Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[M14 Shooter]

House Judiciary Says Trump Committed ‘Multiple Federal Crimes’ In Report On Impeachment
House Judiciary Says Trump Committed 'Multiple Federal Crimes' In Report On Impeachment

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

You are erroneously conflating the Repubs inevitable acquittal of Trump with whether he is guilty. The two have nothing to do with one another.

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

 

[Siete]

House Judiciary Says Trump Committed ‘Multiple Federal Crimes’ In Report On Impeachment
House Judiciary Says Trump Committed 'Multiple Federal Crimes' In Report On Impeachment

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

dont work like that Gomer -

So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

the senate acquited Bill Clinton, so youre telling me you believe he was innocent ...

good to know -

 

[Faun]

House Judiciary Says Trump Committed ‘Multiple Federal Crimes’ In Report On Impeachment
House Judiciary Says Trump Committed 'Multiple Federal Crimes' In Report On Impeachment

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

dont work like that Gomer -

So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

The Senate acquitted Clinton in 1998. Yet here we are, nearly 22 years later and YOU still believe he committed those "supposed crimes."

Clinton committed perjury and obstruction of justice - federal felonies.

 

[berg80]

House Judiciary Says Trump Committed ‘Multiple Federal Crimes’ In Report On Impeachment
House Judiciary Says Trump Committed 'Multiple Federal Crimes' In Report On Impeachment

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

You are erroneously conflating the Repubs inevitable acquittal of Trump with whether he is guilty. The two have nothing to do with one another.

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence? I mean, Mitch McTreason and Lindsey have already made it clear they have no interest in, nor do they want to discuss, the factual case established by the House. Neither do they want to insist the witnesses Trump is blocking from testifying be heard from. They just want to acquit and move on..............leaving a trampled Constitution in their wake.

 

[berg80]

House Judiciary Says Trump Committed ‘Multiple Federal Crimes’ In Report On Impeachment
House Judiciary Says Trump Committed 'Multiple Federal Crimes' In Report On Impeachment

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

dont work like that Gomer -

So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

the senate acquited Bill Clinton, so youre telling me you believe he was innocent ...

good to know -

Innocent of perjury? Absolutely not.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Well THAT settles it.


When the Senate acquits Trump, will you accept the fact that he did NOT commit the crimes the House Dems accused him of?

You are erroneously conflating the Repubs inevitable acquittal of Trump with whether he is guilty. The two have nothing to do with one another.

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

 

[easyt65]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...LvmAhWnZd8KHVruDLkQMwhHKBAwEA&iact=mrc&uact=8


Bwuhahahahahaha......




.

 

[berg80]

You are erroneously conflating the Repubs inevitable acquittal of Trump with whether he is guilty. The two have nothing to do with one another.

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts. Trump did what he is accused of doing. All the evidence proves it. You folks...................have nothing to dispute that.

 

[kyzr]

Who gives a fuck what Schumer says?

 

[The Original Tree]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Fuck them. That is a Saul Alinsky Tactic. Break every Rule and then ask your Opposition to Follow Every Rule.

I say we have a Pre-Dawn Raid at Adolph Schiffler's and Herr Schummer's house and tell Fox News to be there to film it.

They are both pedophiles and homosexuals, and so is Nadler, so you know there is tons of evidence and pornography laying around to nail them on and send them to jail for the rest of their lives.

 

[edthecynic]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

 

[M14 Shooter]

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Schumer

 

[berg80]

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts. Trump did what he is accused of doing. All the evidence proves it. You folks...................have nothing to dispute that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.

 

[Nostra]

Wants the Senate trial to be limited to only what the House presented. He says that’s only fair. He’s an idiot.



it was just on TV. I will add link as soon as it becomes available.

Actually the idea is to put up a link WHEN it becomes available. Before that it's just hot air connected to nothing. The void.

What's the point here anyway? Why WOULDN'T* such a trial be limited to what's presented? Where have you ever seen a trial that ventures off into shit not presented?

(* And no "would" still does not mean "wouldn't".)

The Reps are running this trial. They should not allow any hearsay, just like a regular trial.

Dims would have no case.

 

[berg80]

The key to understanding the disingenuous nature of the OP is House Repubs wanted to turn the inquiry in to Kabuki theater by introducing witnesses irrelevant to the matter at hand, Trump's extortion of Ukraine. Schumer wants the opposite. He wants witness testimony from people like Bolton, Mulvaney, Perry, Pompeo, Giuliani who can add substantive testimony for the record.
See the difference?

 

[Nostra]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

Correct, the house was a Nazi farce.

 

[Nostra]

The key to understanding the disingenuous nature of the OP is House Repubs wanted to turn the inquiry in to Kabuki theater by introducing witnesses irrelevant to the matter at hand, Trump's extortion of Ukraine. Schumer wants the opposite. He wants witness testimony from people like Bolton, Mulvaney, Perry, Pompeo, Giuliani who can add substantive testimony for the record.
See the difference?

Dimwingers can sit down and shut the fuck up in the Senate. You don't run the show over there.

Schumer can fuck off.

 

[Siete]

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts

Thank you for further supporting my point.

you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.