Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

[Freewill]

To add to the above:

Date: ---------------> Sept 10:
Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie

Grand Mufti of the Republic Ali Gomaa strongly condemned a movie which denigrates Prophet Muhammad saying it is offensive to all Muslims. Prophet Muhammad is our guide and light, he said. The film was made by some extremist expatriate Copts.

"Freedom of speech does not warrant desecrating sanctities," Gomaa said in a statement Sunday. He called on human rights activists and organizations to stand against desecrating all religions.

allAfrica.com: Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie

The Grand Mufti (Arabic: مفتي عام*) is the highest official of religious law in a Sunni or Ibadi Muslim country.

So with all you have posted where is the condemnation? Where is the condemnation for the person who could have only viewed a trailer of the movie yet spread the seeds of riot in the middle east and else where? Where is the condemnation for the actions of those Muslims over a stupidly made video? Christians are told they have to suck it up when a Crucifix is immersed in urine because after all it is just a work of art. But an obscure movie that no one saw invokes murder and riot and it is like we accept such behavior from the Muslims. Crazy.

 

[paperview]

To add to the above:

Date: ---------------> Sept 10:
Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie

Grand Mufti of the Republic Ali Gomaa strongly condemned a movie which denigrates Prophet Muhammad saying it is offensive to all Muslims. Prophet Muhammad is our guide and light, he said. The film was made by some extremist expatriate Copts.

"Freedom of speech does not warrant desecrating sanctities," Gomaa said in a statement Sunday. He called on human rights activists and organizations to stand against desecrating all religions.

allAfrica.com: Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie

The Grand Mufti (Arabic: مفتي عام*) is the highest official of religious law in a Sunni or Ibadi Muslim country.

So with all you have posted where is the condemnation? Where is the condemnation for the person who could have only viewed a trailer of the movie yet spread the seeds of riot in the middle east and else where? Where is the condemnation for the actions of those Muslims over a stupidly made video? Christians are told they have to suck it up when a Crucifix is immersed in urine because after all it is just a work of art. But an obscure movie that no one saw invokes murder and riot and it is like we accept such behavior from the Muslims. Crazy.

The religious freaks are uneducated zealots. I've said so many times.

I was providing information on how the zealotry spread after reading for the 500th time "how few youtube views" the video tabbed. And here you are repeating versions of it again -- "an obscure movie that no one saw."

They were watching snippets on Middle Eastern TV's and spreading the inflammation like wildfire.

Christians are told they have to suck it up when a Crucifix is immersed in urine because after all it is just a work of art. But an obscure movie that no one saw invokes murder and riot and it is like we accept such behavior from the Muslims. Crazy.

If you don't want to suck it up, go ahead -- be like those imbecilic religious freaks.

I will say though, it's a very strange defense to complain about how you have to "suck it up" when your Jesus is defamed.

 

[rdean]

Yes, 911 was preventable also, but W did not believe the intelligence.

Benghazi was the SECOND time Republicans refused to listen to a Clinton warning.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money

Then after Benghazi, the fuckers RAISED embassy security budgets by two fucking billion.

i didn't realize the republicans were in the executive office

budgets had nothing to do with obama's failures. nice try, but even the senate report backs me up on that.

They were on 9/11. Or did you conveniently forget?

 

[Freewill]

To add to the above:

Date: ---------------> Sept 10:
Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie





allAfrica.com: Egypt: Grand Mufti Angered By Prophet Muhammad Defaming Movie

The Grand Mufti (Arabic: مفتي عام*) is the highest official of religious law in a Sunni or Ibadi Muslim country.

So with all you have posted where is the condemnation? Where is the condemnation for the person who could have only viewed a trailer of the movie yet spread the seeds of riot in the middle east and else where? Where is the condemnation for the actions of those Muslims over a stupidly made video? Christians are told they have to suck it up when a Crucifix is immersed in urine because after all it is just a work of art. But an obscure movie that no one saw invokes murder and riot and it is like we accept such behavior from the Muslims. Crazy.

The religious freaks are uneducated zealots. I've said so many times.

I was providing information on how the zealotry spread after reading for the 500th time "how few youtube views" the video tabbed. And here you are repeating versions of it again -- "an obscure movie that no one saw."

They were watching snippets on Middle Eastern TV's and spreading the inflammation like wildfire.

Christians are told they have to suck it up when a Crucifix is immersed in urine because after all it is just a work of art. But an obscure movie that no one saw invokes murder and riot and it is like we accept such behavior from the Muslims. Crazy.

If you don't want to suck it up, go ahead -- be like those imbecilic religious freaks.

I will say though, it's a very strange defense to complain about how you have to "suck it up" when your Jesus is defamed.

It is not a defense it is an observation of how differently the Christian faith and Islam are treated. Why doesn't it matter if Christianity is insulted? Because the faith has grown since the 15 century, not so Islam. There were attacks all over the world on people who had absolutely nothing to do with the stupid video and I would guess would denounce if they did know.

 

[Freewill]

Benghazi was the SECOND time Republicans refused to listen to a Clinton warning.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money

Then after Benghazi, the fuckers RAISED embassy security budgets by two fucking billion.

i didn't realize the republicans were in the executive office

budgets had nothing to do with obama's failures. nice try, but even the senate report backs me up on that.

They were on 9/11. Or did you conveniently forget?

As was a democrat 2/26/1993

 

[Synthaholic]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

 

[Yurt]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

 

[Yurt]

Benghazi was the SECOND time Republicans refused to listen to a Clinton warning.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money

Then after Benghazi, the fuckers RAISED embassy security budgets by two fucking billion.

i didn't realize the republicans were in the executive office

budgets had nothing to do with obama's failures. nice try, but even the senate report backs me up on that.

They were on 9/11. Or did you conveniently forget?

your post was not about 9/11 moron. it is truly amazing. you will complain about pubs in the WH on 9/11, but when a dem is in the WH for benghazi, you will still blame republicans.

you're a shameless shill. you are not at all honest.

 

[percysunshine]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

And Clinton never fessed up to that one either.

 

[Synthaholic]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

 

[Yurt]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

did you even read the senate report? there was ample warning something was imminent. stevens didn't insist on minimum security. the report accurately stated that there was ample intelligence for the need for more security and obama fucked up by not sending it. period. this was far more pinpointed than 9/11 which had very broad warning signals, the warnings here were in fact far more preventable than 9/11 (which had never happened before).

 

[Freewill]

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

did you even read the senate report? there was ample warning something was imminent. stevens didn't insist on minimum security. the report accurately stated that there was ample intelligence for the need for more security and obama fucked up by not sending it. period. this was far more pinpointed than 9/11 which had very broad warning signals, the warnings here were in fact far more preventable than 9/11 (which had never happened before).

The left just never gives up. Note in his list the video is again used as an excuse when it has been very well established that it was not the video. And, since we have not caught any of the perpetrators, that I know of, we really don't know their reasoning but we do know it was 9/11.

 

[Synthaholic]

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

did you even read the senate report? there was ample warning something was imminent. stevens didn't insist on minimum security. the report accurately stated that there was ample intelligence for the need for more security and obama fucked up by not sending it. period. this was far more pinpointed than 9/11 which had very broad warning signals, the warnings here were in fact far more preventable than 9/11 (which had never happened before).

The left just never gives up. Note in his list the video is again used as an excuse when it has been very well established that it was not the video. And, since we have not caught any of the perpetrators, that I know of, we really don't know their reasoning but we do know it was 9/11.

Bullshit.

https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msi...=32.10119,42.1875&spn=57.886601,105.46875&z=3

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast

 

[LoneLaugher]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

Nope.

 

[LoneLaugher]

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

did you even read the senate report? there was ample warning something was imminent. stevens didn't insist on minimum security. the report accurately stated that there was ample intelligence for the need for more security and obama fucked up by not sending it. period. this was far more pinpointed than 9/11 which had very broad warning signals, the warnings here were in fact far more preventable than 9/11 (which had never happened before).

The report did NOT say that.

 

[Yurt]

We're not talking about blame, retard. We're talking about whether an event was preventable.

Yeah - if we had a division of Marines guarding the consulate, it prolly would have been prevented.

If the YouTube video never existed, it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't insisted on minimal security (we always listen to the people on the ground, right?) it would have been prevented.

If Stevens hadn't placed such trust in local warlords and militias, it would have been prevented.

So what?

did you even read the senate report? there was ample warning something was imminent. stevens didn't insist on minimum security. the report accurately stated that there was ample intelligence for the need for more security and obama fucked up by not sending it. period. this was far more pinpointed than 9/11 which had very broad warning signals, the warnings here were in fact far more preventable than 9/11 (which had never happened before).

The report did NOT say that.

yes it did. i linked to it several times. read it and get back to me. i bet you never read it. you read someone else's opinion of it.

 

[Yurt]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

Nope.

libs didn't blame bush? lol. you don't recall the libs jovially proclaiming how obama has kept us safe and bush didn't? my good lord, do you live under a rock?

 

[rdean]

i didn't realize the republicans were in the executive office

budgets had nothing to do with obama's failures. nice try, but even the senate report backs me up on that.

They were on 9/11. Or did you conveniently forget?

As was a democrat 2/26/1993

Which should have taught us a lesson and made 9/11 preventable. Republicans find learning very, very difficult. Probably explains the failed policies, anti education and anti science.

 

[BlindBoo]

Senate Report Concludes the Benghazi Attacks Were Preventable

So was 9/11.

and dems blamed bush for 9/11. yet, do not blame obama for benghazi.

the hypocrisy stinks.

Not quite the same. The Congressional Democrats joined hands and sang "God Bless America" with Congressional Republicans in solidarity. They were all behind the President in his future effort to capture or kill those responsible. In the case of Benghazi, the GOP candidate (and the GOP propaganda wing, aka Faux News) couldn't wait until the smoke cleared before using the assault to attack the President.