Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not at all. Of course they were Liberals, perhaps even "radicals" but I think that's a stretch. The better question is "Do you consider today's Democrats to be the same as the 'Liberals' as our Founders?" I do not. I believe that what passes for "Liberalism" today is a far cry from what our Founders believed since they believed in individuality and Democrats believe in Elitist Authoritarianism.Would it be impolite to point out that the writers of the Constitution were liberals? Even radicals?Ohhhh MORE substantive liberalism.If we were following the constitution barack obama, his tranny husband mike, his lover eric holder and their granny loretta lynch would all be hanging from a tall oak tree.
I don't recall lynching government officials being written into the Constitution of the United States. You must be referring to the Constitution of the KKK. It doesn't apply.
One would think with all of the Republican investigations of all things Obama and Clinton, they would have come up with some actual crimes that the administration committed but 8 years, countless investigations and NOTHING.
You've been drunk so long you've lost touch with reality.
Democrats are the enemies of the Constitution, and of freedom all over the world.
This entire little flatulent exercise is because democrats didn't like the results of the election. That's all it is.
They are human stains and their champions are, ARE, stains, and need to be scrubbed away.
If it makes you feel better, what passes for "Conservatism" today is a far cry from what Barry Goldwater believed since it, too, is very authoritarian and less about individual liberty.
He has no Russian ties, let alone illegal ones. Podesta, Hillary and Slick, on the other hand, have plenty of shady Russian ties.Actually it means that Trump illegal russian ties go back decades.
Russia has been trying to influence our elections since the communists came to power. All you scumbag leftwingers thought we should be buddies with them in those days.
Oh, puhleeze. You snowflakes are getting so desparate.He has no Russian ties, let alone illegal ones. Podesta, Hillary and Slick, on the other hand, have plenty of shady Russian ties.Actually it means that Trump illegal russian ties go back decades.
Really, Trump didn't hold the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow?
with the assistance of the russians.
I'm including on this thread the letter that appointed Muller as special counsel and the scope of Mueller directives stated in that letter.....mindful that Rosenstein IS a Trump appointee.....
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf
Actually it means that Trump illegal russian ties go back decades.
He has no Russian ties, let alone illegal ones. Podesta, Hillary and Slick, on the other hand, have plenty of shady Russian ties.
Oh, puhleeze. You snowflakes are getting so desparate.
Go back to your grade school English teacher and report her for shorting you on an education on how to read English.Not at all. Of course they were Liberals, perhaps even "radicals" but I think that's a stretch. The better question is "Do you consider today's Democrats to be the same as the 'Liberals' as our Founders?" I do not. I believe that what passes for "Liberalism" today is a far cry from what our Founders believed since they believed in individuality and Democrats believe in Elitist Authoritarianism.Would it be impolite to point out that the writers of the Constitution were liberals? Even radicals?Ohhhh MORE substantive liberalism.If we were following the constitution barack obama, his tranny husband mike, his lover eric holder and their granny loretta lynch would all be hanging from a tall oak tree.
I don't recall lynching government officials being written into the Constitution of the United States. You must be referring to the Constitution of the KKK. It doesn't apply.
One would think with all of the Republican investigations of all things Obama and Clinton, they would have come up with some actual crimes that the administration committed but 8 years, countless investigations and NOTHING.
You've been drunk so long you've lost touch with reality.
Democrats are the enemies of the Constitution, and of freedom all over the world.
This entire little flatulent exercise is because democrats didn't like the results of the election. That's all it is.
They are human stains and their champions are, ARE, stains, and need to be scrubbed away.
If it makes you feel better, what passes for "Conservatism" today is a far cry from what Barry Goldwater believed since it, too, is very authoritarian and less about individual liberty.
They were not liberals in the modern sense of the term. To equate the two defies logic. A big government socialist is not the same thing as a small government capitalist, but you're claiming they are the same. Bullshit.
Oh, puhleeze. You snowflakes are getting so desparate.
You are the one who pulled "He has no russian ties" out of your ass. Knowing Trump held a major event in Moscow.
Wow. Are you lying or do you really not understand Trump has business links around the world including Russia?He has no Russian ties, let alone illegal ones. Podesta, Hillary and Slick, on the other hand, have plenty of shady Russian ties.Actually it means that Trump illegal russian ties go back decades.
...well, here's just ONE example as an answer to the thread's title
Just….OBJECTIVELY…..review these THREE statements.
The first is from Donald himself:
Donald Trump was asked by Lester Holt, about whether he or his family “have any accepted investments, any loans” from Russia.
Trump responded, “I have no investments in Russia, none whatsoever. I don’t have property in Russia…. I built a great company, but I’m not involved with Russia.”
(Note the disconnect between the question and the answer. Holt asked about money he may have received from Russia, not investments Trump has made in Russia.
_____________________
So, then we go to what Trump’s sons have stated:
Donald Trump Jr. has already admitted the importance of Russian money to their business ventures. He said publicly in 2008 that "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."
_______________________
Finally the more spacey son, Eric…….
Question: ‘Eric, who’s funding? I know no [U.S.] banks — because of the recession……. have touched a golf course. You know, no one’s funding any kind of golf construction. It’s dead in the water the last four or five years.’
This is how Eric responded, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’
Eric Trump reportedly bragged about Russian funding streams
Trump Jr made that statement more than 9 years ago.
And somehow you think something is wrong with that.
No, no.....not to morons like you......Didn't mean to test your half brain too much; just go back to sleep and all will be better in the morning..
You forgot to quote your source. Here, let me help: Daily KosThe Russian mind ray is not to be underestimated
My anonymous sources state it was applied to almost 14 million voters and had they effect of causing 11 million to pull the lever for Trump instead of Hillary, all of which were in the key swing states
Then the mind ray was applied to females who suddenly thought marching with pussies on their heads was a meaningful display of advocating serious social changes
He's one of those rubes who'd applaud if Trump stood in the middle of 5th avenue and shot somebody.And somehow you think something is wrong with that.
No, no.....not to morons like you......Didn't mean to test your half brain too much; just go back to sleep and all will be better in the morning..
Looks like a Shit Sandwich for TrumpFunny. You're already getting your excuses prepared for when Mewler coughs up a big nothing burger. You're also showing us how Democrats operate. Your error is in believing that everyone thinks like you.Any intelligent leader knows to maintain plausible deniability. Let your underlings do the illegal act with no records implicating the boss. Works for the mob, works in politicsAgreed. Politically, this looks bad. Whether or not it's criminal remains to be seen. It could be criminal, but may not be. Even if it is, it could only implicate Jr and not Daddy.It remains to be seen whether it constitutes a crime or not and if anything implicates TrumpLOL. Excellent and funny turn of phrase. Still, this is a political "shit sandwich", not necessarily a crime. Heck, even if it is a crime, it's more likely to be one involving a fine and censure, not an orange jumpsuit.Hate to break it to you......but your "nothing burger" is actually a shit sandwich
Even under ideal circumstances, it is still a shit sandwich
Key Trump aides and family members are implicated
The STINK of Russian intervention still permiates the Trump White House
I would be surprised if Trump is directly implicated. I would also be surprised if close associates and family members do not have questionable dealings with Russia
I think the real scandal will work out to be Trumps financial dealings with Russia
Is it just wrong in your mind, or do you think it's illegal?
