Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were 30 convictions in the Reagan administration. How many in Obama's?The jackass violated the FOIA (BROKE THE LAW) 73% of the time.The most corrupt? Name the president with fewer convictions within their administration...
He ILLEGALLY spied on citizens, reporters, the media, & CONGRESS.
He was only the 2nd US President to ever use the IRS as a weapon against the American people.
He by-passed the Judicial process to act as judge ,jury, and executioner for people - to include Americans abroad - executing his own personal drone assassination program.
He owned a corrupt 'all-in' DOJ, multiple corrupt / CRIMINAL Attorney Generals, and prevented numerous Cabinet Members and Democrats from being indicted and going to jail.
Hard for anyone to get a conviction when the guy and his party doing all the crimes owns the local sheriff!
It's not important other than to show what a pathological liar Trump is as he claims he won the popular vote despite losing it by 3 million.Which, AGAIN, is about as important as how many times a dog licks its own ass every day.The OP's question may have been already answered, but just in case,
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.
he did. He won 30 out of 50 states. how is that not the majority of votes?Is your head that far up republican butts that you actually believe that BS that dump won pop vote??That you can get a large number of people to believe virtually anything. Heck, look at how many poor deluded people voted for Hillary.What's your point in comparing delusional conspiracy nuts with 38% of Republicans?Irrelevant. There's a bunch of people who think we never went to the moon and others who think holograms projected images of airliners onto the WTC on 9/11. IOW, so what?
...and actually believe Bill's wife won the popular vote!!!!
What a bunch of maroons!!!!
There were 30 convictions in the Reagan administration. How many in Obama's?The jackass violated the FOIA (BROKE THE LAW) 73% of the time.The most corrupt? Name the president with fewer convictions within their administration...
He ILLEGALLY spied on citizens, reporters, the media, & CONGRESS.
He was only the 2nd US President to ever use the IRS as a weapon against the American people.
He by-passed the Judicial process to act as judge ,jury, and executioner for people - to include Americans abroad - executing his own personal drone assassination program.
He owned a corrupt 'all-in' DOJ, multiple corrupt / CRIMINAL Attorney Generals, and prevented numerous Cabinet Members and Democrats from being indicted and going to jail.
Hard for anyone to get a conviction when the guy and his party doing all the crimes owns the local sheriff!
Presidents aren't elected by a majority of states either.he did. He won 30 out of 50 states. how is that not the majority of votes?Is your head that far up republican butts that you actually believe that BS that dump won pop vote??That you can get a large number of people to believe virtually anything. Heck, look at how many poor deluded people voted for Hillary.What's your point in comparing delusional conspiracy nuts with 38% of Republicans?
...and actually believe Bill's wife won the popular vote!!!!
What a bunch of maroons!!!!
dude, you really are a lousy reader. LOL. what a waste of skin.he did. He won 30 out of 50 states. how is that not the majority of votes?Is your head that far up republican butts that you actually believe that BS that dump won pop vote??That you can get a large number of people to believe virtually anything. Heck, look at how many poor deluded people voted for Hillary.What's your point in comparing delusional conspiracy nuts with 38% of Republicans?
...and actually believe Bill's wife won the popular vote!!!!
What a bunch of maroons!!!!
These nuts want each state to have 1 vote. How funny is that?
PoliticalChic, post: 16122899We won't let them forget how they lost every metric....even with the lying President telling illegal aliens to go and vote.
You have not shown one fact or quote or full statement by Obama where he told or suggested or inferred that illegals could vote.
Now you have fellow liars that sink to what amounts to a racist attack telling us that Obama reassured illegal voters that they could vote without repercussion.
easyt65, post: 16122844When asked ... It is obviously clear to everyone - even Liberals in denial - that Barry was re-assuring illegals there would be no repercussions if they were caught illegally voting.
This is how the right wing fake news propaganda machine works. It edits the president's very own words which are clear to mean the exact opposite of what was said.
Then it is repeat repeat repeat ad infinitum.
The exponential success of this right wing fake news machine must be due in part to a high degree of racial bias and prejudice of having a black man elected to the highest office in the land. Many right wingers throw their morality out the window by easily accepting fake news and having a thirst for it as HADIT, CHIC, and EASY and Stuart Varney and Neal Cavuto do.
Still no response to this:
PoliticalChic, post: 16117526So now you're running from your 'deceptively edited' claim with your tail between you legs????
No I'm not. Here is the deceptively edited FBN News Clip.
Are you denying Varney aired this on his program?
Why no response to this actually deceptively edited clip? By none of you .
This question goes as well to:
hadit, post: 16123239.See, the president had an opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections, that we have laws against them doing so, and that we will prosecute any who do. He did not make that clear, however, instead saying precisely zero about taking action against illegal votes from illegal voters. When questioned (by someone who should know better) about what might happen to her if she voted, he could have (and in my mind should have), made it clear that citizens have nothing to fear when they vote but non-citizens do.
You see HADIT goes for less gusto than CHIC and EASY when it comes to lying about our first black president. There is a bitch about not taking the opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections. HADIT suggests the President did not say something where CHIC and EASY put false words in the President's mouth. But HADIT by this dimwitted and preposterous demand feeds the fake news machine and repeat repeat repeat until it becomes true to all the deplorables on the right.
What is clear, in the fake Varney clip above, is that Stuart Varney under Cavuto's watch and three days after the actual Obama/Rodreguez interview aired, stated CLEARLY that Rodreguez implied that she was illegal and Obama told an illegal directly that she had nothing to fear by voting illegally.
HADIT demands the black President must say something that goes without saying or be damned, but had no demand that a right wing economist on a nationally seen TV broadcast be clear at all when he edits the words of the president and flat out lies about Gina's citizenship to make a fake news story get a rise out of the deplorables.
Varney and Cavuto are white. They are excused for purposely being unclear to the point of falsehood. Obama is damned by HADIT because he supposedly left something out - which Obama actually did not do as Faun has pointed out by mentioning the website where it's clear that you must be a citizen to vote.
He "mentioned a website". Excuse me while I faint from the excitement.
The website he promoted informs readers they must be U.S. citizens to vote. How is that encouraging illegal aliens to vote?
Perhaps you should consider the sad reality that you're just an idiot, not that NYcarbineer is a lousy reader.dude, you really are a lousy reader. LOL. what a waste of skin.he did. He won 30 out of 50 states. how is that not the majority of votes?Is your head that far up republican butts that you actually believe that BS that dump won pop vote??That you can get a large number of people to believe virtually anything. Heck, look at how many poor deluded people voted for Hillary.
...and actually believe Bill's wife won the popular vote!!!!
What a bunch of maroons!!!!
These nuts want each state to have 1 vote. How funny is that?
PoliticalChic, post: 16122899We won't let them forget how they lost every metric....even with the lying President telling illegal aliens to go and vote.
You have not shown one fact or quote or full statement by Obama where he told or suggested or inferred that illegals could vote.
Now you have fellow liars that sink to what amounts to a racist attack telling us that Obama reassured illegal voters that they could vote without repercussion.
easyt65, post: 16122844When asked ... It is obviously clear to everyone - even Liberals in denial - that Barry was re-assuring illegals there would be no repercussions if they were caught illegally voting.
This is how the right wing fake news propaganda machine works. It edits the president's very own words which are clear to mean the exact opposite of what was said.
Then it is repeat repeat repeat ad infinitum.
The exponential success of this right wing fake news machine must be due in part to a high degree of racial bias and prejudice of having a black man elected to the highest office in the land. Many right wingers throw their morality out the window by easily accepting fake news and having a thirst for it as HADIT, CHIC, and EASY and Stuart Varney and Neal Cavuto do.
Still no response to this:
PoliticalChic, post: 16117526So now you're running from your 'deceptively edited' claim with your tail between you legs????
No I'm not. Here is the deceptively edited FBN News Clip.
Are you denying Varney aired this on his program?
Why no response to this actually deceptively edited clip? By none of you .
This question goes as well to:
hadit, post: 16123239.See, the president had an opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections, that we have laws against them doing so, and that we will prosecute any who do. He did not make that clear, however, instead saying precisely zero about taking action against illegal votes from illegal voters. When questioned (by someone who should know better) about what might happen to her if she voted, he could have (and in my mind should have), made it clear that citizens have nothing to fear when they vote but non-citizens do.
You see HADIT goes for less gusto than CHIC and EASY when it comes to lying about our first black president. There is a bitch about not taking the opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections. HADIT suggests the President did not say something where CHIC and EASY put false words in the President's mouth. But HADIT by this dimwitted and preposterous demand feeds the fake news machine and repeat repeat repeat until it becomes true to all the deplorables on the right.
What is clear, in the fake Varney clip above, is that Stuart Varney under Cavuto's watch and three days after the actual Obama/Rodreguez interview aired, stated CLEARLY that Rodreguez implied that she was illegal and Obama told an illegal directly that she had nothing to fear by voting illegally.
HADIT demands the black President must say something that goes without saying or be damned, but had no demand that a right wing economist on a nationally seen TV broadcast be clear at all when he edits the words of the president and flat out lies about Gina's citizenship to make a fake news story get a rise out of the deplorables.
Varney and Cavuto are white. They are excused for purposely being unclear to the point of falsehood. Obama is damned by HADIT because he supposedly left something out - which Obama actually did not do as Faun has pointed out by mentioning the website where it's clear that you must be a citizen to vote.
He "mentioned a website". Excuse me while I faint from the excitement.
The website he promoted informs readers they must be U.S. citizens to vote. How is that encouraging illegal aliens to vote?
We're arguing in circles. "He mentioned a website" is NOT a strong or clear way to communicate. If the president really wanted to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT allowed to vote and that they would be prosecuted if they were caught doing so, he would have simply said something along the lines of, "It's you are an illegal alien and you are caught voting in this election, you will be prosecuted". Mentioning a website is a very poor way of communicating that idea, which violates the thought that this president is really good at communicating, and stuff. When you want to communicate an idea, you don't mention a website that contains that idea, you clearly state the idea, then you can mention the site if people want further information.
No, that's not the bottom line. That's a byline. The discussion is about whether or not Obama encouraged illegal aliens to vote.The bottom line is that Obama was not really interested in making the point that illegal aliens would face prosecution if they were caught voting. He bent over backward assuring them that they should have a voice in our election.
PoliticalChic, post: 16122899We won't let them forget how they lost every metric....even with the lying President telling illegal aliens to go and vote.
You have not shown one fact or quote or full statement by Obama where he told or suggested or inferred that illegals could vote.
Now you have fellow liars that sink to what amounts to a racist attack telling us that Obama reassured illegal voters that they could vote without repercussion.
easyt65, post: 16122844When asked ... It is obviously clear to everyone - even Liberals in denial - that Barry was re-assuring illegals there would be no repercussions if they were caught illegally voting.
This is how the right wing fake news propaganda machine works. It edits the president's very own words which are clear to mean the exact opposite of what was said.
Then it is repeat repeat repeat ad infinitum.
The exponential success of this right wing fake news machine must be due in part to a high degree of racial bias and prejudice of having a black man elected to the highest office in the land. Many right wingers throw their morality out the window by easily accepting fake news and having a thirst for it as HADIT, CHIC, and EASY and Stuart Varney and Neal Cavuto do.
Still no response to this:
PoliticalChic, post: 16117526 No I'm not. Here is the deceptively edited FBN News Clip.
Are you denying Varney aired this on his program?
Why no response to this actually deceptively edited clip? By none of you .
This question goes as well to:
hadit, post: 16123239.See, the president had an opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections, that we have laws against them doing so, and that we will prosecute any who do. He did not make that clear, however, instead saying precisely zero about taking action against illegal votes from illegal voters. When questioned (by someone who should know better) about what might happen to her if she voted, he could have (and in my mind should have), made it clear that citizens have nothing to fear when they vote but non-citizens do.
You see HADIT goes for less gusto than CHIC and EASY when it comes to lying about our first black president. There is a bitch about not taking the opportunity to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT supposed to vote in our elections. HADIT suggests the President did not say something where CHIC and EASY put false words in the President's mouth. But HADIT by this dimwitted and preposterous demand feeds the fake news machine and repeat repeat repeat until it becomes true to all the deplorables on the right.
What is clear, in the fake Varney clip above, is that Stuart Varney under Cavuto's watch and three days after the actual Obama/Rodreguez interview aired, stated CLEARLY that Rodreguez implied that she was illegal and Obama told an illegal directly that she had nothing to fear by voting illegally.
HADIT demands the black President must say something that goes without saying or be damned, but had no demand that a right wing economist on a nationally seen TV broadcast be clear at all when he edits the words of the president and flat out lies about Gina's citizenship to make a fake news story get a rise out of the deplorables.
Varney and Cavuto are white. They are excused for purposely being unclear to the point of falsehood. Obama is damned by HADIT because he supposedly left something out - which Obama actually did not do as Faun has pointed out by mentioning the website where it's clear that you must be a citizen to vote.
He "mentioned a website". Excuse me while I faint from the excitement.
The website he promoted informs readers they must be U.S. citizens to vote. How is that encouraging illegal aliens to vote?
We're arguing in circles. "He mentioned a website" is NOT a strong or clear way to communicate. If the president really wanted to make it clear that illegal aliens are NOT allowed to vote and that they would be prosecuted if they were caught doing so, he would have simply said something along the lines of, "It's you are an illegal alien and you are caught voting in this election, you will be prosecuted". Mentioning a website is a very poor way of communicating that idea, which violates the thought that this president is really good at communicating, and stuff. When you want to communicate an idea, you don't mention a website that contains that idea, you clearly state the idea, then you can mention the site if people want further information.
LOLOL
He clearly stated they cannot legally vote. That he didn't redundantly state they could face prosecution is merely partisan nitpicking.
That in itself is sufficient to squash any bizarre notion that he encouraged illegals to vote.
No, that's not the bottom line. That's a byline. The discussion is about whether or not Obama encouraged illegal aliens to vote.The bottom line is that Obama was not really interested in making the point that illegal aliens would face prosecution if they were caught voting. He bent over backward assuring them that they should have a voice in our election.
How is telling them they can't vote encouraging them to vote?
@3:25 she actually says "Many of the millennials, dreamers, UNDOCUMENTED citizens....and I call them citizens because they contribute to the country....are fearful of voting.
PoliticalChic, post: 16153845h@3:25 she actually says "Many of the millennials, dreamers, UNDOCUMENTED citizens....and I call them citizens because they contribute to the country....are fearful of voting.
Of course undocumented parents and relatives are fearful of their millenials voting. Republican voter intimidation gets to them. But they fear family members voting not that they have any intention in voting themselves.
You just can't comprehend basic simple English.
When I was in college, for my final in an Advanced Math, my professor apologized for us not being taught everything we were supposed to learn, everything that was supposed to be on the final exam - because our math teacher could not speak English very well.
As a result of this, he said, the exam that had been prepared for us had been modified. It came right out of our books - from the examples in the back...which showed the answers.
He said we could arrange our chairs in any way we would like so we would 'feel comfortable', told us 'NOT' to open our books to pages 312 - 315 when he left, then told us he was going to go for coffee and would be back in an hour.
Oh yeah, he told us NOT to open our books, specifically told us NOT to turn to those pages where the examples and answer were from which the entire final exam had been taken before leaving the room.
All the idiots reading this who thinks he meant it and was NOT encouraging us to cheat please raise your hands.....
Yeah, I thought so.
Hillary still won the popular vote.
Sweet.....Hillary still won the popular vote.
Of bigger concern should be why a citizen would fear INS prosecution in the first place. I blame government schools for the shocking ignorance.
no, no she didn't. Trump won the popular vote by winning 30 states popular votes. That is much more than 20 states. funny you still don't understand it.Hillary still won the popular vote.
