Should Muller's investigation include Trump's financial history?

[Defiant1]

Is it just wrong in your mind, or do you think it's illegal?

Well, 2/3 of Americans will judge what was posted one way....and the 1/3 within your ilk, another......

We are by now.....by your tacit admission.....BEYOND whether Trump's lies are "wrong".......now you're asking if he broke any laws....and THAT is not my job to judge.....Maybe Mueller's ???

Is there a new lying statute?

 

[WEATHER53]

LOL. Excellent and funny turn of phrase. Still, this is a political "shit sandwich", not necessarily a crime. Heck, even if it is a crime, it's more likely to be one involving a fine and censure, not an orange jumpsuit.

It remains to be seen whether it constitutes a crime or not and if anything implicates Trump
Even under ideal circumstances, it is still a shit sandwich
Key Trump aides and family members are implicated

The STINK of Russian intervention still permiates the Trump White House

Agreed. Politically, this looks bad. Whether or not it's criminal remains to be seen. It could be criminal, but may not be. Even if it is, it could only implicate Jr and not Daddy.

Any intelligent leader knows to maintain plausible deniability. Let your underlings do the illegal act with no records implicating the boss. Works for the mob, works in politics

I would be surprised if Trump is directly implicated. I would also be surprised if close associates and family members do not have questionable dealings with Russia

I think the real scandal will work out to be Trumps financial dealings with Russia

Funny. You're already getting your excuses prepared for when Mewler coughs up a big nothing burger. You're also showing us how Democrats operate. Your error is in believing that everyone thinks like you.

Looks like a Shit Sandwich for Trump

His Presidency reeks of the Stink of Russian intervention

Your comments reek of infantile liberal inability to accept reality. Safe space time out for you

 

[nat4900]

Is there a new lying statute?

Thank you for openly (well, somewhat) admission that the orange piece of lard has and is lying.

 

[Defiant1]

Is there a new lying statute?

Thank you for openly (well, somewhat) admission that the orange piece of lard has and is lying.

I call it negotiating.

 

[OKTexas]

Trump Jr made that statement more than 9 years ago.

Oh, you're "correct"......I forgot that the orange clown stated......

"....well my family DID have Russian money pouring in to our businesses.....but that was 9 years ago..."

Yes, Tex I forgot that little Trumpster statement, right?

Stop quoting me out of context, now why don't your address if Trumps business dealings almost a decade ago are part of Muller's mandate. If you contend it is, quote the portion of the letter authorizing his investigation that covers it. Or you can just admit you have nothing except your own supposition and innuendo.


.

 

[nat4900]

I call it negotiating.

Negotiation with liars or delusional folks are not worth the effort.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are suddenly in favor of government prying into citizens private lives and businesses, shocker.

 

[nat4900]

Stop quoting me out of context, now why don't your address if Trumps business dealings almost a decade ago are part of Muller's mandate. If you contend it is, quote the portion of the letter authorizing his investigation that covers it. Or you can just admit you have nothing except your own supposition and innuendo.

NOT my job to quote ANYTHING for your little brain to discard anyway......You should have no worries, TX...all is good and Trump will be your hero for as long as you remain as much of a dolt as you are now............LOL

 

[Defiant1]

I call it negotiating.

Negotiation with liars or delusional folks are not worth the effort.

He's the President, you don't have a choice.

 

[nat4900]

Liberals are suddenly in favor of government prying into citizens private lives and businesses, shocker.

Actually, no one gives a shit of YOUR porn account, but the president's???? Bit of a different story, don't you think??? ....LOL

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are suddenly in favor of government prying into citizens private lives and businesses, shocker.

Actually, no one gives a shit of YOUR porn account, but the president's???? Bit of a different story, don't you think??? ....LOL

Liberals are filthy scum.

 

[nat4900]

He's the President, you don't have a choice.

Not my choice to have or have not.....Let Trump "negotiate" for his own resignation motive.

 

[OKTexas]

Stop quoting me out of context, now why don't your address if Trumps business dealings almost a decade ago are part of Muller's mandate. If you contend it is, quote the portion of the letter authorizing his investigation that covers it. Or you can just admit you have nothing except your own supposition and innuendo.

NOT my job to quote ANYTHING for your little brain to discard anyway......You should have no worries, TX...all is good and Trump will be your hero for as long as you remain as much of a dolt as you are now............LOL

The fact is Muller's mandate is to complete Comey's investigation, Comey said publicly that Trump was not a target of that investigation. You just keep lying your ass off claiming he somehow was and if Muller goes in the direction you indicate he is going outside his authority and congress should put a stop to it.


.

 

[Defiant1]

He's the President, you don't have a choice.

Not my choice to have or have not.....Let Trump "negotiate" for his own resignation motive.

Why would he resign? He's having too much fun.
Solving problems.
Representing the US.
Making America Great Again!!!!!!!

 

[nat4900]

Why would he resign? He's having too much fun.
Solving problems.
Representing the US.
Making America Great Again!!!!!!!

FRUSTRATED TRUMP……(I’D RATHER BE PLAYING GOLF AND GRABBING PUSSIES)

 

[Siete]

And somehow you think something is wrong with that.

No, no.....not to morons like you......Didn't mean to test your half brain too much; just go back to sleep and all will be better in the morning..

Is it just wrong in your mind, or do you think it's illegal?

make the son of a bitch show his tax returns and find out.

its that simple.

 

[JGalt]

Trump's pre-Presidential business dealings with Russian investors are no concern to me. Hillary and Bill accepted millions from Russian oligarchs and in return, signed over a quarter of our uranium reserves to Putin.

 

[jillian]

...well, here's just ONE example as an answer to the thread's title

Just….OBJECTIVELY…..review these THREE statements.

The first is from Donald himself:

Donald Trump was asked by Lester Holt, about whether he or his family “have any accepted investments, any loans” from Russia.

Trump responded, “I have no investments in Russia, none whatsoever. I don’t have property in Russia…. I built a great company, but I’m not involved with Russia.”
(Note the disconnect between the question and the answer. Holt asked about money he may have received from Russia, not investments Trump has made in Russia.
_____________________

So, then we go to what Trump’s sons have stated:

Donald Trump Jr. has already admitted the importance of Russian money to their business ventures. He said publicly in 2008 that "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."
_______________________

Finally the more spacey son, Eric…….

Question: ‘Eric, who’s funding? I know no [U.S.] banks — because of the recession……. have touched a golf course. You know, no one’s funding any kind of golf construction. It’s dead in the water the last four or five years.’

This is how Eric responded, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’

Eric Trump reportedly bragged about Russian funding streams

And somehow you think something is wrong with that.

trump loons are treasonous freaks

 

[rightwinger]

It remains to be seen whether it constitutes a crime or not and if anything implicates Trump
Even under ideal circumstances, it is still a shit sandwich
Key Trump aides and family members are implicated

The STINK of Russian intervention still permiates the Trump White House

Agreed. Politically, this looks bad. Whether or not it's criminal remains to be seen. It could be criminal, but may not be. Even if it is, it could only implicate Jr and not Daddy.

Any intelligent leader knows to maintain plausible deniability. Let your underlings do the illegal act with no records implicating the boss. Works for the mob, works in politics

I would be surprised if Trump is directly implicated. I would also be surprised if close associates and family members do not have questionable dealings with Russia

I think the real scandal will work out to be Trumps financial dealings with Russia

Funny. You're already getting your excuses prepared for when Mewler coughs up a big nothing burger. You're also showing us how Democrats operate. Your error is in believing that everyone thinks like you.

Looks like a Shit Sandwich for Trump

His Presidency reeks of the Stink of Russian intervention

Your comments reek of infantile liberal inability to accept reality. Safe space time out for you

The Trump administration and his family are under investigation

That is the reality

 

[bripat9643]

I don't recall lynching government officials being written into the Constitution of the United States. You must be referring to the Constitution of the KKK. It doesn't apply.

One would think with all of the Republican investigations of all things Obama and Clinton, they would have come up with some actual crimes that the administration committed but 8 years, countless investigations and NOTHING.

You've been drunk so long you've lost touch with reality.

Ohhhh MORE substantive liberalism.

Democrats are the enemies of the Constitution, and of freedom all over the world.

This entire little flatulent exercise is because democrats didn't like the results of the election. That's all it is.

They are human stains and their champions are, ARE, stains, and need to be scrubbed away.

Would it be impolite to point out that the writers of the Constitution were liberals? Even radicals?

Not at all. Of course they were Liberals, perhaps even "radicals" but I think that's a stretch. The better question is "Do you consider today's Democrats to be the same as the 'Liberals' as our Founders?" I do not. I believe that what passes for "Liberalism" today is a far cry from what our Founders believed since they believed in individuality and Democrats believe in Elitist Authoritarianism.

If it makes you feel better, what passes for "Conservatism" today is a far cry from what Barry Goldwater believed since it, too, is very authoritarian and less about individual liberty.

They were not liberals in the modern sense of the term. To equate the two defies logic. A big government socialist is not the same thing as a small government capitalist, but you're claiming they are the same. Bullshit.

Go back to your grade school English teacher and report her for shorting you on an education on how to read English.

What part of what I posted isn't true?