should KBJ be removed from SCOTUS for this blatant deviation from the constitution??

[progressive hunter]

Blacks aren't failing because of generational racism. They're failing because their average IQ is far below that of any other racial group.

now thats racist,,

 

[Polishprince]

Supreme Court Justices are supposed to be ruling on the Constitution and the law, not ruling based upon what they think that the best policy for the country to follow is.

Jackson was trying to legislate from the bench, and that is wrong as well as a high crime or at least a misdemeanor, which means impeachment no questions asked.

 

[Independent thinker]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

Three Supreme Court justices voted that we should discriminate based on race.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

now thats racist,,

Pi

Three Supreme Court justices voted that we should discriminate based on race.

All three left loons

 

[Marener]

When do we get to remove Alito for his dissent in US v Texas?

 

[progressive hunter]

Three Supreme Court justices voted that we should discriminate based on race.

havent seen what the other ones wrote on it,, but if they said it was for ideological reasons like she did they are in violation of their oaths and should be removed,,,

 

[Marener]

she admitted it was for ideological reasons dumbass,,
and went against equal protection under the law,,

Let’s see it.

 

[progressive hunter]

When do we get to remove Alito for his dissent in US v Texas?

on what grounds??

 

[Marener]

on what grounds??

For blatantly deviating from the constitution.

 

[progressive hunter]

Let’s see it.

its in the OP you stupid fuck,,

 

[progressive hunter]

For blatantly deviating from the constitution.

please explain it to the class,,,,

 

[Marener]

please explain it to the class,,,,

Alito felt they states could dictate how the executive enforced law.

That is clearly against the constitution.

 

[dblack]

Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?

We all do. The Constitution is only as strong as our will to demand that it be followed.

 

[Marener]

its in the OP you stupid fuck,,

I read the OP. There was nothing of the sort in it.

 

[Independent thinker]

havent seen what the other ones wrote on it,, but if they said it was for ideological reasons like she did they are in violation of their oaths and should be removed,,,

Sotomayor wrote some crap ignoring the Constitution. She voted based on her feelings and nothing to do with the law. Surprise, surprise.

 

[JGalt]

That is indeed how a fascist would think.

Eliminate anyone who disagrees with you.

You seem to have a pretty good handle on that. Were you speaking from experience?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.

in my opinion she should resign or be removed.

what say you??


She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.

"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,

Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...

www.theblaze.com

Wasn't the Constitution based on ideology?

If anyone needs to be removed it should be that hypocrite Uncle Thomas.

 

[progressive hunter]

Alito felt they states could dictate how the executive enforced law.

That is clearly against the constitution.

not if the laws are specific in the constitution,,,

that same thing is currently happening in every blue state with children being exposed to adult sexual content and several other laws like sanctuary cities and state,,

sorry but your outrage is misplaced,,, he gave an opinion,,

in this case she openly states constitution be damned and with with her ideology,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Sotomayor wrote some crap ignoring the Constitution. She voted based on her feelings and nothing to do with the law. Surprise, surprise.

Save that Constitution bullshit, if the Constitution was followed folks of color would have never endured the atrocities we have in this country.

 

[TNHarley]

Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?

Well, in this case we can by their actual opinion