Sarah Palin Says She's Hoping To Run For Office Again

Well, for me, she at least earns points for being a tough lady. It is still very difficult for women to get ahead in politics. I find some of the comments about Sarah to be really terrible, considering, especially for those who espouse feminism as a part of their belief system. It is just rotten, IMO.

Don't agree with her views fine, but you should at least respect the fact that she has gone far as a woman politician. Like it or not that means something.


liberals hate successful women. liberal women are required to be dependent on the government, pro-abortion, and lesbian. Successful women with families are a threat to the liberal agenda.

I just don't ever remember seeing this level of hatred and disrespect for a person. I've found it interesting from the beginning.


their hate is driven by fear. Palin represents everything that the dems are against. Independent women, successful women, conservative women, family oriented women, smart women, attractive women.

A nation of Palin-like women would destroy the liberal agenda, and the libs know it.


Not destroy it.

Just offer reasonable alternatives.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, says she hopes to run for office again and is urging GOP leaders to have "more guts" as they pursue their agenda.

Palin said in an interview with Fox Business Network on Tuesday that she is invigorated by her critics, who make her "want to work so hard for justice in this country."

"The more they're pouring on the more I'm going to bug the crap out of them by being out there with a voice, with the message, hopefully running for office in the future, too," Palin said.

Palin decided not to seek the presidency in 2012 but remains a popular figure among conservatives. She hasn't held office since resigning as governor in 2009 during her first and only term.

More: Sarah Palin Says She's Hoping To Run For Office Again

I'm also hoping she runs for office again. So are late-night comedians. Run, Sarah, run! Please...

This is the real war on women.

Democrats are conducting one on any woman who dares to run for office as anything other than a Democrat.
th
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
 
Please carefully review what I posted. Here's where that 'reading and writing' stuff finally pays off.

I read it. Point being, Sarah is also not on the national ticket as a nominee. As I said, she is nothing more than an outspoken private citizen who, for some strange reason, really bothers the liberals. So . . . why the need to ridicule her? Or is that just how you roll whenever you disagree with someone? Perhaps that's the "bully" in you.
Actually, if you keep it under your hat, I'll tell you why Liberals ridicule Sarah Palin. As it turns out, a memo from our Dear Leader, the Muslim, Kenyan-born, Socialist AntiChrist instructed us to aim our blind hatred at Sarah Palin. That's why we're such mean bullies!

Meh, this is not clever at all. It is actually quite predictable. You've got no valid response, so you resort to being ridiculous. :D
Much like Palin and her acolytes.
sarah-palin-foot-in-mouth.jpg

Well, Obama has made his share of gaffs too. I want to see you post funny pictures of him too! :D
 
Well, for me, she at least earns points for being a tough lady. It is still very difficult for women to get ahead in politics. I find some of the comments about Sarah to be really terrible, considering, especially for those who espouse feminism as a part of their belief system. It is just rotten, IMO.

Don't agree with her views fine, but you should at least respect the fact that she has gone far as a woman politician. Like it or not that means something.

There are dozens of female politicans who have accomplished more. Both Democrat and Republican

Sure, but Ms. Palin has still accomplished a lot too.
 
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.
 
Well, for me, she at least earns points for being a tough lady. It is still very difficult for women to get ahead in politics. I find some of the comments about Sarah to be really terrible, considering, especially for those who espouse feminism as a part of their belief system. It is just rotten, IMO.

Don't agree with her views fine, but you should at least respect the fact that she has gone far as a woman politician. Like it or not that means something.


liberals hate successful women. liberal women are required to be dependent on the government, pro-abortion, and lesbian. Successful women with families are a threat to the liberal agenda.

I just don't ever remember seeing this level of hatred and disrespect for a person. I've found it interesting from the beginning.


their hate is driven by fear. Palin represents everything that the dems are against. Independent women, successful women, conservative women, family oriented women, smart women, attractive women.

A nation of Palin-like women would destroy the liberal agenda, and the libs know it.


Not destroy it.

Just offer reasonable alternatives.


No, they would destroy it, because it is not right for this country.
 
I read it. Point being, Sarah is also not on the national ticket as a nominee. As I said, she is nothing more than an outspoken private citizen who, for some strange reason, really bothers the liberals. So . . . why the need to ridicule her? Or is that just how you roll whenever you disagree with someone? Perhaps that's the "bully" in you.
Actually, if you keep it under your hat, I'll tell you why Liberals ridicule Sarah Palin. As it turns out, a memo from our Dear Leader, the Muslim, Kenyan-born, Socialist AntiChrist instructed us to aim our blind hatred at Sarah Palin. That's why we're such mean bullies!

Meh, this is not clever at all. It is actually quite predictable. You've got no valid response, so you resort to being ridiculous. :D
Much like Palin and her acolytes.
sarah-palin-foot-in-mouth.jpg

Well, Obama has made his share of gaffs too. I want to see you post funny pictures of him too! :D

Why don't you start an Obama thread and stop deflecting and trying to derail this Palin thread?
 
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.


do you say the same about HRC? or do you think that any attack on her is sexist?
 
Actually, if you keep it under your hat, I'll tell you why Liberals ridicule Sarah Palin. As it turns out, a memo from our Dear Leader, the Muslim, Kenyan-born, Socialist AntiChrist instructed us to aim our blind hatred at Sarah Palin. That's why we're such mean bullies!

Meh, this is not clever at all. It is actually quite predictable. You've got no valid response, so you resort to being ridiculous. :D
Much like Palin and her acolytes.
sarah-palin-foot-in-mouth.jpg

Well, Obama has made his share of gaffs too. I want to see you post funny pictures of him too! :D

Why don't you start an Obama thread and stop deflecting and trying to derail this Palin thread?

Awww. :crybaby:
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.
 
If Palin doesn't want to be treated like a political figure, maybe she should refrain from making public statements about her political aspirations.

But liberals are supposed to be the party that stands for feminist ideals and equal rights for women. Seems rather hypocritical to me. Shouldn't you applaud her for her political aspirations?
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.


the difference is that Palin is using your hatred of her to get very rich. Fluke is too stupid to do that.

bottom line, Palin is smart, Fluke is stupid, and you fools enable both of them
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.
Let's review: Sandra Fluke never testified before any committee. That was a put up job and rubes like you fell for it.
Rush correctly characterized her. But Rush speaks only for Rush and he was one opinion.
Sarah Palin demonstrated she had a better grasp on foreign policy than Obama. She was demonized by the left wing popular media, who fantasized about raping her etc.
And since when is raising money for political speech a bad thing? I thought that was protected by the Constitution.
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.

It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.


the difference is that Palin is using your hatred of her to get very rich. Fluke is too stupid to do that.

bottom line, Palin is smart, Fluke is stupid, and you fools enable both of them
Let me reiterate. We do not hate Sarah Palin! We do not fear Sarah Palin. We pity her and her few acolytes for their willful ignorance.

And I include you in that 'willful ignorance' group. In your post you posited "Palin is smart" despite all evidence to the contrary.
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.
Let's review: Sandra Fluke never testified before any committee. That was a put up job and rubes like you fell for it.
Rush correctly characterized her. But Rush speaks only for Rush and he was one opinion.
Sarah Palin demonstrated she had a better grasp on foreign policy than Obama. She was demonized by the left wing popular media, who fantasized about raping her etc.
And since when is raising money for political speech a bad thing? I thought that was protected by the Constitution.

Revisionist idiot!
 
It's funny how the libs here bellyached about the treatment of Sandra Fluke, and they turn around and do worse to Sarah Palin.
Let's review. Sandra Fluke testifies before a Congressional committee and is then called a slut by a nationally recognized radio host and asshole.

Sarah Palin runs for Vice President of the United States of America and shows her ineptitude on policy for all the world to see. then she doubles down, starts a PAC, opens a web site that puts crosshairs over candidates like Gabby Giffords and raises money for political speech.

Yeah. They're the same.

It doesn't matter if they are the same. It is the hypocrisy of the left.
Gee I wish you had actually read what I posted! The machete of thinking I have to employ to clear the jungle of your partisanship needs constant sharpening.
 
Probably they don't do that about the moose.
However, you sure do that with the thought of the rich and powerful.
Get on your knees and bow to them.
:bowdown:


I'd swear the only people paying attention to Palin are the left-nuts on this site. There isnt a day that goes by that one of you morons isnt posting something about her.
Do you beat off to pics of her killing moose?
 

Forum List

Back
Top