Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
- 910
They are going to have their very own white kid meeting.
Actually that isn't a 'fact' but a 'hope' stated by the principal after public reaction.
...Though the affinity groups began with black students, Rouse said he hopes to have similar groups in the near future for white, Latino and Asian students. And once the students have had their say in the individual groups, he hopes to culminate the effort with a school-wide event that lets all students talk about race together.
OPRF parents upset apos Black Lives Matter apos assembly excludes other races - Oak Leaves
You're assuming it is simply after public reaction.
No, I am not. Reaction was 'after the fact' as the article made clear. Perhaps more problematic is found on the OPRFHS site itself. The 'news' is dated the 3rd, though 'reaction' is made clear in last paragraph.
As a secondary educator I don't have a problem with 'targeted' assemblies per se, though school administrations generally do, as it creates problems for anyone excluded.
This is the first time I've seen 'affinity grouping' being a rationale in a publicly funded school setting or any school. I did try to find out if some new methodologies were introduced in the past few years, but find the applications were in business and one in college setting.
I'm not buying that you're a secondary educator. At all. Unless, I was standing next to the guy from the get go then I cannot state either way. Neither can you.
That's the article from the site:
Principal Rouse hosts Black Lives Matter discussion
Here is the strategic plan:
http://www.oprfhs.org/documents/2StrategicPlan_BOE_012314_FINAL.pdf
This was the focus last year at a widely publicized event:
http://www.summitforcourageousconversation.com/pdfs/SummitProgram.pdf
Affinity groups at Waterloo Schools
Student Affinity Groups
Here is one for Cambodian-American students:
http://www.arps.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=1129253
I don't care what you believe. Good for you for finding the article I pointed you to. Also credit you for finding at least some references to 'affinity groups' in education. From the seminar materials you posted, seems the 'affinity groups' though were breakout sessions, followed by whole group discussions, which makes sense.
However rather than being the 'focus' of the seminar, they were one of the many options available to participants.
That's good reading. The focus of the seminar was not "affinity groups". Can you tell me what the focus was? It is, after all, a seminar for educators.