Russian Facebook ads

[Disir]

I keep hearing a lot of talk about them but I have not seen any. Has anyone seen anything more than a description or claim?

Do you really think these adds will be like "we're Russian, we want you to vote for Trump"?

How bloody clever do you think they are? Won't know unless we can see them.

Maybe you HAVE seen them and you didn't know it was theirs.

Or I didn't see them at all.

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

 

[Lewdog]

The pedophile angle is a tool used by Russia.

Russia Plants Child Porn on Enemies' Computers

Foes of Russia Say Child Pornography Is Planted to Ruin Them

I'll use an argument that Trump supporters love to use. Prove Russia didn't do it.

You mean like Milo?

You don't have a case.

Prove it. Prove Russia didn't do it.

Break out the evidence. Talk the two bit con man into releasing what he has.

Sorry, I'm still waiting on you to prove it wasn't Russia.

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Do you really think these adds will be like "we're Russian, we want you to vote for Trump"?

How bloody clever do you think they are? Won't know unless we can see them.

Maybe you HAVE seen them and you didn't know it was theirs.

Or I didn't see them at all.

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

 

[Disir]

You mean like Milo?

You don't have a case.

Prove it. Prove Russia didn't do it.

Break out the evidence. Talk the two bit con man into releasing what he has.

Sorry, I'm still waiting on you to prove it wasn't Russia.

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

 

[Disir]

How bloody clever do you think they are? Won't know unless we can see them.

Maybe you HAVE seen them and you didn't know it was theirs.

Or I didn't see them at all.

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

They need to be released to the public.

 

[sartre play]

The crazy part is that people could be so hate full that they would think Any one could be running a child sex ring out of a pizza places basement that has no basement. police would discredit it as soon as a complaint was filed. I feel bad for the dumb guy that paid the price of losing his family & going to jail because some ass was trying to play political games with peoples life's.

 

[Lewdog]

Prove it. Prove Russia didn't do it.

Break out the evidence. Talk the two bit con man into releasing what he has.

Sorry, I'm still waiting on you to prove it wasn't Russia.

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

 

[Disir]

Break out the evidence. Talk the two bit con man into releasing what he has.

Sorry, I'm still waiting on you to prove it wasn't Russia.

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

 

[Lewdog]

Sorry, I'm still waiting on you to prove it wasn't Russia.

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

 

[Disir]

Not my job.

You don't have a case. You know you don't have a case. Suck it up, buttercup.

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

Not my job to provide it. You keep making claims that you can't back up. Not my job to do it for you.

 

[Lewdog]

You are saying that Russia didn't do it. Prove that. Do you always go around making claims and then not prove it?

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

Not my job to provide it. You keep making claims that you can't back up. Not my job to do it for you.

I'm not asking you to do my job and provide evidence Russia did it. You are saying they didn't do it, therefore it is your responsibility to prove they didn't.

 

[Disir]

I'm telling you that you are not providing any evidence. Considering what your degree is in, that is kind of scary.

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

Not my job to provide it. You keep making claims that you can't back up. Not my job to do it for you.

I'm not asking you to do my job and provide evidence Russia did it. You are saying they didn't do it, therefore it is your responsibility to prove they didn't.

Provide evidence Russia did it. You made the claim they were behind it. You got nothing. Again.

 

[Lewdog]

I've provide a 1,000 more evidence than you.

I'm simply using the "Trump supporter" discussion technique, where you have to prove a negative in the argument. You have to prove Russia didn't do it, and as of yet you haven't shown a shred of evidence.

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

Not my job to provide it. You keep making claims that you can't back up. Not my job to do it for you.

I'm not asking you to do my job and provide evidence Russia did it. You are saying they didn't do it, therefore it is your responsibility to prove they didn't.

Provide evidence Russia did it. You made the claim they were behind it. You got nothing. Again.

It's obvious you can't prove they didn't do it despite you saying they didn't do it. Have a good night. You should spend some more time doing research if you are going to take such positions.

 

[sartre play]

It is Fact is that Russia did try & disrupt our election, what is not fact yet is how much, to what advantage, & if any Americans where involved.

 

[Disir]

I'm not a Trump supporter. Try again.

Still no evidence from you.

Not my job to provide it. You keep making claims that you can't back up. Not my job to do it for you.

I'm not asking you to do my job and provide evidence Russia did it. You are saying they didn't do it, therefore it is your responsibility to prove they didn't.

Provide evidence Russia did it. You made the claim they were behind it. You got nothing. Again.

It's obvious you can't prove they didn't do it despite you saying they didn't do it. Have a good night. You should spend some more time doing research if you are going to take such positions.

Lew, you're an idiot. You can't back up your claims. It's noted.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe you HAVE seen them and you didn't know it was theirs.

Or I didn't see them at all.

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

They need to be released to the public.

They were released to the public.

 

[Disir]

Or I didn't see them at all.

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

They need to be released to the public.

They were released to the public.

Facebook has repeatedly brushed off calls to make the ads public, with a spokesperson telling Business Insider earlier this month that "Due to both federal law and the fact that investigations are ongoing with the relevant authorities, we’re unable to share the ads." However, when pressed by the publication, the company refused to specify which laws (if any) prevented them from releasing the ads.



What's more, Sen. Mark Warner has explicitly called for Facebook to make the advertisements public. "They shared the content with staff," Gizmodo reports him telling press earlier this month, "but the public deserves to look at that content.”
Mark Zuckerberg's refusal to make Russia-linked Facebook ads public is a disgrace

 

[John Shaw]

One of the Russian-funded Facebook and Twitter groups was called Blacktivist. I remember that one.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Possibly, but you don't know whether you have or not.

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

They need to be released to the public.

They were released to the public.

Facebook has repeatedly brushed off calls to make the ads public, with a spokesperson telling Business Insider earlier this month that "Due to both federal law and the fact that investigations are ongoing with the relevant authorities, we’re unable to share the ads." However, when pressed by the publication, the company refused to specify which laws (if any) prevented them from releasing the ads.



What's more, Sen. Mark Warner has explicitly called for Facebook to make the advertisements public. "They shared the content with staff," Gizmodo reports him telling press earlier this month, "but the public deserves to look at that content.”
Mark Zuckerberg's refusal to make Russia-linked Facebook ads public is a disgrace

Okay, and?

Why do you want them released to the public? So you can... can... can what?

 

[Lewdog]

Then I guess we will need to see them.

What do you mean "need to see them"? I'm sure you wouldn't die without seeing them.

They need to be released to the public.

They were released to the public.

Facebook has repeatedly brushed off calls to make the ads public, with a spokesperson telling Business Insider earlier this month that "Due to both federal law and the fact that investigations are ongoing with the relevant authorities, we’re unable to share the ads." However, when pressed by the publication, the company refused to specify which laws (if any) prevented them from releasing the ads.



What's more, Sen. Mark Warner has explicitly called for Facebook to make the advertisements public. "They shared the content with staff," Gizmodo reports him telling press earlier this month, "but the public deserves to look at that content.”
Mark Zuckerberg's refusal to make Russia-linked Facebook ads public is a disgrace

Okay, and?

Why do you want them released to the public? So you can... can... can what?

You know when/if they release them to the public it won't make a difference. People will just say that the FBI is making it up, or that Facebook sent them fake evidence because Zuckerberg is a Democrat.