Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Most child molesters are members of the family who, when not molesting children, are making them, or at least shagging adults of the opposite sex. Regardless how their predilections are augmented to include children, it's hard to argue that they're not heterosexual.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

as long as homosexuals stick with consenting adults, what the hell do you care?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

Who's proposing we normalize sexual child abuse?

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Most child molesters are members of the family who, when not molesting children, are making them, or at least shagging adults of the opposite sex. Regardless how their predilections are augmented to include children, it's hard to argue that they're not heterosexual.

That is as irrelevant as when homosexuals assault children.

ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS any adult relationship a pedophile has is merely one of illusion to temporarily satisfy what the pedophile knows they would get in trouble for if they attempted to get with a child EVERY time they had an urge.

It's nothing more than an attempt to appear normal. Sometimes they may choose a homosexual relationship, but they are neither heterosexual nor homosexual, they are pedophiles.

Liken it to guys who go to prison and have gay sex even though they aren't gay. Why? Because they succumb to "gay sex is better than no sex" same as pedophiles, they have to be careful about their crimes, so adult sex is better than no sex.

That's all it is.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

I'll bet you a thousand dollars right now that more men who are in straight adults relationships have sexually assaulted children than women who are in adult homosexual relationships have.

In fact, I'l guarantee that.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

Actually they can get married to each other and they will very soon. I can't wait to get the wedding invitation. What are you going to do to stop them? And they have babysat my children for the last decade. And I sure as hell trust them more than I would ever trust somebody like you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

Who's proposing we normalize sexual child abuse?

Who? Oh such is the basis of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality... ONE of the charter organizations of which is NAMBLA... . Also such was the life long ambition of Alfred Kinsey, the founder of the Kinsey Institute... a leading institution in the absurd scientific edict: Homosexuality is normal sexuality. Then there the APA (American Psychiatric Association) who released a white paper which concluded "...some children may actually benefit from a caring sexual relationship with a loving adult.

Of course that's just off the top of my head... And THAT is just here in the US. The list grows exponentially, where one considers the immoral abyss that is Europe.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

Who's proposing we normalize sexual child abuse?

Who? Oh such is the basis of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality... ONE of the charter organizations of which is NAMBLA... . Also such was the life long ambition of Alfred Kinsey, the founder of the Kinsey Institute... a leading institution in the absurd scientific edict: Homosexuality is normal sexuality. Then there the APA (American Psychiatric Association) who released a white paper which concluded "...some children may actually benefit from a caring sexual relationship with a loving adult.

Of course that's just off the top of my head... And THAT is just here in the US. The list grows exponentially, where one considers the immoral abyss that is Europe.

So you're terrified of NAMBLA convincing everyone it's ok to bugger little children? Get help. Seriously.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

I'll bet you a thousand dollars right now that more men who are in straight adults relationships have sexually assaulted children than women who are in adult homosexual relationships have.

In fact, I'l guarantee that.

There are no sexually normal men or women... who molest children.

So, while your attempts to rationalize such and hoped to prove your point through the whimsy of irrational semantics... I can't help ya.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

I'll bet you a thousand dollars right now that more men who are in straight adults relationships have sexually assaulted children than women who are in adult homosexual relationships have.

In fact, I'l guarantee that.

There are no sexually normal men or women... who molest children.

So, while your attempts to rationalize such and hoped to prove your point through the whimsy of irrational semantics... I can't help ya.

I agree, so I have no idea what the rest of your post is going on about.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Child molesters are neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Pedepohiles are attracted to children who are PRE sexual.

Amazes me how many people don't understand that.

Child molesters are always sexually abnormal, which is also the case for homosexuals and pedophiles. And ALL are LEARNED BEHAVIORS... each requiring LOTS of practice.

See how that works? And why its probably a REALLY BAD IDEA TO NORMALIZE IT?

Who's proposing we normalize sexual child abuse?

Who? Oh such is the basis of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality... ONE of the charter organizations of which is NAMBLA... . Also such was the life long ambition of Alfred Kinsey, the founder of the Kinsey Institute... a leading institution in the absurd scientific edict: Homosexuality is normal sexuality. Then there the APA (American Psychiatric Association) who released a white paper which concluded "...some children may actually benefit from a caring sexual relationship with a loving adult.

Of course that's just off the top of my head... And THAT is just here in the US. The list grows exponentially, where one considers the immoral abyss that is Europe.

So you're terrified of NAMBLA convincing everyone it's ok to bugger little children? Get help. Seriously.

No... I'm terrified that you and people LIKE YOU will convince everyone that sexual abnormality is normal... and NAMBLA will accomplish their goal of eliminating the 'Age of consent' thus legalizing the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

I'll bet you a thousand dollars right now that more men who are in straight adults relationships have sexually assaulted children than women who are in adult homosexual relationships have.

In fact, I'l guarantee that.

There are no sexually normal men or women... who molest children.

So, while your attempts to rationalize such and hoped to prove your point through the whimsy of irrational semantics... I can't help ya.

I agree, so I have no idea what the rest of your post is going on about.

Thank you for sharing.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

No I don't. I have two lady friends who are lesbians and now will soon get married because SSM is legal. They've always been trusted with our children and have proven far more moral, modest, and trustworthy than anyone else I know. Maybe I should let them know they're more likely to molest my children than I am.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman... So you're most special friends may get married... but not to each other. This without regard to whatever formal roommate agreement they may enter into in the pretense that their behavior should be legitimized through institutions for which they, as a couple, are otherwise disqualified.


And they both know that they are more likely to molest a child... so while I wouldn't discourage ya from doing so... it's not necessary. (Just be sure to never leave either of them alone with any children... I'd hate to see ya spend the rest of your life regretting foolishness that ya can't take back. That will stick to ya FOREVER!)

Actually they can get married to each other and they will very soon. I can't wait to get the wedding invitation. What are you going to do to stop them? And they have babysat my children for the last decade. And I sure as hell trust them more than I would ever trust somebody like you.

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman. So, well... you know.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.

Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.

That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.

Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.

I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.

Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?

Most porn consumers are heterosexual, that may explain why most child molesters are heterosexual too. Your argument is falling apart faster than Ikea furniture.

Most people are most people... and MOST people are normal people, who recognize that they're not the center of the universe and that THEIR responsibilities which they bear in sustaining their individual rights, sustain the rights of everyone... .

That SOME people are disproportionally responsible for the crime of every nature, points to the ABNORMAL traits intrinsic to those people, not the least of those traits is they reject the responsibilities that sustain their rights and as a result, they tend toward behavior that provides for their needs to be satisfied, such will inevitably come at some expense, to someone else.

Homosexuals are disproportionally responsible for sexual abuse of minors... as are Leftists and the product of Left-think... who are disproportionally responsible for every MANNER of crime, on every level of society.

Now why is that?

That is... because Left-think rests entirely upon Relativism, which axiomatically rejects objectivity, the essential element of truth, trust, morality and justice.

See the problem?

Heterosexuals are objectively dis proportionally in overwhelming numbers for almost all crimes in the world, particularly the males.

Now why is that?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

No... I'm terrified that you and people LIKE YOU will convince everyone that sexual abnormality is normal... and NAMBLA will accomplish their goal of eliminating the 'Age of consent' thus legalizing the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification.

So.....you just confirmed again that you think NAMBLA is going to convince everyone it's ok to bugger children, simultaneously confirming that you're besotted with irrational paranoia and need help...and possibly some strong medication.

The voices in your head are not real.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nether does wherermykeys, Bear.

Excellent job of exposing the wanker.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Now a hundred or so pages back, a mouthier contingent of the Advocacy to Normalize sexual Abnormality was challenged to profess her adherence to or rejection of the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification and WHY. Two dozen pages saw this challenge consistently advanced and consistently ignored.

If you'll go back and read the record of this thread... you'll find that NO OTHER member of the Homo-lobby found ANY means to set themselves distinct from the Adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification... and such has remained consistent to THIS VERY POINT, despite THOUSANDS of opportunity to DO SO.

Now... has it ever occurred to any of you why that might be?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No... I'm terrified that you and people LIKE YOU will convince everyone that sexual abnormality is normal... and NAMBLA will accomplish their goal of eliminating the 'Age of consent' thus legalizing the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification.

So.....you just confirmed again that you think NAMBLA is going to convince everyone it's ok to bugger children, simultaneously confirming that you're besotted with irrational paranoia and need help...and possibly some strong medication.

The voices in your head are not real.

NAMBLA? No... YOU and the cult advocating to normalize sexual abnormality? Very possible... .


Now a hundred or so pages back, a mouthier contingent of the Advocacy to Normalize sexual Abnormality was challenged to profess her adherence to or rejection of the adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification and WHY. Two dozen pages saw this challenge consistently advanced and consistently ignored.

If you'll go back and read the record of this thread... you'll find that NO OTHER member of the Homo-lobby found ANY means to set themselves distinct from the Adult pursuit of children for sexual gratification... and such has remained consistent to THIS VERY POINT, despite THOUSANDS of opportunity to DO SO.

Now... has it ever occurred to any of you why that might be?