Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,860
- 19,381
The use of the vehicle constitutes an attack with a deadly weapon.By using deadly force? I'd like to see that code.Citizen's Arrest!Sure. A castle doctrine states that you do not have a duty to retreat in the face of harm or property. She was in the right to protect property when she gave initial chase. Who wouldn't?We're talking about the law.
I thought you people were all about being a nation of laws?
North Carolina favors victims of crime with some pretty lenient castle doctrine laws and such
which is a law in a nation of laws
When she could not catch she then had a duty to call the authorities. Castle doctrine does not mean you can go down the street, around the corner, into the neighborhood bar and shoot the guy/girl.
The moment she chose to get in her care, she made a concious choice not to recover her property, but to do harm to the perp. She was no longer in fear of bodily harm and therefore had no right to escalate the conflict.
A private person may stop and detain another person when the private person has probable cause to believe that the other person has committed in his presence a (1) felony, (2) a breach of the peace, (3) a crime involving physical injury to another person, or (4) a crime involving theft or destruction of property.
was it deadly
Look. You people asked how we would rule. This is how I would rule. I'm not interested in the semantic word games. Wait for the trail and lets see what happens.