tinydancer
Diamond Member
- Oct 16, 2010
- 51,845
- 12,821
Yes, that's exactly what I think. Women who make these FALSE claims should be held accountable for their actions. If I take a walk to my convenient store, get attacked on the way, I don't call the police ten years later. If I am attacked, I notify authorities so they can take immediate action.
Proof. Where is the proof these accusations are false? Because your orange buddy said so? If a woman can't prove it does not make that accusation a crime.
Well I think you were the one that robbed a bank by my house. Prove it wasn't you........
That's the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard. Prove YOU DIDN'T do something.
This tactic was revealed by Mary Mapes, Dan Rather's producer. She was still trying to defend 60 Minutes reporting aka Mythology Entertainment. My jaw dropped when I heard her say that this was proper journalism.
"We accuse, you defend" had become their mantra at CBS.
Accuser aid he did. Moore said he didn't.
Why is Moore considered the truth over the accuser?
What benefit was it for the woman to lie? Go through the embarrassment. Be drug through the mud by the Trumpette, molester supporters?
What benefit does Moore have to deny it? Ummmmm Let me think..........
What actions had occurred in the past? Testimony from several people how Moore went after high school girls at that time, mall employees who knew about Moore chasing young girls at the mall, co-workers who knew Moore chased young girls.
All favor the accuser.
You have nothing to use to defend Moore except Moore's word.
Accuer
I can't tell who is telling the truth or the motivation, but we have plenty of cases in which the accuser was telling lies, even multiple accusers, and the motivation becomes clearer as the story fades.
What is strange is all the stories told about this:
It was "common knowledge" that Moore supposedly chased high school girls. Moore was supposedly banned from the Mall, that the local Police supposedly were told to keep Moore away from teen aged girls.
And yet not a single time was this information used against Moore in his battles with the left?
He is a gun loving, anti abortion, anti gay marriage advocate.
Yet, this "common knowledge" was not discovered by any political group during his two runs for Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court? Not by the local democratic party, who must have known since it was "common knowledge"? Or by the anti gun, pro abortion or pro gay marriage groups? How realistic is that?
During his objection to removal of the 10 commandments in public places, neither the ACLU nor the Athiest organizations use this information against him, or leaked it to the story hungry press? How realistic is that?
During his fight against Gay Marriage, the ACLU or the LGBT never used this against the sitting Supreme Court Chief Justice? Nor did they leak this to the press?
It was after all, supposedly "Common Knowledge", and not a single group put out a press release? Are you thinking they wanted their candidates to lose? Not one media outlet ran a story about what supposedly happened? You would have to think the press didn't care about breaking a story or increasing their ratings?
The accusers say they are coming forward to stop these things from happening to other teens? But they never approached the DNC or leaked this information to the press when he was running for a position where he would be deciding rape cases, statutory rape cases and on and on, until now? Seems a bit odd to me since, backing up their stories would have been a piece of cake since this was all common knowledge.
You are trying to fit a square peg in a square hole.
What you want us to believe is that, Judge Moore, a far right Judge, was left alone for some damn reason. That the press, always hungry for a sexy story, either ignored these, or wasn't able to dig up these stories about the Judge. That no one in the community, including a fair number of Democrats didn't contact anyone in the press to derail his elections? Until Now? They had 40 years to bring it to the attention of every media organization in the United States, and for some damn reason, nobody did? IN FORTY YEARS.
You really want anyone to believe this? It is beyond absurd, it's down right stupid.
We are witnessing once again the Democrats tactic of "we accuse, you defend".