Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's review: Sandra Fluke never testified before any committee. That was a put up job and rubes like you fell for it.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
Rush correctly characterized her. But Rush speaks only for Rush and he was one opinion.
Sarah Palin demonstrated she had a better grasp on foreign policy than Obama. She was demonized by the left wing popular media, who fantasized about raping her etc.
And since when is raising money for political speech a bad thing? I thought that was protected by the Constitution.
Revisionist idiot!
It wasn't a Congressional committee. It was a panel put together by Nancy Pelosi. That is a put up job.In the latest installment of our In Context feature, here are the full remarks of Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke, testifying before a Democratic congressional panel convened by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, on contraception coverage and women's health.]
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
Your machete is as dull as you are.Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
I can't hear you. I'm getting drowned out by the rightwing applause for Hillary Clinton's political aspirations.
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
I can't hear you. I'm getting drowned out by the rightwing applause for Hillary Clinton's political aspirations.
Again, YOU belong to the party that espouses feminist ideals, tolerance for differences, etc.
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
I can't hear you. I'm getting drowned out by the rightwing applause for Hillary Clinton's political aspirations.
Again, YOU belong to the party that espouses feminist ideals, tolerance for differences, etc.
Okay, now you're acknowledging that the Right does not espouse those ideas.
Sarah Palin is in that crowd.
lol
I didn't see Fluke attacking other people, only voicing a political positionIt's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Well, for me, she at least earns points for being a tough lady. It is still very difficult for women to get ahead in politics. I find some of the comments about Sarah to be really terrible, considering, especially for those who espouse feminism as a part of their belief system. It is just rotten, IMO.
Don't agree with her views fine, but you should at least respect the fact that she has gone far as a woman politician. Like it or not that means something.
There are dozens of female politicans who have accomplished more. Both Democrat and Republican
Sure, but Ms. Palin has still accomplished a lot too.
Palin also only voiced political opinions.I didn't see Fluke attacking other people, only voicing a political positionIt's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
do you say the same about HRC? or do you think that any attack on her is sexist?
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
Let me reiterate. We do not hate Sarah Palin! We do not fear Sarah Palin. We pity her and her few acolytes for their willful ignorance.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
the difference is that Palin is using your hatred of her to get very rich. Fluke is too stupid to do that.
bottom line, Palin is smart, Fluke is stupid, and you fools enable both of them
And I include you in that 'willful ignorance' group. In your post you posited "Palin is smart" despite all evidence to the contrary.
I certainly do!Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
No, you completely miss the point and ignore your own hypocrisy. YOU belong to the party the espouses feminist ideals.
Let me reiterate. We do not hate Sarah Palin! We do not fear Sarah Palin. We pity her and her few acolytes for their willful ignorance.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
the difference is that Palin is using your hatred of her to get very rich. Fluke is too stupid to do that.
bottom line, Palin is smart, Fluke is stupid, and you fools enable both of them
And I include you in that 'willful ignorance' group. In your post you posited "Palin is smart" despite all evidence to the contrary.
I certainly do!Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
No, you completely miss the point and ignore your own hypocrisy. YOU belong to the party the espouses feminist ideals.
You see, Sandra Fluke provided testimony and was "bullied" by the Right Wing. You accused me of bullying Sarah Palin.
But Sarah Palin was the nominee for Vice President. After that bullet was dodged, Ms. Palin kept making political statements that were largely foolish. She raises money to spread her message of willful ignorance. She DESERVES to be ridiculed.
Ms. Fluke did nothing to deserve the wrath and scorn and bullying she received at the hands of Limbaugh and those who agree with him.
So, deepening political division, gridlock, uncompromising positions and most of all money is what you consider "smart"? Where did you learn these values?Let me reiterate. We do not hate Sarah Palin! We do not fear Sarah Palin. We pity her and her few acolytes for their willful ignorance.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
the difference is that Palin is using your hatred of her to get very rich. Fluke is too stupid to do that.
bottom line, Palin is smart, Fluke is stupid, and you fools enable both of them
And I include you in that 'willful ignorance' group. In your post you posited "Palin is smart" despite all evidence to the contrary.
If using your opponents to get rich is smart, then Palin is smart.
To whom are you referring, Palin or Fluke?I certainly do!Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
No, you completely miss the point and ignore your own hypocrisy. YOU belong to the party the espouses feminist ideals.
You see, Sandra Fluke provided testimony and was "bullied" by the Right Wing. You accused me of bullying Sarah Palin.
But Sarah Palin was the nominee for Vice President. After that bullet was dodged, Ms. Palin kept making political statements that were largely foolish. She raises money to spread her message of willful ignorance. She DESERVES to be ridiculed.
Ms. Fluke did nothing to deserve the wrath and scorn and bullying she received at the hands of Limbaugh and those who agree with him.
Bullied? You mean "mocked" right?
I certainly do!Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.
Yeah. They're the same.
It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
No, you completely miss the point and ignore your own hypocrisy. YOU belong to the party the espouses feminist ideals.
You see, Sandra Fluke provided testimony and was "bullied" by the Right Wing. You accused me of bullying Sarah Palin.
But Sarah Palin was the nominee for Vice President. After that bullet was dodged, Ms. Palin kept making political statements that were largely foolish. She raises money to spread her message of willful ignorance. She DESERVES to be ridiculed.
Ms. Fluke did nothing to deserve the wrath and scorn and bullying she received at the hands of Limbaugh and those who agree with him.
