Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"Of course it's a threat to our national security. That's why it's illegal. Do you think foreign countries have our best interest in mind or their own?It doesn't matter. Under no circumstance can Trump break the law by soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival. Even if Trump suspected Biden committed a crime, he should have had his own Justice Department investigate Biden, not a foreign national. It involved a political rival. It's illegal and a threat to national security to delegate that job to a foreign nation.You only see biden as a political candidate rather than a former VP who abused his officeHow is a president soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival not violating that law?
Threat to national security? Really, Faun? You folks keep trotting that out like it's going to give your pathetic impeachment some gravitas and all it does is make me laugh at you! An investigation into apparent corruption between the Biden family and numerous foreign entities isn't going to bring down America any more than an investigation into Trump did! It sure as hell isn't a threat to national security...what it is...is a threat to Joe Biden because it looks like his family cashed in on his position as Vice President in a huge way!
As for what Trump should have done? We don't have jurisdiction to investigate crimes in other countries on a whim...we have to ask them to allow us to do so. Trump asking the President of the Ukraine to look into possible Quid Pro Quo between Biden and Burismo and into whether anyone in the Ukraine interfered in our election is EXACTLY as it should have been handled. The Ukraine is a sovereign nation. They're not our lap dog! (Although you'd be hard pressed to believe that from the way that the Obama Administration treated them! Six hours to fire someone or we're cutting off a billion in foreign aid?) Who was the REAL threat to national security...
How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security? That's laughable! Hunter Biden not being able to cash in on his family name somehow weakens the US? Really?
The Ukraine has the interests of the Ukraine in mind...as well they should! IT'S THEIR COUNTRY!!! We don't have any more right to fly the FBI into the Ukraine and start questioning people then we do to have the IRS start doing audits on Ukrainian citizens!
"How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"
You have a serious mental deformity, lying con tool. Sad really. I never said investigating Biden is a threat to national security.
Don't like to have actual crimes pointed out move on
Clintons crime was last CENTURY
YOU MOVE ON ASSHAT
Get over 2016 when you LOST fair and square. YOU MOVE ON ASSHAT!
WRONG CLINTON U DUMBASS -
You stupid fuckwad. I never mentioned a Clinton. Merely referenced your idiotic MOVE ON statement. Damn you never got out of grade school did you you moron?
lost in 2016 - to who ?
gfy princess
Wants the Senate trial to be limited to only what the House presented. He says that’s only fair. He’s an idiot.
it was just on TV. I will add link as soon as it becomes available.
here is link.
But asking someone to investigate Biden is? You're pathetic, Faun..."How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"Of course it's a threat to our national security. That's why it's illegal. Do you think foreign countries have our best interest in mind or their own?It doesn't matter. Under no circumstance can Trump break the law by soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival. Even if Trump suspected Biden committed a crime, he should have had his own Justice Department investigate Biden, not a foreign national. It involved a political rival. It's illegal and a threat to national security to delegate that job to a foreign nation.You only see biden as a political candidate rather than a former VP who abused his office
Threat to national security? Really, Faun? You folks keep trotting that out like it's going to give your pathetic impeachment some gravitas and all it does is make me laugh at you! An investigation into apparent corruption between the Biden family and numerous foreign entities isn't going to bring down America any more than an investigation into Trump did! It sure as hell isn't a threat to national security...what it is...is a threat to Joe Biden because it looks like his family cashed in on his position as Vice President in a huge way!
As for what Trump should have done? We don't have jurisdiction to investigate crimes in other countries on a whim...we have to ask them to allow us to do so. Trump asking the President of the Ukraine to look into possible Quid Pro Quo between Biden and Burismo and into whether anyone in the Ukraine interfered in our election is EXACTLY as it should have been handled. The Ukraine is a sovereign nation. They're not our lap dog! (Although you'd be hard pressed to believe that from the way that the Obama Administration treated them! Six hours to fire someone or we're cutting off a billion in foreign aid?) Who was the REAL threat to national security...
How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security? That's laughable! Hunter Biden not being able to cash in on his family name somehow weakens the US? Really?
The Ukraine has the interests of the Ukraine in mind...as well they should! IT'S THEIR COUNTRY!!! We don't have any more right to fly the FBI into the Ukraine and start questioning people then we do to have the IRS start doing audits on Ukrainian citizens!
You have a serious mental deformity, lying con tool. Sad really. I never said investigating Biden is a threat to national security.
So let me get this straight...the President who sent the Ukrainian's weapons (Trump) to protect themselves against Russian aggression is the "bad guy" but the President who sent the Ukrainians blankets (Obama) to protect themselves against Russian aggression is the "good guy"?"How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"
You have a serious mental deformity, lying con tool. Sad really. I never said investigating Biden is a threat to national security.
Naw, the goof is just too smart by half. He is trying to ignore the national security implications emerging from withholding, and possibly letting expire (had he not been caught), security assistance to the front line state against Russian aggression. So, it's all about Hunter. It has to be, and that's then attributed to you. Old Style. The dummy probably thinks that's smart.
No, you dumbfuck. Investigating Biden isn't. That's now I've corrected your bullshit, lying con tool.But asking someone to investigate Biden is? You're pathetic, Faun..."How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"Of course it's a threat to our national security. That's why it's illegal. Do you think foreign countries have our best interest in mind or their own?It doesn't matter. Under no circumstance can Trump break the law by soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival. Even if Trump suspected Biden committed a crime, he should have had his own Justice Department investigate Biden, not a foreign national. It involved a political rival. It's illegal and a threat to national security to delegate that job to a foreign nation.
Threat to national security? Really, Faun? You folks keep trotting that out like it's going to give your pathetic impeachment some gravitas and all it does is make me laugh at you! An investigation into apparent corruption between the Biden family and numerous foreign entities isn't going to bring down America any more than an investigation into Trump did! It sure as hell isn't a threat to national security...what it is...is a threat to Joe Biden because it looks like his family cashed in on his position as Vice President in a huge way!
As for what Trump should have done? We don't have jurisdiction to investigate crimes in other countries on a whim...we have to ask them to allow us to do so. Trump asking the President of the Ukraine to look into possible Quid Pro Quo between Biden and Burismo and into whether anyone in the Ukraine interfered in our election is EXACTLY as it should have been handled. The Ukraine is a sovereign nation. They're not our lap dog! (Although you'd be hard pressed to believe that from the way that the Obama Administration treated them! Six hours to fire someone or we're cutting off a billion in foreign aid?) Who was the REAL threat to national security...
How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security? That's laughable! Hunter Biden not being able to cash in on his family name somehow weakens the US? Really?
The Ukraine has the interests of the Ukraine in mind...as well they should! IT'S THEIR COUNTRY!!! We don't have any more right to fly the FBI into the Ukraine and start questioning people then we do to have the IRS start doing audits on Ukrainian citizens!
You have a serious mental deformity, lying con tool. Sad really. I never said investigating Biden is a threat to national security.
He sent them financial aid 7 months after Congress approved it. And even then, only after it became public knowledge that he was holding the money up in exchange for favors. Getting caught was the only reason he released the funds after 7 months and that was just so his gullible trumper humpers would say, see? He released the money.So let me get this straight...the President who sent the Ukrainian's weapons (Trump) to protect themselves against Russian aggression is the "bad guy" but the President who sent the Ukrainians blankets (Obama) to protect themselves against Russian aggression is the "good guy"?"How is shining a light on how Joe Biden's family have been raking in millions from foreign entities somehow a threat to national security?"
You have a serious mental deformity, lying con tool. Sad really. I never said investigating Biden is a threat to national security.
Naw, the goof is just too smart by half. He is trying to ignore the national security implications emerging from withholding, and possibly letting expire (had he not been caught), security assistance to the front line state against Russian aggression. So, it's all about Hunter. It has to be, and that's then attributed to you. Old Style. The dummy probably thinks that's smart.
You're so clueless on this topic it borders on farce!
Dear Moron this has been covered it's not the Senate's job to call new witnesses and do more investigating for the house the investigation is over. Nows it's time for the trial.Moron, it does include witnesses.Yes it is which does not include the jury doing further investigations for the house.Because that's the purpose of a trial. For the Senate to mull over evidence; some of which may not have been presented during the hearing.Because it's supposed to be a trial. Witnesses are generally called in trials.Who says the Senate has to call any witnesses?
It's not a criminal trial, moron. Why would you need to call a witness when his testimony has already been observed?
And as has been pointed out to you already, you're just too dense to comprehend.... the next phase is a trial, not an investigation.
Maybe, maybe not.Nows it's time for the trial.Moron, it does include witnesses.Yes it is which does not include the jury doing further investigations for the house.Because that's the purpose of a trial. For the Senate to mull over evidence; some of which may not have been presented during the hearing.Because it's supposed to be a trial. Witnesses are generally called in trials.
It's not a criminal trial, moron. Why would you need to call a witness when his testimony has already been observed?
And as has been pointed out to you already, you're just too dense to comprehend.... the next phase is a trial, not an investigation.
The investigation is over. The impeachment vote has been cast.now we move to the trial stage and the democrats have nothing for evidence that would compel the Senate to convict. I know it and even more, you know it.Maybe, maybe not.Nows it's time for the trial.Moron, it does include witnesses.Yes it is which does not include the jury doing further investigations for the house.Because that's the purpose of a trial. For the Senate to mull over evidence; some of which may not have been presented during the hearing.It's not a criminal trial, moron. Why would you need to call a witness when his testimony has already been observed?
And as has been pointed out to you already, you're just too dense to comprehend.... the next phase is a trial, not an investigation.
Again... maybe, maybe not. What are you going to do if Pelosi chooses to not let the Senate hold a trial? Pound more sand?The investigation is over. The impeachment vote has been cast.now we move to the trial stage and the democrats have nothing for evidence that would compel the Senate to convict. I know it and even more, you know it.Maybe, maybe not.Nows it's time for the trial.Moron, it does include witnesses.Yes it is which does not include the jury doing further investigations for the house.Because that's the purpose of a trial. For the Senate to mull over evidence; some of which may not have been presented during the hearing.
And as has been pointed out to you already, you're just too dense to comprehend.... the next phase is a trial, not an investigation.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.
Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.
In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.
Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.
