Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

:21: :21: :21:
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
:21: :21: :21:
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
 
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

so remind everyone that Clinton is innocent because the senate acquitted him -
 
Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
so remind everyone that Clinton is innocent because the senate acquitted him -
I accept your concession of the point.
 
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
so remind everyone that Clinton is innocent because the senate acquitted him -
I accept your concession of the point.

translation ^^^^^^

I'm a f'n idiot wiith a liplock on trumps fat ass.
 
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
Were you held back in elementary school? If not, maybe you should have been. Cuz you can't comprehend simple concepts. Enjoy the rest of your day in Trumpworld.
 
Thank you for further supporting my point.
Please - continue at your leisure.
What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts
Thank you for further supporting my point.
you've proven your hypocrisy, you dont have a point.
Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT
Were you held back in elementary school? If not, maybe you should have been. Cuz you can't comprehend simple concepts. Enjoy the rest of your day in Trumpworld.
Thank you for further supporting my point
 
Schumer proposes that Bolton, Mulvaney testify in Senate impeachment trial

"WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer proposed calling former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney as witnesses at an impeachment trial for President Donald Trump in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Sunday.

"The offer is intended as a signal that Democrats are seeking an evidentiary trial, not intending to simply rely on the House investigation."

How likely is it Trump will find it impossible to resist the spotlight and testify in his own defense?
 
They damn well know what witnesses that directly worked with Trump on holding up aid to Ukraine have to say, so they don't want their sworn testimony.

But thats alright, Republicans will get bashed over the head for this shameless cover-up for Trump all the way through elections.
 
The Republicans haven't DONE anything yet!!

You should be ashamed of your Democrats who didn't 'hold' a lawful impeachment query.
They’ve drug their heels rather than participate and find the truth. The impeachment inquiry has been perfectly lawful.

Yes, the House Dems have dug their heels in.

Since November 2016 - when Pelosi and Maxine began screeching "Impeach, Impeach!"

Dumb Dems can't even impeach properly.

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

And 'they' still haven't found squat on Trump.
Even after three years of trying.


lmao

Several of trump's 'associates' in prison and one awaiting sentencing. That should tell you something.

It tells me that there are some very crooked people in Washington and it's hard to find good help that has a clean past. Was there someone convicted of something that had to do with the trump election campaign? Hmmmm.....

Let me check.
 
The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.
LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!
 
They’ve drug their heels rather than participate and find the truth. The impeachment inquiry has been perfectly lawful.

Yes, the House Dems have dug their heels in.

Since November 2016 - when Pelosi and Maxine began screeching "Impeach, Impeach!"

Dumb Dems can't even impeach properly.

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

And 'they' still haven't found squat on Trump.
Even after three years of trying.


lmao

Several of trump's 'associates' in prison and one awaiting sentencing. That should tell you something.

It tells me that there are some very crooked people in Washington and it's hard to find good help that has a clean past. Was there someone convicted of something that had to do with the trump election campaign? Hmmmm.....

Let me check.
I don’t think Trump is interested in finding good clean people.

Being a scumbag is a feature, not a bug for him.
 
Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.
 
President's asking for investigations into their political opponents is a-okay with you?
Why do you believe than someone running against an incumbent White House is immune to federal investigation of actions he took while he was a elected federal official?
Where did I say that?
Oh, so you agree - the federal government CAN investigate Joe Biden for actions he took while an elected federal official, even though he is running for office.
And yet, you think Trump should be impeached for instigating that very thing.
:21:
Of course the government can investigate Joe Biden. They aren't, because the allegations are bullshit.

Let me ask you a very basic question. Does Trump have a conflict of interest when it comes to investigations into the Bidens? Does he harbor anti-Biden bias?

Do you have evidence they are bullshit? Did someone complete an investigation and I wasn't aware of it?

And I'll answer the second one - No there is no conflict of interest. Trump is the nations top cop. He runs the executive branch which puts people in jail for breaking the law.

Is he biased? I sure hope so. Biden is one corrupt fucking guy IMO.
 
President's asking for investigations into their political opponents is a-okay with you?
Why do you believe than someone running against an incumbent White House is immune to federal investigation of actions he took while he was a elected federal official?
Where did I say that?
Oh, so you agree - the federal government CAN investigate Joe Biden for actions he took while an elected federal official, even though he is running for office.
And yet, you think Trump should be impeached for instigating that very thing.
:21:
Of course the government can investigate Joe Biden. They aren't, because the allegations are bullshit.

Let me ask you a very basic question. Does Trump have a conflict of interest when it comes to investigations into the Bidens? Does he harbor anti-Biden bias?

Do you have evidence they are bullshit? Did someone complete an investigation and I wasn't aware of it?

And I'll answer the second one - No there is no conflict of interest. Trump is the nations top cop. He runs the executive branch which puts people in jail for breaking the law.

Is he biased? I sure hope so. Biden is one corrupt fucking guy IMO.

take a wild guess who aint getting impeached -

go check.
 
They damn well know what witnesses that directly worked with Trump on holding up aid to Ukraine have to say, so they don't want their sworn testimony.

But thats alright, Republicans will get bashed over the head for this shameless cover-up for Trump all the way through elections.

Hate to tell you but if the economy is strong by November next year you can just kiss your wish of a Warren Presidency away and enjoy four mor years of Trump...

No one except those like you will still be fixated on the Ukraine like the right was on Benghazi...
 
LevelsofHonk.jpg
 
And I'll answer the second one - No there is no conflict of interest. Trump is the nations top cop. He runs the executive branch which puts people in jail for breaking the law.
Absolutely true.
The "investigating a political opponent" line currently used by the left is nothing but desperate spin, as they all agree a political opponent of an incumbent white house is not immune from investigation.
 
Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.
The whistlegossip.

That's one....Now GTFO.
 

Forum List

Back
Top