Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.i don't care what you think simply because you are not doing me.dear, not having a clue and a Cause is why you believe what you do.Goodness!!! How can anyone make any sense out of this nonsensical loon?You must speak crazy.
You should commit yourself to the nearest mental institution.
The thought makes me gag.
It wasn't used at Cannae. Like i said; it may be stratagem, but usually due to a perceived weakness.only as a stratagem, not a necessity, there is a difference.why chose those extremes but for straw man purposes.yes, as equals for equality purposes. only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile.
Absolute nonsense.
As an example, let's suppose there are two attractive women vying for the attentions of an attractive man. One walks up, opens her shirt, and says "You look hot, why don't we go have sex?". They other flirts, makes eye contact, and teases a bit.
The second woman is certainly not inferior. She knows that many men prefer a woman who knows how to play.
only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile. this is accepted military doctrine that applies to real life situations in non-warfare scenarios.
No, it is NOT accepted military doctrine. Guile is used very often by superior forces.
And yes, it is an extreme example. But then, the first woman is not so far off from what you have claimed is the only way a woman will prove she is truly interested in equality. The second is a solid example of reality.
Whether it is a necessity or not is not relevant. Guile has been used by superior forces for centuries, if for no other reason than to reduce casualties.
But your claim that only inferors resort to guile, and that this is accepted military doctrine is simply bullshit. Unless you would care to show any military expert who made such a claim.
no; i say that because they prefer lies and liars to honesty as a form of respect toward fellow human beings.
run out of logic and reason so soon, dear?
it must be about equality if it happens in the non-porn sector as well; when was non-verbal communication in the non-porn sector considered more valuable than a well reasoned business plan openly discussed.that it is not about honesty as a form of equality.that honesty is not the problem, dear. socialism requires social morals for free, unlike capitalism.trade is not "impersonal" with any "emotional investment".
Correct. But cognitive dissonance is about conflicting beliefs within a person. Who has such a conflict? I don't. I understand that there is a personal element to every social interaction, and even more with sexual interaction.
what? only Your inventions are inventive, mr.deflector?no more "inventive" than yours, mr.deflector.
And what have I deflected? I have tried to stay on topic, despite your attempts to derail and hide behind nonsensical uses of less common wording.
Two answers. Yet, two answers that were not answers to the questions I asked.
Lets try again, shall we?
" But cognitive dissonance is about conflicting beliefs within a person. Who has such a conflict? "
"And what have I deflected?"
It is not about equality. You are wanting to determine the boundaries of the social interaction, and giving the woman no say in the matter. That is not equality.
some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.i don't care what you think simply because you are not doing me.dear, not having a clue and a Cause is why you believe what you do.Goodness!!! How can anyone make any sense out of this nonsensical loon?
You should commit yourself to the nearest mental institution.
The thought makes me gag.
dear any appeal to any fallacy can be a lie as that form of ignorance of sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation.no; i say that because they prefer lies and liars to honesty as a form of respect toward fellow human beings.
Women don't prefer liars. Many are just hopeless romantics, wishing the fairy tale love will come true for them. You can perhaps call them delusional or in denial, but, most women want Pretty Woman to be a possibility.....
Not all women are firmly grounded in reality and many are quite naïve....
run out of logic and reason so soon, dear?
Gotta do some work today....
and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.i don't care what you think simply because you are not doing me.dear, not having a clue and a Cause is why you believe what you do.
You should commit yourself to the nearest mental institution.
The thought makes me gag.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.i don't care what you think simply because you are not doing me.You should commit yourself to the nearest mental institution.
The thought makes me gag.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
still wrong and claiming you are not really like that, dear?and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.i don't care what you think simply because you are not doing me.
The thought makes me gag.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
Stick to plastic chicks. They are the only ones willing.
i am not claiming i did; have i mentioned i also have low numbers and little practice, and especially, floozies like you should respect that.i understand that. i merely don't want to play silly chic games if they aren't doing me everyday, and twice on Sundays.it is about honesty and not having to lie for sex, dear.If a girl walks up to a guy and says, I might be interested but not sure. I want to have about 20 dates, maybe we'll have sex maybe not..... will the guy ask her out? Depends if he likes a challenge.
Like all interpersonal relationships, it's "risk reward"
Men don't always get laid
Women don't always get prince charming and so on........
I was sitting here thinking. I am 55 years old and have had sex with quite a few ladies in my life. I don't recall lying to any of them. So you can have plenty of sex and be honest. But you have to have something to offer or have to develop the relationship, even if it is not a long term one.
If the women want to play a game before deciding if you are worthy of their charms, you can either play or do without. It really is that simple. You don't get to decide whether there are games played. Only whether you play.
It wasn't used at Cannae. Like i said; it may be stratagem, but usually due to a perceived weakness.only as a stratagem, not a necessity, there is a difference.why chose those extremes but for straw man purposes.Absolute nonsense.
As an example, let's suppose there are two attractive women vying for the attentions of an attractive man. One walks up, opens her shirt, and says "You look hot, why don't we go have sex?". They other flirts, makes eye contact, and teases a bit.
The second woman is certainly not inferior. She knows that many men prefer a woman who knows how to play.
only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile. this is accepted military doctrine that applies to real life situations in non-warfare scenarios.
No, it is NOT accepted military doctrine. Guile is used very often by superior forces.
And yes, it is an extreme example. But then, the first woman is not so far off from what you have claimed is the only way a woman will prove she is truly interested in equality. The second is a solid example of reality.
Whether it is a necessity or not is not relevant. Guile has been used by superior forces for centuries, if for no other reason than to reduce casualties.
But your claim that only inferors resort to guile, and that this is accepted military doctrine is simply bullshit. Unless you would care to show any military expert who made such a claim.
still wrong and claiming you are not really like that, dear?and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.The thought makes me gag.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
Stick to plastic chicks. They are the only ones willing.
surrender for what? i am the one with the lowest numbers. does abstinence and just saying "no" to silly chic trics, mean nothing to persons of alleged morals.i am not claiming i did; have i mentioned i also have low numbers and little practice, and especially, floozies like you should respect that.i understand that. i merely don't want to play silly chic games if they aren't doing me everyday, and twice on Sundays.it is about honesty and not having to lie for sex, dear.
I was sitting here thinking. I am 55 years old and have had sex with quite a few ladies in my life. I don't recall lying to any of them. So you can have plenty of sex and be honest. But you have to have something to offer or have to develop the relationship, even if it is not a long term one.
If the women want to play a game before deciding if you are worthy of their charms, you can either play or do without. It really is that simple. You don't get to decide whether there are games played. Only whether you play.
Floozy?? You just called me a "floozy"??? LMAO!!!!!
Your surrender is accepted.
dear, it was about having a superior force and "knowing" you should win.It wasn't used at Cannae. Like i said; it may be stratagem, but usually due to a perceived weakness.only as a stratagem, not a necessity, there is a difference.why chose those extremes but for straw man purposes.
only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile. this is accepted military doctrine that applies to real life situations in non-warfare scenarios.
No, it is NOT accepted military doctrine. Guile is used very often by superior forces.
And yes, it is an extreme example. But then, the first woman is not so far off from what you have claimed is the only way a woman will prove she is truly interested in equality. The second is a solid example of reality.
Whether it is a necessity or not is not relevant. Guile has been used by superior forces for centuries, if for no other reason than to reduce casualties.
But your claim that only inferors resort to guile, and that this is accepted military doctrine is simply bullshit. Unless you would care to show any military expert who made such a claim.
So it wasn't used in one battle, and you claim that makes it military doctrine? lol Go play, little boy. You are obviously inventing shit.
It wasn't used at Cannae. Like i said; it may be stratagem, but usually due to a perceived weakness.only as a stratagem, not a necessity, there is a difference.why chose those extremes but for straw man purposes.Absolute nonsense.
As an example, let's suppose there are two attractive women vying for the attentions of an attractive man. One walks up, opens her shirt, and says "You look hot, why don't we go have sex?". They other flirts, makes eye contact, and teases a bit.
The second woman is certainly not inferior. She knows that many men prefer a woman who knows how to play.
only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile. this is accepted military doctrine that applies to real life situations in non-warfare scenarios.
No, it is NOT accepted military doctrine. Guile is used very often by superior forces.
And yes, it is an extreme example. But then, the first woman is not so far off from what you have claimed is the only way a woman will prove she is truly interested in equality. The second is a solid example of reality.
Whether it is a necessity or not is not relevant. Guile has been used by superior forces for centuries, if for no other reason than to reduce casualties.
But your claim that only inferors resort to guile, and that this is accepted military doctrine is simply bullshit. Unless you would care to show any military expert who made such a claim.
is it true that only lesbians don't want heterosexual, full body massage?still wrong and claiming you are not really like that, dear?and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.some chics look pretty hot when they are gagging. good thing i don't care about you since you are not doing me.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
Stick to plastic chicks. They are the only ones willing.
Like what?
surrender for what? i am the one with the lowest numbers. does abstinence and just saying "no" to silly chic trics, mean nothing to persons of alleged morals.i am not claiming i did; have i mentioned i also have low numbers and little practice, and especially, floozies like you should respect that.i understand that. i merely don't want to play silly chic games if they aren't doing me everyday, and twice on Sundays.I was sitting here thinking. I am 55 years old and have had sex with quite a few ladies in my life. I don't recall lying to any of them. So you can have plenty of sex and be honest. But you have to have something to offer or have to develop the relationship, even if it is not a long term one.
If the women want to play a game before deciding if you are worthy of their charms, you can either play or do without. It really is that simple. You don't get to decide whether there are games played. Only whether you play.
Floozy?? You just called me a "floozy"??? LMAO!!!!!
Your surrender is accepted.
dear, it was a clear example of that doctrine. guile is used by inferior force against superior force. Sun Tzu proved that.It wasn't used at Cannae. Like i said; it may be stratagem, but usually due to a perceived weakness.only as a stratagem, not a necessity, there is a difference.why chose those extremes but for straw man purposes.
only inferiors who know they are not equal have to resort to guile. this is accepted military doctrine that applies to real life situations in non-warfare scenarios.
No, it is NOT accepted military doctrine. Guile is used very often by superior forces.
And yes, it is an extreme example. But then, the first woman is not so far off from what you have claimed is the only way a woman will prove she is truly interested in equality. The second is a solid example of reality.
Whether it is a necessity or not is not relevant. Guile has been used by superior forces for centuries, if for no other reason than to reduce casualties.
But your claim that only inferors resort to guile, and that this is accepted military doctrine is simply bullshit. Unless you would care to show any military expert who made such a claim.
I checked to make sure, since I was unaware of a battle at Cannae since Hannibal's defeat of the Roman forces.
So one example in 2,200 years and you claim it is "military doctrine"????
You are not a troll. You are simply a child trying to pretend to intellect and more. Come back when you have some hair on your balls.
is it true that only lesbians don't want heterosexual, full body massage?still wrong and claiming you are not really like that, dear?and, you have been wrong a thousand times; i can type all i want with free chics on the Internet; all i really need is nice girls who are willing to be friends, and come over and Expect me to get really good at full body massage.If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Daniel, get yourself a blowup doll.
Stick to plastic chicks. They are the only ones willing.
Like what?
dear, you miss the point as usual; it is about honesty, not me, personally.surrender for what? i am the one with the lowest numbers. does abstinence and just saying "no" to silly chic trics, mean nothing to persons of alleged morals.i am not claiming i did; have i mentioned i also have low numbers and little practice, and especially, floozies like you should respect that.i understand that. i merely don't want to play silly chic games if they aren't doing me everyday, and twice on Sundays.
If the women want to play a game before deciding if you are worthy of their charms, you can either play or do without. It really is that simple. You don't get to decide whether there are games played. Only whether you play.
Floozy?? You just called me a "floozy"??? LMAO!!!!!
Your surrender is accepted.
I have no problem with your numbers or your abstinence. I also have no problem with your refusal to play the games.
I simply took issue with your claims that women do not want equality unless they volunteer to submit to being used by you. I took exception to your demands that women give you "your turn".
