Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The correlation of the numbers is off, I think. But say you are correct on the 60% consider themselves "conservative", then it means about only one out of three conservatives consider the GOP a desirable party. BHO demonstrated that the Dems can get those centrist voters. We must do more than be the party of "no".
The Republican Party needs to appeal to the center and moderates and independents. We cannot win with the wingnut reactionaries. We need to meld conservatives with the center, marginalizing the whackos to the left and the right. I think a ticket of Romney and Huckabee in 2012 can do that, as long as we drop the wingnuts and tell Rush to take a hike.
Mebbe so, Zoom-boing, but I have seen far left and far right run away with all sorts of things. Reviewing it, I think Brown handled it OK. He could have been more forceful and said it doesn't matter.
The American people didn't like TARP and a majority of them did not like Palin, _NH. And the polls I have seen indicate they like her far less now. I am glad to see that she has found a steady platform on Fox for her viewpoints.
There are facts, there are attitudes, and your attitude about the facts leads one to conclude you are using the same tactics that you accuse the other side of using. Have I misstated your position?
That is the problem with history. It comes around and bites you in the ass.
Does this affect their qualifications for the job? Does this mean that Cokesley has suddenly got a clue?
I think it calls into question about Brown more than anything. And it shows that we don't really know the real Scott Brown.
Do you know as a state representative that he voted to deny financial aid to Red Cross rescue workers who had volunteered with 9/11 recovery efforts?
The correlation of the numbers is off, I think. But say you are correct on the 60% consider themselves "conservative", then it means about only one out of three conservatives consider the GOP a desirable party. BHO demonstrated that the Dems can get those centrist voters. We must do more than be the party of "no".
Once again since you seem to be taking your language straight from the Dem talking points, why not just change parties?
FACT: Brown is doing well mostly AMONG INDEPENDENTS.
43% INDIES plus 23% RINOS who know they better stick with the platform = victory.
I'm not the party of NO, I'm the party of HELL NO. I will not succumb to this communist agenda and loss of American sovereignty so Obama can gain favor with his global socialist masters.
One of the reasons why conservative groups are watching ACORN and the SEIU to make sure they don't try to 'influence' voters. Brown is a conservative, not a wing nut. And if you use terms like "communist agenda and loss of American sovereignity" and "globalist socialist masters" and "HELL NO", then yes you are adhering to the far right reactionary ideology. Your thinking is not mainstream, while mine is: smaller government, smaller civil service, less taxes, less intrusion into citizen's lives, right to own and bare arms, and no overseas adventurism.
The correlation of the numbers is off, I think. But say you are correct on the 60% consider themselves "conservative", then it means about only one out of three conservatives consider the GOP a desirable party. BHO demonstrated that the Dems can get those centrist voters. We must do more than be the party of "no".
Once again since you seem to be taking your language straight from the Dem talking points, why not just change parties?
FACT: Brown is doing well mostly AMONG INDEPENDENTS.
43% INDIES plus 23% RINOS who know they better stick with the platform = victory.
I'm not the party of NO, I'm the party of HELL NO. I will not succumb to this communist agenda and loss of American sovereignty so Obama can gain favor with his global socialist masters.
All true, and one of the reasons why the dems are already lining up the lawyers to challenge the result.
Joke is no more a Republican than Obama is.
That is the problem with history. It comes around and bites you in the ass.
Does this affect their qualifications for the job? Does this mean that Cokesley has suddenly got a clue?
I think it calls into question about Brown more than anything. And it shows that we don't really know the real Scott Brown.
Do you know as a state representative that he voted to deny financial aid to Red Cross rescue workers who had volunteered with 9/11 recovery efforts?
They volunteered and Red Cross gets its own income through donations. Why give them government money? Also, if it does not make financial sense, meaning if you do not have the extra money, why do it?
[. . . . I don't believe it frankly.
The correlation of the numbers is off, I think. But say you are correct on the 60% consider themselves "conservative", then it means about only one out of three conservatives consider the GOP a desirable party. BHO demonstrated that the Dems can get those centrist voters. We must do more than be the party of "no".
Once again since you seem to be taking your language straight from the Dem talking points, why not just change parties?
FACT: Brown is doing well mostly AMONG INDEPENDENTS.
43% INDIES plus 23% RINOS who know they better stick with the platform = victory.
I'm not the party of NO, I'm the party of HELL NO. I will not succumb to this communist agenda and loss of American sovereignty so Obama can gain favor with his global socialist masters.
All true, and one of the reasons why the dems are already lining up the lawyers to challenge the result.
Joke is no more a Republican than Obama is.
Once again since you seem to be taking your language straight from the Dem talking points, why not just change parties?
FACT: Brown is doing well mostly AMONG INDEPENDENTS.
43% INDIES plus 23% RINOS who know they better stick with the platform = victory.
I'm not the party of NO, I'm the party of HELL NO. I will not succumb to this communist agenda and loss of American sovereignty so Obama can gain favor with his global socialist masters.
All true, and one of the reasons why the dems are already lining up the lawyers to challenge the result.
Joke is no more a Republican than Obama is.
Eric Holder had no problem with the " Black Panthers" standing outside a polling precinct with clubs, attemting to intimidate voters during the Presidential election. He did not prosectute, it will be interesting to see what happens here.
[. . . . I don't believe it frankly.
What you believe is immaterial. The facts are what counts.
Once again since you seem to be taking your language straight from the Dem talking points, why not just change parties?
FACT: Brown is doing well mostly AMONG INDEPENDENTS.
43% INDIES plus 23% RINOS who know they better stick with the platform = victory.
I'm not the party of NO, I'm the party of HELL NO. I will not succumb to this communist agenda and loss of American sovereignty so Obama can gain favor with his global socialist masters.
All true, and one of the reasons why the dems are already lining up the lawyers to challenge the result.
Joke is no more a Republican than Obama is.
I am a Republican, and I invite your vote in the next election, since you are not a member of the party.
[. . . . I don't believe it frankly.
What you believe is immaterial. The facts are what counts.
Really? But you just told me FACTS did NOT count -- because they would cause an 'attitude'.
All true, and one of the reasons why the dems are already lining up the lawyers to challenge the result.
Joke is no more a Republican than Obama is.
I am a Republican, and I invite your vote in the next election, since you are not a member of the party.
So tell us Joke, er Jake, what caused you to drink the Koolaid and vote for a socialist?
Brown, Coakley, And the Outrage Gap - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
Wow. A video clip has surfaced from 2008 in which Scott Brown, the Republican candidate for Senate in Massachusetts, clearly suggested that President Obama may have been born out of wedlock.
Im sure some will try to dismiss this as an isolated stray remark. But its clear if you watch the video that theres a broader context: Brown is clearly aligning himself with the Limbaugh wing of the GOP, in which slurs along these lines are standard fare. And as Steve Benen points out, claims about Obamas illegitimacy were an integral part of the birther craziness.
Thoughts?
My opinion: What an asshole.
For the record Scott:
At the age of 23, Obama had come to Hawaii to pursue his education, leaving behind a pregnant wife and infant son in his home town of Nyangoma Kogelo in Kenya. Dunham and Obama were married on the Hawaiian island of Maui on February 2, 1961, despite parental opposition from both families.[5][15] Dunham was three months pregnant at the time of her marriage.[1][5] Obama Sr. eventually informed Dunham about his first marriage in Kenya but claimed he was divorced. Years later, she would discover this was false.[14] Obama Sr.'s first wife, Kezia, later said she had granted her consent for him to marry a second wife, in keeping with Luo customs.[16]
On August 4, 1961, at the age of 18, Dunham gave birth to her first child, Barack Obama II.[17]
Ann Dunham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the record, Dogbert, the USA doesn't recognize bigamy as legal which means his second marriage was not legal, ie, obama WAS born out of wedlock by your very words.
