Seized tapes record Donald talking with Cohen about Karen McDougal payoff.

Who is karen mcdougal

The playmate Donald was banging for a year behind Melania's back, then used connections with the National Enquirer to buy her silence. When the story went public Donald denied the whole thing.

Which is kinda weird because when he was carousing around on Ivanna he invented "John Miller" and "John Barron" to plant stories about Marla Maples in a mad quest to get the word out to the whole world about it.

Dood just can't make up his mind.

"Just to clarify, when I said I wouldn't know anything about Karen MacDougal and Stürmy Daniels, I should have said I 'would'. That should be clear. But I won't admit I fucked up. Ever".

IIRC the "John Miller" and "John Baron" escapades would be about the same time he was posing for soft porn with his own daughter too.

"Not that there's anything wrong with that...."
 
Who is karen mcdougal
One of the less famous prostitutes Trump paid off.

There are free prostitutes??
Must be damn ugy
I think shes pretty!
View attachment 206090

View attachment 206091

You bet.... what a man!!
Getting in on something like that when he was in his 60's???
he was still a newlywed.... this has got to hurt Melania.... :(
why and how would you know what kind of relationship they had? why do you always supposed?
 
The only thing I could find about McDougall and Trump is that she offered him advice.

Susan McDougal offers advice to former Trump aide on special counsel with subpoena

You aren't paying attention.

Yup. Just figured out its not that Karen McDougall. thanks.

I did have to double check, though. For a moment I thought I might not have used her first name. :D
So what? Where is the crime here?

Let's put Trump under oath, when he says I didn't have sex with that women, impeach him.

Oh yeah. That's an impeachable offense.

If it were half of Congress would be impeached not to mention athletes, movie stars and company heads.

LMAO
 
No crime that I can see yet.....?

If there is a tape or any proof that Cohen for Donald arranged for the National Inquirer to catch and kill her story for the $130,000 paid to her for the story.... to silence her because it would hurt his campaign, then that would be breaking campaign finance laws, because it was not declared.... is the only thing I can think of....?

But, it seems, it would be the National Enquirer that would have made a donation, to help candidate Trump, and not declare it..... not trump or Cohen? Unless the payment by Trump's best buddy running the National Enquirer, was reimbursed somehow, by Cohen/Trump?

the story alone means nothing, other than the fact that Trump and even Hope Hicks, lied about it to the public, and that is not breaking the law.... if it were, Trump would have been locked up, ages ago....for ALL of his lies to us.
 
And now for the cultists to deny, deny, deny. Clinton had emails. But lordy, there are tapes.

:dance:

Report: Michael Cohen secretly recorded Trump talking about payoff to Playboy model

Snip:

"McDougal has said she had an affair with Trump starting in 2006 that lasted almost a year. She sold her account of that alleged liaison to The National Enquirer for $150,000 before the November 2016 election, but the Trump-friendly supermarket tabloid did not publish it before Election Day.

Giuliani told the Times that recording made by Cohen lasts for less than two minutes, and demonstrated that Trump committed no wrongdoing.

Nothing in that conversation suggests that he had any knowledge of it in advance,” Giuliani, according to the report. Giuliani said that Trump had told Cohen that if he were to pay McDougal he should do so with a check, rather than cash, so that there would be record of the payment."

So McDougal made $150,000 off selling her story? I am thinking perhaps it was Cohen who had liaisons with all these lipstick whistleblowers.
 
And now for the cultists to deny, deny, deny. Clinton had emails. But lordy, there are tapes.

:dance:
Is there anything wrong with paying her off? Or is this just another Access Hollywood moment? Tasteless but not criminal?

In the case of Stürmy Daniels it depends on whether it was done for the campaign-slash-with campaign funds. This one, I don't know about the timing. But it's the same actors.
 
And now for the cultists to deny, deny, deny. Clinton had emails. But lordy, there are tapes.

:dance:

Report: Michael Cohen secretly recorded Trump talking about payoff to Playboy model

Snip:

"McDougal has said she had an affair with Trump starting in 2006 that lasted almost a year. She sold her account of that alleged liaison to The National Enquirer for $150,000 before the November 2016 election, but the Trump-friendly supermarket tabloid did not publish it before Election Day.

Giuliani told the Times that recording made by Cohen lasts for less than two minutes, and demonstrated that Trump committed no wrongdoing.

Nothing in that conversation suggests that he had any knowledge of it in advance,” Giuliani, according to the report. Giuliani said that Trump had told Cohen that if he were to pay McDougal he should do so with a check, rather than cash, so that there would be record of the payment."

So McDougal made $150,000 off selling her story? I am thinking perhaps it was Cohen who had liaisons with all these lipstick whistleblowers.

Yup. She made `$150,000. Not bad.

Wonder if she made that kind of money with any of her other liasons??
 
Well no crime was committed if it happened.


The libtards think it should be a "campaign" expense and since it wasn't reported as such it is a violation of the campaign finance laws.
In their minds a treasonous and impeachable offense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top