martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,009
- 34,341
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #221
Ok, let me try this again. I will show you and you will say it doesn't restrict. That's how this game Is played.
Here is an example and you will respond the way I said you would:
In North Carolina, Republicans have proposed bills that would cut early voting. This is the definition of a restriction.
Now, read your lines and tell me "This is not a restriction it's *insert stupid adjective*"
Annnd go!
how does cutting early voting prejudice one group over another? how does it limit the right to vote? how does it restrict anyone from voting?
You people know what you are doing. what if the Democrats passed a voting law that required all voting to take place with in city limits only? You see how that works. No one is being they cant vote but a certain segment has to jump through hoops for it.
teapublicans think they are smart. I hope for the day the Populace wakes up to this group.
That would probably run afoul of local voting laws that require voting to take place within the precinct in question. So removing such law or removing such precincts would as a class be discriminitory against those who reside in the precinct, and hence illegal.
I dont recall early voters forming a specific class of voters.