Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
And you run cover for them by kicking up a dust storm of nonsense to obfuscate every attempt to bring these lying bastards to justice.Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
How naive can somebody get? Congress has something like a 12% approval rating because Americans feel they are being lied to constantly. Not very Christian to lie, yet they all took the oath of office and swear to uphold the Constitution. Since there are no atheists holding office, how the phuck do you know they wouldn't do a better job?
One must be a faithful adherent to an organized religion in order to develop a moral code? Without a professed faith, people cannot have have morality?No one is claiming that, genius.A religious standard for office holders. Who here claims to be constitutional literalists?
We are talking a moral standard that atheists by definition cannot meet because they have no basis whatsoever for an objective moral standard, as not allowing pedophiles to hold office would not be a religious standard.
lol, you libtards are just too fucking stupid.
And yet I am sure that Jefferson would agree that we should not vote for idiots that deny Newtonian physics or Euclidian geometry.More Thomas Jefferson
Our civil rights have no dependence upon our religious opinions more than our opinions in physics or geometry.
-- Thomas Jefferson, Statute for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers, 2:545
Wow, this one is extra stupid. See the fucking Constitution, bitch.Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
I didnt say that, dude.One must be a faithful adherent to an organized religion in order to develop a moral code? Without a professed faith, people cannot have have morality?No one is claiming that, genius.A religious standard for office holders. Who here claims to be constitutional literalists?
We are talking a moral standard that atheists by definition cannot meet because they have no basis whatsoever for an objective moral standard, as not allowing pedophiles to hold office would not be a religious standard.
lol, you libtards are just too fucking stupid.
Lol, now the atheistic cretins are engaging in back slapping ataboys to encourage each other. Pretty much signals that they realize they lost the debate.Wow, this one is extra stupid. See the fucking Constitution, bitch.Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
Yep. O/P is too stoopid to realize that the Constitution protects a citizen from being prejudged by religion or race, or lack of religion. It's called the First Amendment. (First Amendment)
No one is claiming that, genius.A religious standard for office holders. Who here claims to be constitutional literalists?
We are talking a moral standard that atheists by definition cannot meet because they have no basis whatsoever for an objective moral standard, as not allowing pedophiles to hold office would not be a religious standard.
lol, you libtards are just too fucking stupid.
Lol, now the atheistic cretins are engaging in back slapping ataboys to encourage each other. Pretty much signals that they realize they lost the debate.Wow, this one is extra stupid. See the fucking Constitution, bitch.Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
Yep. O/P is too stoopid to realize that the Constitution protects a citizen from being prejudged by religion or race, or lack of religion. It's called the First Amendment. (First Amendment)
Atheism is no more protected by the First Amendment than is pedophilia.
Lol, now the atheistic cretins are engaging in back slapping ataboys to encourage each other. Pretty much signals that they realize they lost the debate.Wow, this one is extra stupid. See the fucking Constitution, bitch.Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
Yep. O/P is too stoopid to realize that the Constitution protects a citizen from being prejudged by religion or race, or lack of religion. It's called the First Amendment. (First Amendment)
Atheism is no more protected by the First Amendment than is pedophilia.
WTF? You're trying to compare a belief system to a criminal act? You know someone has lost the debate when they go to such illogical extremes.
Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
I would be perfectly happy if we took those priests and put them against a wall and shot their brains out. It would be doing the Catholic church a huge favor.No one is claiming that, genius.A religious standard for office holders. Who here claims to be constitutional literalists?
We are talking a moral standard that atheists by definition cannot meet because they have no basis whatsoever for an objective moral standard, as not allowing pedophiles to hold office would not be a religious standard.
lol, you libtards are just too fucking stupid.
How many politicians holding office are Catholics?
How many men and boys in this country have filed law suits after being molested by a Catholic priest?
(Thanks for stepping in it. I can smell it from here)
Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
-- from U.S. Constitution; Article VI
Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
-- from U.S. Constitution; Article VI
How does an atheist that believes in no God take an oath in all seriousness that entails swearing to the God that they do not believe in?
They cannot possibly do so and therefore they are unfit for any office that requires such an oath be administered.
Which means bullshit. These cretins have no moral basis for considering blatant lies to be anything more than clever social camouflage.I would assume they give an Affirmation
Which means bullshit. These cretins have no moral basis for considering blatant lies to be anything more than clever social camouflage.I would assume they give an Affirmation
Not for atheists, no.Which means bullshit. These cretins have no moral basis for considering blatant lies to be anything more than clever social camouflage.I would assume they give an Affirmation
So... no difference one way or the other?
Not for atheists, no.Which means bullshit. These cretins have no moral basis for considering blatant lies to be anything more than clever social camouflage.I would assume they give an Affirmation
So... no difference one way or the other?
And yet those priests have a faith. Where did their moral code spring from?I would be perfectly happy if we took those priests and put them against a wall and shot their brains out. It would be doing the Catholic church a huge favor.No one is claiming that, genius.A religious standard for office holders. Who here claims to be constitutional literalists?
We are talking a moral standard that atheists by definition cannot meet because they have no basis whatsoever for an objective moral standard, as not allowing pedophiles to hold office would not be a religious standard.
lol, you libtards are just too fucking stupid.
How many politicians holding office are Catholics?
How many men and boys in this country have filed law suits after being molested by a Catholic priest?
(Thanks for stepping in it. I can smell it from here)
please show us where an oath to a god is in the constitution? or using a bible?Elected officials have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Atheists and progressives reject the Founders and believe that humans have no inherant rights beyond what the state decides on a whim; since they don't believe in the Constitution why should they be allowed to run for office?
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
-- from U.S. Constitution; Article VI
How does an atheist that believes in no God take an oath in all seriousness that entails swearing to the God that they do not believe in?
They cannot possibly do so and therefore they are unfit for any office that requires such an oath be administered.
