Serious questions for Trump supporters regarding this impeachment thing

[bripat9643]

Weird that if a prosecutor who was investigating Biden had a $Billion bounty put on his job, that his replacement would quietly close the investigation. They have since reopened, we will certainly fully cooperate with them, it's in our national interest to root out corruption involving US aid.

Schiff's Lies refuted by Volker:

“n May of this year, I became concerned that a negative narrative about Ukraine, fueled by assertions made by Ukraine’s departing Prosecutor General, was reaching the President of the United States, and impeding our ability to support the new Ukrainian government as robustly as I believed we should,” Volker said. “After sharing my concerns with the Ukrainian leadership, an advisor to President Zelensky asked me to connect him to the President’s personal lawyer, Mayor Rudy Giuliani.”

“I did so solely because I understood that the new Ukrainian leadership wanted to convince those, like Mayor Giuliani, who believed such a negative narrative about Ukraine, that times have changed and that, under President Zelensky, Ukraine is worthy of U.S. support,” Volker said. “I also made clear to the Ukrainians, on a number of occasions, that Mayor Giuliani is a private citizen and the President’s personal lawyer, and that he does not represent the United States government.”

Volker vehemently denied that he ever urged the Ukrainian government to dig up dirt on the Biden family.

“As you will see from the extensive text messages I am providing, which convey a sense of real-time dialogue with several different actors, Vice President Biden was never a topic of discussion,” he said.

Volker Testimony Directly Contradicted Democrat Impeachment Narrative

Let’s be accurate shall we. Nobody was investigating Hunter Biden. They had an old case investigating the ceo for Burisma for tax evasion. Hunter joined the board of directors afterwards and the case had been sitting dormant at the time Biden flew out to her the prosecutor removed for enabling corruption, which was the consensus and will of the world community. What about any of what I just said is untrue or spun. Point it out or accept it as accurate.

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

They wanted to rebrand themselves as a company that hires drug addicts who got tossed out of the Navy?

Yes. And they paid handsomely for it

That's called a "bribe," dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

His son was getting paid 83K/month, moron.

What does that have to do with Joe?

He's Hunter's father, moron.

So?

Thanks for proving that you're a moron.

Whatever you say buddy. At least this moron is open to having an honest open minded debate. You keep running though. It’s very entertaining.

I'm not "running" from anything. I'm simply not going to promise I'll agree with your claims before I see the evidence. Only a fool would do that. Would you sign a contract without reading it?

 

[Slade3200]

Let’s be accurate shall we. Nobody was investigating Hunter Biden. They had an old case investigating the ceo for Burisma for tax evasion. Hunter joined the board of directors afterwards and the case had been sitting dormant at the time Biden flew out to her the prosecutor removed for enabling corruption, which was the consensus and will of the world community. What about any of what I just said is untrue or spun. Point it out or accept it as accurate.

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

They wanted to rebrand themselves as a company that hires drug addicts who got tossed out of the Navy?

Yes. And they paid handsomely for it

That's called a "bribe," dumbass.

I bribe involves illegal activity which you’ve failed to point out. So no, it’s not a bribe, it’s compensation

 

[Slade3200]

What does that have to do with Joe?

He's Hunter's father, moron.

So?

Thanks for proving that you're a moron.

Whatever you say buddy. At least this moron is open to having an honest open minded debate. You keep running though. It’s very entertaining.

I'm not "running" from anything. I'm simply not going to promise I'll agree with your claims before I see the evidence. Only a fool would do that. Would you sign a contract without reading it?

You don’t have to promise anything. I never said anything about making promises. Do you have an honest bone in your body? All I want are parameters for agreement. It’s useless to prove a moot point and you like to ask for proof and then make the point moot which is a waste of my time. So tell me which points are significant in clearing Biden and I’ll see if I can prove them.

 

[jc456]

You don't believe that an American politician using Federal aid to a foreign country to extort money for his son is against the law?

Posts like that are the reason it's a waste of time to try reasoning with Trump haters.

Sure that sounds like it would be against the law. But as I pointed out many times that’s not what happened with Biden. He was assigned to do it for his country so your just being dishonest by ignoring that fact

You have provided no evidence to support that sleazy theory, so we'll assume it's horseshit.

If I can show evidence to support that theory does it clear Biden? Yes or no

Like I said, I'll assume it's horseshit.

You don’t have to assume, you can just vet it out and show why it’s false. That’s how you win debates. But first you need to agree on the parameters. So you tell me what conditions exonerate Biden

Debating fks like you is useless. You never post evidence! We don’t debate against fake data

 

[jc456]

He's Hunter's father, moron.

So?

Thanks for proving that you're a moron.

Whatever you say buddy. At least this moron is open to having an honest open minded debate. You keep running though. It’s very entertaining.

I'm not "running" from anything. I'm simply not going to promise I'll agree with your claims before I see the evidence. Only a fool would do that. Would you sign a contract without reading it?

You don’t have to promise anything. I never said anything about making promises. Do you have an honest bone in your body? All I want are parameters for agreement. It’s useless to prove a moot point and you like to ask for proof and then make the point moot which is a waste of my time. So tell me which points are significant in clearing Biden and I’ll see if I can prove them.

Why, he’s not intending to agree with your garbage! Ain’t ever going to happen. You live in an alternative world

 

[Zorro!]

Let’s be accurate shall we. Nobody was investigating Hunter Biden. They had an old case investigating the ceo for Burisma for tax evasion. Hunter joined the board of directors afterwards and the case had been sitting dormant at the time Biden flew out to her the prosecutor removed for enabling corruption, which was the consensus and will of the world community. What about any of what I just said is untrue or spun. Point it out or accept it as accurate.

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

They wanted to rebrand themselves as a company that hires drug addicts who got tossed out of the Navy?

Yes. And they paid handsomely for it

That's called a "bribe," dumbass.

Weird how they all go stupid on the concept of bribery, once a Democrat is involved. Bribery IS an impeachable offense. Biden is now ineligible to be President because he took bribes and Vice President.

 

[jc456]

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

They wanted to rebrand themselves as a company that hires drug addicts who got tossed out of the Navy?

Yes. And they paid handsomely for it

That's called a "bribe," dumbass.

I bribe involves illegal activity which you’ve failed to point out. So no, it’s not a bribe, it’s compensation

The bribe was by the company

 

[Zorro!]

Oh really? Then do tell, who went after the energy company after Shokin was fired, and what were the results?

No indictments by either prosecutor. Do you know what and who they were investigating?

Weird that if a prosecutor who was investigating Biden had a $Billion bounty put on his job, that his replacement would quietly close the investigation. They have since reopened, we will certainly fully cooperate with them, it's in our national interest to root out corruption involving US aid.

Schiff's Lies refuted by Volker:

“n May of this year, I became concerned that a negative narrative about Ukraine, fueled by assertions made by Ukraine’s departing Prosecutor General, was reaching the President of the United States, and impeding our ability to support the new Ukrainian government as robustly as I believed we should,” Volker said. “After sharing my concerns with the Ukrainian leadership, an advisor to President Zelensky asked me to connect him to the President’s personal lawyer, Mayor Rudy Giuliani.”

“I did so solely because I understood that the new Ukrainian leadership wanted to convince those, like Mayor Giuliani, who believed such a negative narrative about Ukraine, that times have changed and that, under President Zelensky, Ukraine is worthy of U.S. support,” Volker said. “I also made clear to the Ukrainians, on a number of occasions, that Mayor Giuliani is a private citizen and the President’s personal lawyer, and that he does not represent the United States government.”

Volker vehemently denied that he ever urged the Ukrainian government to dig up dirt on the Biden family.

“As you will see from the extensive text messages I am providing, which convey a sense of real-time dialogue with several different actors, Vice President Biden was never a topic of discussion,” he said.

Volker Testimony Directly Contradicted Democrat Impeachment Narrative

Let’s be accurate shall we. Nobody was investigating Hunter Biden. They had an old case investigating the ceo for Burisma for tax evasion. Hunter joined the board of directors afterwards and the case had been sitting dormant at the time Biden flew out to her the prosecutor removed for enabling corruption, which was the consensus and will of the world community. What about any of what I just said is untrue or spun. Point it out or accept it as accurate.

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

Stuffing $Millions into the Vice President's son's pocket is a great way to rebuild relations! Bribery is an impeachable offense. Since Biden was all about the bribes as Vice President, he isn't qualified to President.

 

[Zorro!]

I haven’t heard the case for this type “extortion” in foreign interaction being an illegal act. Care to point out the law? Careful though, you might also be accusing Trump of the same crime.

You don't believe that an American politician using Federal aid to a foreign country to extort money for his son is against the law?

Posts like that are the reason it's a waste of time to try reasoning with Trump haters.

Sure that sounds like it would be against the law. But as I pointed out many times that’s not what happened with Biden. He was assigned to do it for his country so your just being dishonest by ignoring that fact

When someone is assigned a job that they know has conflicts, they recuse themselves.
The end.

True but hunter Biden’s bird position and the task of rooting out corruption in Ukraine are pretty dam far removed. Y’all try to distort the narrative to make it seem like Joe has a guy to save his son but that’s just not an accurate account of the situation. Not even close

Hunter’s company to joe, your kid want 50k a month, remove that prosecutor! Bam, prosecutor gone hunter 50k. Hmmm

Biden was the Best Vice President Money could buy!

And it looks like they are all engaged in bribery though this technique of laundered it through family members.

Amazing Coincidence That Nancy Pelosi’s Son Also Has Business Connections With Ukraine.

Schiff’s Own Ties to Ukraine Raise Questions.

Joe Biden rages at reporter who asks him about his son and Ukraine.

These greedy crooks are so blinded by their rage at Trump that they are going to bring down their entire scam!

 

[jc456]

You don't believe that an American politician using Federal aid to a foreign country to extort money for his son is against the law?

Posts like that are the reason it's a waste of time to try reasoning with Trump haters.

Sure that sounds like it would be against the law. But as I pointed out many times that’s not what happened with Biden. He was assigned to do it for his country so your just being dishonest by ignoring that fact

When someone is assigned a job that they know has conflicts, they recuse themselves.
The end.

True but hunter Biden’s bird position and the task of rooting out corruption in Ukraine are pretty dam far removed. Y’all try to distort the narrative to make it seem like Joe has a guy to save his son but that’s just not an accurate account of the situation. Not even close

Hunter’s company to joe, your kid want 50k a month, remove that prosecutor! Bam, prosecutor gone hunter 50k. Hmmm

Biden was the Best Vice President Money could buy!

And it looks like they are all engaged in bribery though this technique of laundered it through family members.

Amazing Coincidence That Nancy Pelosi’s Son Also Has Business Connections With Ukraine.

Schiff’s Own Ties to Ukraine Raise Questions.

Joe Biden rages at reporter who asks him about his son and Ukraine.

These greedy crooks are so blinded by their rage at Trump that they are going to bring down their entire scam!

Funny how trump’s kids are game and Biden’s isn’t? Hahaha hahaha hahaha hahaha

 

[Zorro!]

That and his defense for Joe by him suggesting that Joe was influenced by foreign nations to put pressure on something that broke U.S. laws ??

Which laws got broken? And the support from our allies, congress and government prove that he wasn’t acting alone to cover for his son. Your argument is dead

Wrong. You haven't demonstrated any such support.

I have and I could again. Just tell me that a demonstration of that support clears Biden of wrong doing and then I’ll take the time to show it again.

Sorry, turd, I don't agree to things before I know what I'm agreeing to.

You would make a good used car salesman.

I didn’t think you would because once you admit to something you can’t weasel away from it. That’s the difference between partisan trolls and objective thinkers. You don’t have an open mind so you will never agree to exonerate joe no matter what, you just want to spin up anything that makes him look bad. Your tactics are very transparent .

He's got foreign governments, while he was Vice President, stuffing $Millions and $Billions in his coke addled son's pockets. The Vice Presidency is an office of trust and he sold it. That was his choice, not one we made for him.

 

[Zorro!]

Sure that sounds like it would be against the law. But as I pointed out many times that’s not what happened with Biden. He was assigned to do it for his country so your just being dishonest by ignoring that fact

You have provided no evidence to support that sleazy theory, so we'll assume it's horseshit.

If I can show evidence to support that theory does it clear Biden? Yes or no

Like I said, I'll assume it's horseshit.

You don’t have to assume, you can just vet it out and show why it’s false. That’s how you win debates. But first you need to agree on the parameters. So you tell me what conditions exonerate Biden

Debating fks like you is useless. You never post evidence! We don’t debate against fake data

Why would you defend a crook like Biden who was given and office of trust and sold it to foreigners?

 

[edward37]

Which laws got broken? And the support from our allies, congress and government prove that he wasn’t acting alone to cover for his son. Your argument is dead

Wrong. You haven't demonstrated any such support.

I have and I could again. Just tell me that a demonstration of that support clears Biden of wrong doing and then I’ll take the time to show it again.

Sorry, turd, I don't agree to things before I know what I'm agreeing to.

You would make a good used car salesman.

I didn’t think you would because once you admit to something you can’t weasel away from it. That’s the difference between partisan trolls and objective thinkers. You don’t have an open mind so you will never agree to exonerate joe no matter what, you just want to spin up anything that makes him look bad. Your tactics are very transparent .

Joe's a crook.

WE MUST HAVE IMPEACHMENT NOW TO RESCUE US FROM THIS NIGHTMARE OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY: U.S. adds 136,000 jobs in September, unemployment rate hits 50-year low. I mean if all the proles have jobs and money, how can they be expected to defer to their betters?

Trump's is a lifetime of crooked dealings Now He is accused of breaking our laws It was expected. It was also expected for republicans to throw all their crap against the wall hoping something sticks It's called their Hillary defense

 

[Slade3200]

No indictments by either prosecutor. Do you know what and who they were investigating?

Weird that if a prosecutor who was investigating Biden had a $Billion bounty put on his job, that his replacement would quietly close the investigation. They have since reopened, we will certainly fully cooperate with them, it's in our national interest to root out corruption involving US aid.

Schiff's Lies refuted by Volker:

“n May of this year, I became concerned that a negative narrative about Ukraine, fueled by assertions made by Ukraine’s departing Prosecutor General, was reaching the President of the United States, and impeding our ability to support the new Ukrainian government as robustly as I believed we should,” Volker said. “After sharing my concerns with the Ukrainian leadership, an advisor to President Zelensky asked me to connect him to the President’s personal lawyer, Mayor Rudy Giuliani.”

“I did so solely because I understood that the new Ukrainian leadership wanted to convince those, like Mayor Giuliani, who believed such a negative narrative about Ukraine, that times have changed and that, under President Zelensky, Ukraine is worthy of U.S. support,” Volker said. “I also made clear to the Ukrainians, on a number of occasions, that Mayor Giuliani is a private citizen and the President’s personal lawyer, and that he does not represent the United States government.”

Volker vehemently denied that he ever urged the Ukrainian government to dig up dirt on the Biden family.

“As you will see from the extensive text messages I am providing, which convey a sense of real-time dialogue with several different actors, Vice President Biden was never a topic of discussion,” he said.

Volker Testimony Directly Contradicted Democrat Impeachment Narrative

Let’s be accurate shall we. Nobody was investigating Hunter Biden. They had an old case investigating the ceo for Burisma for tax evasion. Hunter joined the board of directors afterwards and the case had been sitting dormant at the time Biden flew out to her the prosecutor removed for enabling corruption, which was the consensus and will of the world community. What about any of what I just said is untrue or spun. Point it out or accept it as accurate.

Hunter Biden being part of that company under investigation, included him in the investigation if on the board at the time right ?

Very indirectly. The investigation was started for tax evasion which happened before hunter even joined. They asked hunter to join in order to rebrand themselves and rebuild relations with the US and allied countries.

Stuffing $Millions into the Vice President's son's pocket is a great way to rebuild relations! Bribery is an impeachable offense. Since Biden was all about the bribes as Vice President, he isn't qualified to President.

How exactly does hiring the VPs son implicate the VP in an illegal act of bribery. Y’all are nuts but I’d love to hear you try and rationalize that

 

[Slade3200]

Which laws got broken? And the support from our allies, congress and government prove that he wasn’t acting alone to cover for his son. Your argument is dead

Wrong. You haven't demonstrated any such support.

I have and I could again. Just tell me that a demonstration of that support clears Biden of wrong doing and then I’ll take the time to show it again.

Sorry, turd, I don't agree to things before I know what I'm agreeing to.

You would make a good used car salesman.

I didn’t think you would because once you admit to something you can’t weasel away from it. That’s the difference between partisan trolls and objective thinkers. You don’t have an open mind so you will never agree to exonerate joe no matter what, you just want to spin up anything that makes him look bad. Your tactics are very transparent .

He's got foreign governments, while he was Vice President, stuffing $Millions and $Billions in his coke addled son's pockets. The Vice Presidency is an office of trust and he sold it. That was his choice, not one we made for him.

What do you mean “he’s got” like you think he arranged to get paid through his son or that he used his office to get his son the position? Got any proof of that or are you just blowing smoke?

 

[Slade3200]

You have provided no evidence to support that sleazy theory, so we'll assume it's horseshit.

If I can show evidence to support that theory does it clear Biden? Yes or no

Like I said, I'll assume it's horseshit.

You don’t have to assume, you can just vet it out and show why it’s false. That’s how you win debates. But first you need to agree on the parameters. So you tell me what conditions exonerate Biden

Debating fks like you is useless. You never post evidence! We don’t debate against fake data

Why would you defend a crook like Biden who was given and office of trust and sold it to foreigners?

Because he didn’t do any of that. 8 years serving as an honorable VP, leaving office extremely popular and now all of a sudden he is crooked joe right when he is running against Trump. It can’t be any more transparent what’s going on. Open your eyes man, this is pathetic.

 

[beagle9]

Again, so "consensus" makes extortion ok.....how very enlightened of you.

I haven’t heard the case for this type “extortion” in foreign interaction being an illegal act. Care to point out the law? Careful though, you might also be accusing Trump of the same crime.

You don't believe that an American politician using Federal aid to a foreign country to extort money for his son is against the law?

Posts like that are the reason it's a waste of time to try reasoning with Trump haters.

Sure that sounds like it would be against the law. But as I pointed out many times that’s not what happened with Biden. He was assigned to do it for his country so your just being dishonest by ignoring that fact

When someone is assigned a job that they know has conflicts, they recuse themselves.
The end.

True but hunter Biden’s bird position and the task of rooting out corruption in Ukraine are pretty dam far removed. Y’all try to distort the narrative to make it seem like Joe has a guy to save his son but that’s just not an accurate account of the situation. Not even close

If only Joe's son wasn't coincidentally working on that board, then it would be what ?? Just old Joe being Joe when he bragged about that prosecutor being fired ? Well whatta ya know right, he was fired.

 

[beagle9]

If I can show evidence to support that theory does it clear Biden? Yes or no

Like I said, I'll assume it's horseshit.

You don’t have to assume, you can just vet it out and show why it’s false. That’s how you win debates. But first you need to agree on the parameters. So you tell me what conditions exonerate Biden

Debating fks like you is useless. You never post evidence! We don’t debate against fake data

Why would you defend a crook like Biden who was given and office of trust and sold it to foreigners?

Because he didn’t do any of that. 8 years serving as an honorable VP, leaving office extremely popular and now all of a sudden he is crooked joe right when he is running against Trump. It can’t be any more transparent what’s going on. Open your eyes man, this is pathetic.

And close our ears when Joe goes on a rant eh ? LOL.

 

[beagle9]

You don't believe that an American politician using Federal aid to a foreign country to extort money for his son is against the law?

Posts like that are the reason it's a waste of time to try reasoning with Trump haters.

Whacked out Slade has me on ignore, cause he can’t take my facts

Slade believes he doesn't have to support his claims with evidence if you don't agree to cave no matter what kind of evidence he posts.

I just do that with you because you’ve play the rabbit hole tactic one to many times. When I take the time to show evidence and you dismiss or pivot it tells me that you’re not worth the time. So yes, you have a qualifier from now on if you wanna see proof

ROFL! Your evidence never proves what you claim. You're asking me to agree before I've even seen it that your evidence is credible and that it actually supports your claim.

Sorry, douchebag, I don't play that game.

You can argue the validity of the evidence, I never said you couldn’t do that. But I want to set up the standards of what clears Joe in your eyes. If it can be proven the the global community wanted this guy gone and joe was assigned to get him out, does that clear him of the fake accusations you all are making? If yes, then I’ll happily show the evidence and you’re free to challenge it.

Joe works for the global community ??