should KBJ be removed from SCOTUS for this blatant deviation from the constitution??

[progressive hunter]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

Good luck with that.

 

[TNHarley]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

We all knew she was nothing more than an activist during her nomination. Most likely, the reason the pedo rican picked her in the ifrst place.
I do appreciate this truth from Thomas : Racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism.
Of course, he also stood by the constitution in his opinion. Which is what the decision should have been about.

 

[Marener]

That is indeed how a fascist would think.

Eliminate anyone who disagrees with you.

 

[2aguy]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

She should never have been put on the court....she isn't a judge, she is a leftist clown.

 

[norwegen]

American ideology should align with the Constitution. That's a no-brainer unless you're a lefty.

 

[progressive hunter]

That is indeed how a fascist would think.

Eliminate anyone who disagrees with you.

her job is to uphold the constitution, not rule along ideological lines,,

 

[TNHarley]

That is indeed how a fascist would think.

Eliminate anyone who disagrees with you.

If you dont adhere to the Constitution while being a SCJ, you should be removed from the bench.
Any non-fascist should know that

 

[progressive hunter]

American ideology should align with the Constitution. That's a no-brainer unless you're a lefty.

not true,, people are allowed to have their own opinions,, we are talking about a SCOTUS judge ruling against the constitution in favor of her ideology,,
to me it seems she lied when she took an oath to protect and defend the constitution,,

 

[1srelluc]

I don't know what you would expect from a woman who does not know what a woman is.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She's obviously a product of what SCUTUS ruled against

 

[22lcidw]

That is indeed how a fascist would think.

Eliminate anyone who disagrees with you.

We are not taxed at a few per cent of income in this nation. Taxes have expanded massively since starting huge socially conscious agendas. The politicians are even inflating the economy to get more taxes from us and lower the living standards of those on fixed or closer to fixed incomes.

 

[WEATHER53]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

Dwell in the past and remain unprepared for the present and future
Lib 101

 

[Marener]

If you dont adhere to the Constitution while being a SCJ, you should be removed from the bench.
Any non-fascist should know that

Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?

 

[WEATHER53]

her job is to uphold the constitution, not rule along ideological lines,,

Feelings and wishes over fact and law
Lib 101

 

[WEATHER53]

Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?

The actions make that determination, There is no arbitrary judgement that you falsely suggest

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Blacks aren't failing because of generational racism. They're failing because their average IQ is far below that of any other racial group.

 

[Fueri]

Obama gave us Sotomayor and Biden has appointed this moron. Easily the 2 largest activist morons to sit, possibly ever, on the SC.

Activism > Constitution in their imbecilic minds.

 

[Marener]

The actions make that determination, There is no arbitrary judgement that you falsely suggest

Gibberish.

 

[progressive hunter]

Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?

she admitted it was for ideological reasons dumbass,,
and went against equal protection under the law,,