Senate may change the rules to counter Pelosis childish games.

[Remodeling Maidiac]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5bebe6-2fdb-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Get it done fellas.

 

[candycorn]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?

Sure...why not. Lol

 

[kyzr]

I would add a Senate Rule that gives the House a finite time period to submit the Articles after passage or the Articles are automatically dismissed. Something like:
"The Articles of Impeachment passed in the House by a majority vote must be submitted to the Senate for trial within 72 hours after passage or said Articles are dismissed, null and void"

 

[MAGAman]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?

Sure...why not. Lol

Unfortunately for you this isn't NAZI Germany.

5 more years

 

[M14 Shooter]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?
Sure...why not. Lol

Glad to see you agree that Trump has not been impeached yet.

 

[MAGAman]

I would add a Senate Rule that gives the House a finite time period to submit the Articles after passage or the Articles are automatically dismissed. Something like:
"The Articles of Impeachment passed in the House by a majority vote must be submitted to the Senate for trial within 72 hours after passage or said Articles are dismissed, null and void"

My understanding is they will pass a rule "Deeming" the articles transmitted.

 

[kyzr]

I would add a Senate Rule that gives the House a finite time period to submit the Articles after passage or the Articles are automatically dismissed. Something like:
"The Articles of Impeachment passed in the House by a majority vote must be submitted to the Senate for trial within 72 hours after passage or said Articles are dismissed, null and void"

My understanding is they will pass a rule "Deeming" the articles transmitted.

I don't see how the senate can "deem" the Articles transmitted if the House did NOT transmit them?? That seems way outside the Senate's lane to me.
My way the Senate just says that if not transmitted timely they are void, and that should pass the constitutionality test.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5bebe6-2fdb-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Get it done fellas.

Shifty Mitch can try all the rule changes he wants, but a rule change requires 60 votes and that dumb fuck can't get 60 for that!

 

[Nostra]

Why is Nazi "Waldo" Pelousy still hiding with the partial impeachment?

 

[Nostra]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5bebe6-2fdb-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Get it done fellas.

Shifty Mitch can try all the rule changes he wants, but a rule change requires 60 votes and that dumb fuck can't get 60 for that!

So, Dimwingers in the Senate don't want to see a trial either.

 

[MAGAman]

I would add a Senate Rule that gives the House a finite time period to submit the Articles after passage or the Articles are automatically dismissed. Something like:
"The Articles of Impeachment passed in the House by a majority vote must be submitted to the Senate for trial within 72 hours after passage or said Articles are dismissed, null and void"

My understanding is they will pass a rule "Deeming" the articles transmitted.

I don't see how the senate can "deem" the Articles transmitted if the House did NOT transmit them?? That seems way outside the Senate's lane to me.
My way the Senate just says that if not transmitted timely they are void, and that should pass the constitutionality test.

Actually both sides "deem" stuff all the time.

The Senate has the "Sole" authority to try "All" impeachments.

That means either
A. The Senate can try Trump now.
Or
B. Trump isn't impeached.

There is no C.

 

[The Original Tree]

I would add a Senate Rule that gives the House a finite time period to submit the Articles after passage or the Articles are automatically dismissed. Something like:
"The Articles of Impeachment passed in the House by a majority vote must be submitted to the Senate for trial within 72 hours after passage or said Articles are dismissed, null and void"

Make that Retroactive which gives a big Middle Finger to The DemNazis who are actively working for Iran, China and Russia.

The Democrat Party Is Colluding with Iran

 

[Faun]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5bebe6-2fdb-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Get it done fellas.

Totally in their power to do so.

 

[Faun]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?

Sure...why not. Lol

Other than Senate rules, where is it written the Senate must wait for the articles to be delivered to them?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Voters decide our POTUS not partisans.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5bebe6-2fdb-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Get it done fellas.

Shifty Mitch can try all the rule changes he wants, but a rule change requires 60 votes and that dumb fuck can't get 60 for that!

Maybe they should use reconciliation like Obama did with Obamacare....

 

[MAGAman]

Rule changes take 51 votes

 

[CowboyTed]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?

Sure...why not. Lol

Other than Senate rules, where is it written the Senate must wait for the articles to be delivered to them?

Actually this is a strange one but Chief Justice John Roberts could take it upon himself to conduct the trial...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.

This means the Chief Justice could call what ever witness he likes and can continue to do so unless the Senate decide to close it down. The law overrides any Senate rules...

Honestly I think a proper trial is what we need and less of the grandstanding from both sides... All the witnesses, if Trump's team want to call Hunter they just have to show relevance to the case, but Roberts agrees so be it... Same rule for evidence and Rudy, Soland.....

Full Transparency with a proper Judge... what's wrong with that...

 

[M14 Shooter]

This means the Chief Justice could call what ever witness he likes and can continue to do so unless the Senate decide to close it down. The law overrides any Senate rules...

The senate, with a simple majority, can overrule the presiding judge.

 

[Faun]

The senate moving forward on removing the President without the articles of impeachment?

Sure...why not. Lol

Other than Senate rules, where is it written the Senate must wait for the articles to be delivered to them?

Actually this is a strange one but Chief Justice John Roberts could take it upon himself to conduct the trial...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.

This means the Chief Justice could call what ever witness he likes and can continue to do so unless the Senate decide to close it down. The law overrides any Senate rules...

Honestly I think a proper trial is what we need and less of the grandstanding from both sides... All the witnesses, if Trump's team want to call Hunter they just have to show relevance to the case, but Roberts agrees so be it... Same rule for evidence and Rudy, Soland.....

Full Transparency with a proper Judge... what's wrong with that...

He possibly could but the Senate can overrule any decisions he makes.