SCOTUS Declines To Hear Case Granting Fetal Personhood Rights

Non existent?


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

You know……,the Thing!
 
Why does the word fetus trigger you so?

Do you need a 5th grader to explain to you what a fetus is?
vf3susqse7t91.jpg
 
Dobbs was wrongly decided, of course – and like all bad law it will eventually be overturned or nullified.

Meanwhile, the Court will be continuously reminded of the mess it created with idiotic nonsense such ‘fetal personhood.’
Really? I think they are simply trying to limit the murder of infants.
 
Dobbs was wrongly decided, of course – and like all bad law it will eventually be overturned or nullified.
“Wrongly decided.”

Did you know there was this thing in the United States called the Constitution?

You might want to have your parents explain the concept to you, you perpetual mental midget.

But the key thing someone without your mental handicap and who can read plain English would tell you after reading this short English language document is that the concept of abortion never comes up, not once.
 
Last edited:
talking legally here. If a woman can legally escape the consequences of sex why shouldn't men be able to as well?
I mean just legalize hiring hit men in general if we want to be logically consistent. For abortion to be legal in any state, all contracted homicide for personal profit or convenience should also be legal.
 
I answered your question. The woman has the legal right to choose the abortion because the baby is inside of her.

As soon as a man is in the same condition they will have the same right.
Pedantic stupidity to cover for your indefensible, sexist position:
Consent to sex is consent to fatherhood and parental responsibility for men.
Consent to sex means no parental responsibility whatsoever to a woman.

This is the legal norm, it is blatantly misandrist, and you approve of this bullshit for entirely arbitrary reasons.
 
I answered your question. The woman has the legal right to choose the abortion because the baby is inside of her.

As soon as a man is in the same condition they will have the same right.

And you dodge the legal aspect and run to the whole biology thing.

Again, women if abortion is legal have a way out of parenthood. Why shouldn't men legally have the same ability?
 
And you dodge the legal aspect and run to the whole biology thing.

Again, women if abortion is legal have a way out of parenthood. Why shouldn't men legally have the same ability?

The legal aspect is tied to the whole biology thing....one cannot separate the two.

Because the man does not have a child inside of them.

Why is this so very hard for you?
 
The legal aspect is tied to the whole biology thing....one cannot separate the two.

Because the man does not have a child inside of them.

Why is this so very hard for you?

This is about the consequences AFTER the birth. Women can get out of them in abortion legal States, men cannot. Shouldn't men be able to legally "abort" the child if they don't want it but the woman does, just to be "fair"?
 
The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.
Impossible. You guys said this court was turning us into The Handmaid's Tale.
 

Forum List

Back
Top