Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, the poster is not making any sense.ROTFLMBAO @ denouncing Storm Front when it suits you.LOL, using Stormfront as a reference when it suits you.
You're both right.
An example of why partisan ideologues on both sides are pretty tough to believe.
.
Exactly, and by your own logic and understanding as to what "StormFront" is, we all know what when and if they state that someone is racist like one of them, then that person is racist like one of them.Where have I EVER used StormFront as a reliable source for anything?
They are the original racist assholes of the internet. Actual racists, not "racists"
Dude, the poster is not making any sense.ROTFLMBAO @ denouncing Storm Front when it suits you.LOL, using Stormfront as a reference when it suits you.
You're both right.
An example of why partisan ideologues on both sides are pretty tough to believe.
.
The source for all things racist IS "Storm Front." I don't see how me referencing that is any way, shape or form hypocritical or unseemly in the least.
Him denouncing it, though, that's another story.
The false equivalency is BS, yet again.
Exactly, and by your own logic and understanding as to what "StormFront" is, we all know what when and if they state that someone is racist like one of them, then that person is racist like one of them.Where have I EVER used StormFront as a reliable source for anything?
They are the original racist assholes of the internet. Actual racists, not "racists"
SNAP OUT OF IT!!!
Google “David Duke without the baggage", you dumbass motherfucker.Gee is there a link here somewhere or do we just take the word of a known liar like Assoholic that another known liar like Rachel Maddow is telling us the truth?
Earnest noted that Scalise had reportedly described himself as “David Duke without the baggage,” and that Republicans had placed a priority on outreach to minority groups.
I see Assoholic has abandoned this thread because there is no proof Scalise ever described himself as a David Duke Republican.
Shouldn't willful lying on this forum be bannable?
So where's the proof Scalise described himself as a "David Duke Republican"?Google “David Duke without the baggage", you dumbass motherfucker.Gee is there a link here somewhere or do we just take the word of a known liar like Assoholic that another known liar like Rachel Maddow is telling us the truth?
Earnest noted that Scalise had reportedly described himself as “David Duke without the baggage,” and that Republicans had placed a priority on outreach to minority groups.
You can quote Rabbi directly just by saying 'google is you
I see Assoholic has abandoned this thread because there is no proof Scalise ever described himself as a David Duke Republican.
Shouldn't willful lying on this forum be bannable?
You'd be long gone then.
It doesn't exists, because he KNOWS he said it.Hopefully somebody will provide a link when Congressman Scalise denies making the comment about being a David Duke Republican. That will clear the entire controversy up.
Then where's the documentation?It doesn't exists, because he KNOWS he said it.Hopefully somebody will provide a link when Congressman Scalise denies making the comment about being a David Duke Republican. That will clear the entire controversy up.
Sleaze Scalise is TOAST!!
As in laugh so hard they cry?I was referring to Matthew, but if you want to join him in the Nutz shit list...just say so...I haven't made a liberal cry in a while.Where?You misspelled 'Ferguson,'
At least I didn't spell it with a comma at the end - that's definitely wrong!
I don't think so. Republicans know there won't be any consequences. They publicly call Obama Tar baby and boy. They say the Obama's are "uppity". Then they win both houses. They truly believe that's what America wants.It doesn't exists, because he KNOWS he said it.Hopefully somebody will provide a link when Congressman Scalise denies making the comment about being a David Duke Republican. That will clear the entire controversy up.
Sleaze Scalise is TOAST!!
So, do you have something besides heresay from liberal hacks? I mean, something like a video or an audio, or an admission from Scalise? Yeah, I didn't think so.White House Scalise as No. 3 Says a Lot About Who GOP Is - ABC News
The White House on Monday waded into a controversy over revelations that the House's No. 3 Republican spoke to a white supremacist group 12 years ago, saying who the GOP has in leadership "says a lot about who they are."
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest repeatedly said Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise once described himself as "David Duke without the baggage." A reporter for the New Orleans Advocate newspaper said Scalise made the remark to her as he was starting out in the Louisiana Legislature nearly 20 years ago. Scalise's office did not immediately respond to calls for comment.
Earnest said it's up to Republicans to decide whether he retains his position. "There is no arguing that who Republicans decide to elevate into a leadership position says a lot about what the conference's priorities and values are," Earnest said.
"We've also heard a lot from Republicans particularly over the last few years, including the chairman of the Republican Party, about how Republicans need to broaden their appeal to young people and to women, to gays and to minorities, that the success of their party will depend on their ability to broaden that outreach," Earnest said. "So it ultimately will be up to individual Republicans in Congress to decide whether or not elevating Mr. Scalise into leadership will effectively reinforce that strategy."
The Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee also issued statements Monday attacking Scalise as Democrats sought to fan the controversy a day before Republicans formally assumed control of Congress. "As the new Congress begins, nothing discredits Republican claims of outreach and bringing people together more than their decision to keep Steve Scalise at the top tier of the elected leadership of their caucus," said DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
<more>
Holy shit - Rachel Maddow has uncovered interviews from the late 1990s and early 2000s, where Scalise declares that he's a "David Duke Republican" and that he's "David Duke, without the baggage".
So let's guess how long before he is forced to resign as Majority Whip, or even resigns from Congress.
I say 2 weeks for the first. Not sure what the Republican tolerance for racists is these days, so he may survive as a Member.
I will post the video tomorrow, but you will all be familiar with it by then.
OK so we've got someone who may or may not even exist recalling a 12 year old memory of something that no one else can remember and there is no record of.So, do you have something besides heresay from liberal hacks? I mean, something like a video or an audio, or an admission from Scalise? Yeah, I didn't think so.White House Scalise as No. 3 Says a Lot About Who GOP Is - ABC News
The White House on Monday waded into a controversy over revelations that the House's No. 3 Republican spoke to a white supremacist group 12 years ago, saying who the GOP has in leadership "says a lot about who they are."
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest repeatedly said Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise once described himself as "David Duke without the baggage." A reporter for the New Orleans Advocate newspaper said Scalise made the remark to her as he was starting out in the Louisiana Legislature nearly 20 years ago. Scalise's office did not immediately respond to calls for comment.
Earnest said it's up to Republicans to decide whether he retains his position. "There is no arguing that who Republicans decide to elevate into a leadership position says a lot about what the conference's priorities and values are," Earnest said.
"We've also heard a lot from Republicans particularly over the last few years, including the chairman of the Republican Party, about how Republicans need to broaden their appeal to young people and to women, to gays and to minorities, that the success of their party will depend on their ability to broaden that outreach," Earnest said. "So it ultimately will be up to individual Republicans in Congress to decide whether or not elevating Mr. Scalise into leadership will effectively reinforce that strategy."
The Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee also issued statements Monday attacking Scalise as Democrats sought to fan the controversy a day before Republicans formally assumed control of Congress. "As the new Congress begins, nothing discredits Republican claims of outreach and bringing people together more than their decision to keep Steve Scalise at the top tier of the elected leadership of their caucus," said DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
<more>
Here's the person who said he told her that he was david duke without the baggage. If you bother to read that whole article you would see that the person who wrote it was defending scalise.
Stephanie Grace: Scalise’s pitch to Duke supporters seems plausible | State | The New Orleans Advocate — New Orleans, Louisiana
I tried to find some information about Stephanie Grace but It's not easy since there's more than one person with that name.
So you can stamp your feet and throw all the temper tantrums you want, it's not going to change honest facts.
Oh don't forget to hold your breath in your attempt to force everyone to believe lies.
This is what I remember about the first time I met Steve Scalise nearly 20 years ago: He told me he was like David Duke without the baggage.
I was a new reporter covering Jefferson Parish, and Scalise, now the majority whip in the U.S. House of Representatives, was just starting out in the Louisiana Legislature (I’m going from memory, but the exchange obviously stuck with me).
Another potential candidate, state Rep. Steve Scalise (R), said he embraces many of the same “conservative” views as Duke, but is far more viable.
“The novelty of David Duke has worn off,” said Scalise. “The voters in this district are smart enough to realize that they need to get behind someone who not only believes in the issues they care about, but also can get elected. Duke has proven that he can’t get elected, and that’s the first and most important thing.”
