we got was good, BUT that information just happened to be duplicate information that we already knew.
How the fuck did that just happen?
What we are seeing here, is government drones telling their bosses what their bosses want to hear.
It's quite clear.
You obviously can't trust ANY information that you get from an enemy.
All of it must be checked out.
That these people act as though information gained from enemies though other forms of interrogation is to be trusted at face value is a lie designed to fool only those who are actively and willingly suspending disbelief.
So why would you do it?