Should Republicans who voted for Infrastructure be driven from the party?

[bripat9643]

If I understand you correctly...the argument you are making is that the infrastructure bill will help the country and that might make Democrats more popular so that is why you oppose it?

Nope. The Bill will only help some Democrats. It will harm the rest of us. How will I benefit from paying for other people to get EVs?

 

[Lesh]

Nope. The Bill will only help some Democrats.

You mean Republicans aren't allowed to drive on those roads and bridges?

 

[marvin martian]

You mean Republicans aren't allowed to drive on those roads and bridges?

Which roads and bridges?

 

[bripat9643]

Alabama rep Gary Palmer is taking credit for the infrastructure bill. Why would he do that if it funded democrats?

Because he's a sleazy lying moron.

 

[22lcidw]

You mean Republicans aren't allowed to drive on those roads and bridges?

A minimum of 550 Billion Dollars is needed for Roads and Bridges. The Bill has 110 Billion Dollars earmarked for it.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean Republicans aren't allowed to drive on those roads and bridges?

Not enough to cover the additional taxes we have to pay to cover it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Driven out of the party? No.

Lose their seat to a candidate who doesn't vote for profligate spending that hurts people because of the inflation it creates? Certainly.

 

[Staidhup]

Come on man give them a break, they were elected to bring home the pork!

 

[Anathema]

Is a Republican who supports infrastructure a RINO?
Do they deserve to be driven from the party just because they did what is best for their district and state?

That depends on how you define “infrastructure”. If you define it the way that Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution does, then definitely not. If you define it any other way, then they deserve to be removed from the party completely.

 

[bripat9643]

You think infrastructure is socialist and used as a ploy to hook in voters. When it's brought up that Trump had multiple Infrastructure weeks (often to deflect away from other blunders) you don't have a reply.

You'd think that maybe one would have thought through this before posting.

Trump is utterly irrelevant to this boondoggle. I would probably object to his bill as well, but it didn't reek 1/10 as bad as this pork laden pile of crap.

 

[bripat9643]

That depends on how you define “infrastructure”. If you define it the way that Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution does, then definitely not. If you define it any other way, then they deserve to be removed from the party completely.

Democrats define it as anything that helps Democrats get reelected.

 

[rightwinger]

That depends on how you define “infrastructure”. If you define it the way that Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution does, then definitely not. If you define it any other way, then they deserve to be removed from the party completely.

Are you sure?

I could SWEAR that Article 1 Section 8 talks about Electric Vehicles and Broadband

 

[rightwinger]

It's virtually identical. Nice try.

Really think you can get away with that crap?

The version that was passed was stripped down to pure infrastructure

If you believe otherwise, show what is in THE BILL THAT BIDEN SIGNED that is not infrastructure

 

[rightwinger]

Driven out of the party? No.

Lose their seat to a candidate who doesn't vote for profligate spending that hurts people because of the inflation it creates? Certainly.

A candidate who doesn’t support investing in AMERICA?

 

[bripat9643]

Really think you can get away with that crap?

The version that was passed was stripped down to pure infrastructure

If you believe otherwise, show what is in THE BILL THAT BIDEN SIGNED that is not infrastructure

Hardly. Electric vehicles are not infrastructure. They are consumer goods.

 

[lantern2814]

Brandon is kicking it into high gear
First the economy, now the Infrastructure

LETS GO BRANDON!

Cheering record inflation, tripling of home heating costs, sky high gas prices, empty stores shelves, ships sitting off California for weeks. Of course leftards like you cheer for this. Sane Americans are disgusted with it. By the way, by YOUR statements from the last 4 years, any economic success now is due to Donald Trump not Xiden.

 

[rightwinger]

Cheering record inflation, tripling of home heating costs, sky high gas prices, empty stores shelves, ships sitting off California for weeks. Of course leftards like you cheer for this. Sane Americans are disgusted with it. By the way, by YOUR statements from the last 4 years, any economic success now is due to Donald Trump not Xiden.

Lets see..
A Stock Market UP 23 percent
4 million additional jobs this year
Highest GDP increases in a decade
Wages up 7 percent

LETS GO BRANDON!

 

[Lastamender]

Lets see..
A Stock Market UP 23 percent
4 million additional jobs this year
Highest GDP increases in a decade
Wages up 7 percent

LETS GO BRANDON!

Wait until they legalize incest and you can applaud him again.

 

[Anathema]

Are you sure?

I could SWEAR that Article 1 Section 8 talks about Electric Vehicles and Broadband

I’m quite certain, thanks.

Hell, the Constitution doesn’t even allow the Feds to pay for state or local infrastructure… only FEDERAL infrastructure.

 

[Juicin]

--------------------------------------------
Not any clearer, at all.
But then, it didn't need to be.

It sure seemed pretty doggone clear that ------ that you didn't know that Mitch McConnell had also voted for the bill.
Anyway that's the way my avatar saw it.

This is why they pay me the big bucks, to read