Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

Were Republicans in that closet as well?

No

That's a lie, there was a republican present at every interview. Trump Humpers lie like a rug.

Wrong. They were shut out. Democrats think they own the gov.

That's a lie.

The Closed-Door Impeachment

 

[hadit]

Unfortunately for you voting is the only option you have

But it’s not the only option available to the country.

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

Claiming that a vote to aquit has nothing to do with the rule of law is foolishness to the extreme.

 

[colfax_m]

The House would get their testimony in a few years. The Senate has an obligation to seek the truth. They’re going to help cover for Trump instead.

Remember 2000? Things can be fast tracked in the courts. And the Senate's job is to judge the House's case, not look for ways to get guilty.

Only when both parties agree to fast track it. Do you think Trump will agree to fast track this case?

Why do both parties have to agree? A judge can decide to hear a case if he wants to. He's in control of his court. The SC, which is where it would end up anywhere, is perfectly capable of hearing it quickly. Trump could delay only as long as the judge or justices agree he could.

Because if one side wants to make it a long and painful process, it’s really not that hard. Just file motion after motion after motion. All of which needs responses, considerations and decisions.

They didn't even try.

It took 6 months for a district court decision about McGhan. Trump appealed so it’s still tied up.

So yeah. We know how this is going to go from experience.

 

[colfax_m]

But it’s not the only option available to the country.

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

Claiming that a vote to aquit has nothing to do with the rule of law is foolishness to the extreme.

Republicans have demonstrated that they have little interest in revealing the truth. This isn’t about rule of law. It’s about keeping us in the dark.

 

[The Original Tree]

Before they discovered he submitted false statements.

This is why you don’t rush an impeachment or evidence gathering.

Trump got ram rodded through in 36 days vs Bill Clinton getting 162 Days.

Care to explain that disparity?

Great and glorious day today for Mother Russia, You & Putin, No?

You should be happy. Pelosi is, and she pre-ordered cases of Champagne and so did Putin.

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

How stupid can you be? The entire report was about everything wrong with the FISA warrant. Horowitz outlined how even the guy who was the source for the Steele "dossier" said it was a piece of crap.

WRONG IG idiot!!!!!!
it is the whistle blower IG, not the FISA IG, who found the WHISTLE BLOWER'S report CREDIBLE!

 

[hadit]

Remember 2000? Things can be fast tracked in the courts. And the Senate's job is to judge the House's case, not look for ways to get guilty.

Only when both parties agree to fast track it. Do you think Trump will agree to fast track this case?

Why do both parties have to agree? A judge can decide to hear a case if he wants to. He's in control of his court. The SC, which is where it would end up anywhere, is perfectly capable of hearing it quickly. Trump could delay only as long as the judge or justices agree he could.

Because if one side wants to make it a long and painful process, it’s really not that hard. Just file motion after motion after motion. All of which needs responses, considerations and decisions.

They didn't even try.

It took 6 months for a district court decision about McGhan. Trump appealed so it’s still tied up.

So yeah. We know how this is going to go from experience.

They didn't even try. The bottom line remains, they are fighting the clock because they want to campaign instead of being stuck in Washington 6 days a week during campaign season. It's their choice.

The courts are there for reasons, and settling disputes between the executive and legislative branches is one of them.

 

[hadit]

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

Claiming that a vote to aquit has nothing to do with the rule of law is foolishness to the extreme.

Republicans have demonstrated that they have little interest in revealing the truth. This isn’t about rule of law. It’s about keeping us in the dark.

Democrats failed to produce a strong case. That's on them. If they couldn't do it, they could have just dropped it.

 

[The Original Tree]

Putin Smiles. Good work Comrade. Today is Glorious Day for Mother Russia.

Nice attempt to cherry pick and distort the Weismann-Mueller report that stated NO collusion with the Russians was found ...

That wasn't the conclusion that lifelong Republican fixer Bob Mueller came to: he said he found no proof of collusion between elements of the Russian government and the Trump campaign. Possibly he reached this conclusion because he didn't investigate Trump's financial history with rich FSU gangsters?

"For Donald Trump, there was the purchase of the $12.6 million Scottish estate and the $79.7 million for golf courses in the United Kingdom, not to mention the $16.2 million for the Northern Virginia Winery. All in cash.

"For Michael Cohen, it was the lucrative day in 2014 when he sold four Manhattan buildings for $32 million—three times what he’d paid for them less than three years before."

If Trump Is Laundering Russian Money, Here’s How It Works

 

[hadit]

Before they discovered he submitted false statements.

This is why you don’t rush an impeachment or evidence gathering.

Trump got ram rodded through in 36 days vs Bill Clinton getting 162 Days.

Care to explain that disparity?

Great and glorious day today for Mother Russia, You & Putin, No?

You should be happy. Pelosi is, and she ore-ordered cases of Champagne and so did Putin.

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

How stupid can you be? The entire report was about everything wrong with the FISA warrant. Horowitz outlined how even the guy who was the source for the Steele "dossier" said it was a piece of crap.

WRONG IG idiot!!!!!!
it is the whistle blower IG, not the FISA IG, who found the WHISTLE BLOWER'S report CREDIBLE!

If they were serious about justice and not just a campaign issue, they would do whatever it takes. They're not serious.

 

[bripat9643]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

How stupid can you be? The entire report was about everything wrong with the FISA warrant. Horowitz outlined how even the guy who was the source for the Steele "dossier" said it was a piece of crap.

WRONG IG idiot!!!!!!
it is the whistle blower IG, not the FISA IG, who found the WHISTLE BLOWER'S report CREDIBLE!

Nice attempt to cherry pick and distort the Weismann-Mueller report that stated NO collusion with the Russians was found ...

That wasn't the conclusion that lifelong Republican fixer Bob Mueller came to: he said he found no proof of collusion between elements of the Russian government and the Trump campaign. Possibly he reached this conclusion because he didn't investigate Trump's financial history with rich FSU gangsters?

"For Donald Trump, there was the purchase of the $12.6 million Scottish estate and the $79.7 million for golf courses in the United Kingdom, not to mention the $16.2 million for the Northern Virginia Winery. All in cash.

"For Michael Cohen, it was the lucrative day in 2014 when he sold four Manhattan buildings for $32 million—three times what he’d paid for them less than three years before."

If Trump Is Laundering Russian Money, Here’s How It Works

"For Donald Trump, there was the purchase of the $12.6 million Scottish estate and the $79.7 million for golf courses in the United Kingdom, not to mention the $16.2 million for the Northern Virginia Winery. All in cash.

So what? That's petty cash for Trump.

 

[The Original Tree]

Agree The House was Not serious at all about Due Process, Civil Rights or Truth as they had a predetermine outcome in mind and rigged things to that end.

The trial is over, so time to review The Evidence and just vote.

Before they discovered he submitted false statements.

This is why you don’t rush an impeachment or evidence gathering.

Trump got ram rodded through in 36 days vs Bill Clinton getting 162 Days.

Care to explain that disparity?

Great and glorious day today for Mother Russia, You & Putin, No?

You should be happy. Pelosi is, and she ore-ordered cases of Champagne and so did Putin.

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

How stupid can you be? The entire report was about everything wrong with the FISA warrant. Horowitz outlined how even the guy who was the source for the Steele "dossier" said it was a piece of crap.

WRONG IG idiot!!!!!!
it is the whistle blower IG, not the FISA IG, who found the WHISTLE BLOWER'S report CREDIBLE!

If they were serious about justice and not just a campaign issue, they would do whatever it takes. They're not serious.

 

[Olde Europe]

It took 6 months for a district court decision about McGhan. Trump appealed so it’s still tied up.

So yeah. We know how this is going to go from experience.

It took the Washington Post three and a half years to pry loose the Afghanistan papers. Going to the courts over a so-called president's determined opposition to any inquiry into his corruption would render the Impeachment power null and void.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unfortunately for you voting is the only option you have

But it’s not the only option available to the country.

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

Actually it's the Democrats who have disregarded their loyalty to the country for a Schiff Sham.
Y'all actually present a weak case for impeachment

How are they disregarding their loyalty to country?

The loyalty has always been to the agenda of impeaching the president DAY 1
It was never to the country.
Al Green 2017 I come before Congress with a resultion to impeach the president
Mad Max Waters IMPEACH 45
TALBIT WE'RE GOING TO IMPEACH THE MOTHER FUCKER ALL WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE
It's been the plan all along

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It took 6 months for a district court decision about McGhan. Trump appealed so it’s still tied up.

So yeah. We know how this is going to go from experience.

It took the Washington Post three and a half years to pry loose the Afghanistan papers. Going to the courts over a so-called president's determined opposition to any inquiry into his corruption would render the Impeachment power null and void.

The Schiff Sham rendered the impeachment null and void
This impeachment is like a kid who unwraps his Christmas present and sees it the very gift he wanted until he opens the books and sees it just socks.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Unfortunately for you voting is the only option you have

But it’s not the only option available to the country.

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

No, they aren't

 

[colfax_m]

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

Claiming that a vote to aquit has nothing to do with the rule of law is foolishness to the extreme.

Republicans have demonstrated that they have little interest in revealing the truth. This isn’t about rule of law. It’s about keeping us in the dark.

Democrats failed to produce a strong case. That's on them. If they couldn't do it, they could have just dropped it.

This is the attitude I find troubling. I always thought it was Congress’s job to oversee the president. It turns out that just is the duty of Democrats. Republicans have decided their duty is to protect the president.

And you wonder why this feels partisan?

 

[colfax_m]

But it’s not the only option available to the country.

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

No, they aren't

Then why is McConnell refusing to allow any witnesses?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Question what should be done to those Congressmen who went to the border and help bring in illegals?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your only other option is about to go down in the senate before your eyes

Then you will have no recourse

The Senate is about to place loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country.

More accurately place loyalty to the rule of law above partisan politics.

You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.

No, they aren't

Then why is McConnell refusing to allow any witnesses?

It's not the job of the senate "Jury" to assist in finding more evidence for the democrats. If the democrats had the evidence for impeachment why are you wanting more?

 

[Faun]

Who says the House has to call every witness they wan for the Trial??

Who says the Senate has to call any witnesses?

Because it's supposed to be a trial. Witnesses are generally called in trials.

It's not a criminal trial, moron. Why would you need to call a witness when his testimony has already been observed?

Because that's the purpose of a trial. For the Senate to mull over evidence; some of which may not have been presented during the hearing.

Yes it is which does not include the jury doing further investigations for the house.

Moron, it does include witnesses.

And as has been pointed out to you already, you're just too dense to comprehend.... the next phase is a trial, not an investigation.