XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,692
- 10,522
Which law is going to stop that incident?Those laws are already in place. Enforce them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which law is going to stop that incident?Those laws are already in place. Enforce them.
Are you in Congress?Is it still the law of the land, yes or no?
Point being the Department of Education could be considered unconstitutional since the Constitution doesn't say its a Federal responsibility.
Tell about law breakers and how they care about the law.Which law is going to stop that incident?
Let's work this the other way. What proposed law do you believe would have stopped this incident?Which law is going to stop that incident?
I never expressed any desire to harm anyone. It's him who threaten to shoot people and like this latest school shooter I think it only makes sense to take guns away from people who make violent threats. That isn't unreasonable is it?So, you want him disarmed because you want to harm him.
YepDemocrats don't want schools safer. They want stacks of small bodies to justify their power grab.
Either he would regret itSo, you want him disarmed because you want to harm him.
Either he would regret it
He didn't threaten anyone. He stated his resolve to defend himself and his family.I never expressed any desire to harm anyone. It's him who threaten to shoot people and like this latest school shooter I think it only makes sense to take guns away from people who make violent threats. That isn't unreasonable is it?
Listen up you dumbass ass son of a bitch I was threaten. And I gave my reaction to what would happen if that threat was ever attempted.I never expressed any desire to harm anyone. It's him who threaten to shoot people and like this latest school shooter I think it only makes sense to take guns away from people who make violent threats. That isn't unreasonable is it?
There should be a test about the Constitution before you vote.
There should be a literacy test for gun owners as well.
Defend his family from what?He didn't threaten anyone. He stated his resolve to defend himself and his family.
If you see that as a threat, then yes, you intend to harm people.
In a fight who gives a shit about grammar?
There should be a literacy test for gun owners as well.
After entrapment clowns kept pushing goatI never expressed any desire to harm anyone. It's him who threaten to shoot people and like this latest school shooter I think it only makes sense to take guns away from people who make violent threats. That isn't unreasonable is it?
That would eliminate most white wingers.There should be a test about the Constitution before you vote.
The threat to come and take my property.Defend his family from what?
From the fucking Easter Bunny. Hes got big teeth.Defend his family from what?
What was being discussed was changing the law to take your guns, not thievery.The threat to come and take my property.
You're full of shit.That would eliminate most white wingers.
In this case, I believe it was removing his means of defending himself and his family by unconstitutional means.Defend his family from what?