Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Solve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.We need to find out where all this money is going because it isn't going to maintain and improve our country.. Infrastructure and science spending is at its lowest in decades.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
Why pay for an everlasting war, Person on the allegedly Capital right; but, we know that cannot be so since 1929.Solve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.We need to find out where all this money is going because it isn't going to maintain and improve our country.. Infrastructure and science spending is at its lowest in decades.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
It is why we need to solve simple poverty instead of only paying for a war on poverty.Solve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
So by maintaining the poverty level, who are we helping?
We can't be helping the taxpayers because most of them don't want these people on welfare. We're not helping industry who may need physically able bodied people to do work, we can't be helping individuals receiving these assistance programs because there is no advancement being on welfare.
It is why we need to solve simple poverty instead of only paying for a war on poverty.Solve poverty?Which onesEither that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
So by maintaining the poverty level, who are we helping?
We can't be helping the taxpayers because most of them don't want these people on welfare. We're not helping industry who may need physically able bodied people to do work, we can't be helping individuals receiving these assistance programs because there is no advancement being on welfare.
Why do you believe that my good but extreme, socialist sir?It is why we need to solve simple poverty instead of only paying for a war on poverty.Solve poverty?Which ones
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
So by maintaining the poverty level, who are we helping?
We can't be helping the taxpayers because most of them don't want these people on welfare. We're not helping industry who may need physically able bodied people to do work, we can't be helping individuals receiving these assistance programs because there is no advancement being on welfare.
Well we're not going to do that the way we are going. The only way to really solve poverty is to restrict procreation by those who are on it. But few Americans (and even fewer politicians) have the guts to implement such a program.
Solve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.We need to find out where all this money is going because it isn't going to maintain and improve our country.. Infrastructure and science spending is at its lowest in decades.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
Solve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
We help solve it through making it easy to go to college, cutting back on h1b's so they have jobs to fill and raising tariffs in order to compete within our market instead of south asia's.
It is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.Do you take a deduction.....I mean handout on your children as dependents?Why, you gave your manhood to the OP?
How does being born in our society mean you merit handouts?
How about your mortgage handout
It isn't a handout, it's our money.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
It is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.Do you take a deduction.....I mean handout on your children as dependents?
How about your mortgage handout
It isn't a handout, it's our money.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
Are you really that stupid or are you just being a left wing asshole (pardon the redundancy)? Probably both.
Right, comrade, government not taking people's money is "giving" them money. You mentioned that, comrade big guy
In fairness, Corporate Fatcats have benfited from Corporate Welfare for many many years. They always have their hand out. Don't kid yourself thinking otherwise.
Usually liberals by "corporate welfare" mean allowing companies to deduct their expenses. Is that what you mean? Or do you mean something else? I need a better definition.
I also have zero idea what your pulling that out of your ass means that I'm somehow "kidding" myself since it has nothing to do with what I said
Corporate Fatcats and Government are partners in crime. They're not the adversaries you see them as. Our Government can now best be described as a Government/Corporate Complex. Our nation is all about Corporatism now. Businesses are in bed with Government and always have their hands out. It is what it is.
Post after post you write vague crap that doesn't address anything I said while you say I said things I didn't say. If you want to stop being a moron at some point and have an actual conversation I'll be here
Projection.
Welfare benefits need to be reduced to zero. Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Better force people to learn some useful skills so they could find a job.
It is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.It isn't a handout, it's our money.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
Are you really that stupid or are you just being a left wing asshole (pardon the redundancy)? Probably both.
It's always hard to tell with Comrade RW, isn't it? Post after post and he can't address the point made that government not taking our money is not giving us money. He just keeps spewing Marxist rhetoric
It is why i try to resort to the fewest fallacies as an ethic that may be indistinguishable from a moral.It is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
Are you really that stupid or are you just being a left wing asshole (pardon the redundancy)? Probably both.
It's always hard to tell with Comrade RW, isn't it? Post after post and he can't address the point made that government not taking our money is not giving us money. He just keeps spewing Marxist rhetoric
Tell a lie and tell it over and over until it becomes truth.
Most on welfare already work. Republican insistence on low wages ensure they stay on welfareSolve poverty?Which onesHave you seen the social spending on our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror? The Right only complains about income transfers and social spending that may actually benefit least wealthy.
Either that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
So by maintaining the poverty level, who are we helping?
We can't be helping the taxpayers because most of them don't want these people on welfare. We're not helping industry who may need physically able bodied people to do work, we can't be helping individuals receiving these assistance programs because there is no advancement being on welfare.
You have to contribute to society. If you and I both make $80 k a year, why do you keep more of your check because you have a house and kidsIt is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.It isn't a handout, it's our money.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
Are you really that stupid or are you just being a left wing asshole (pardon the redundancy)? Probably both.
It's always hard to tell with Comrade RW, isn't it? Post after post and he can't address the point made that government not taking our money is not giving us money. He just keeps spewing Marxist rhetoric
In fairness, Corporate Fatcats have benfited from Corporate Welfare for many many years. They always have their hand out. Don't kid yourself thinking otherwise.
Usually liberals by "corporate welfare" mean allowing companies to deduct their expenses. Is that what you mean? Or do you mean something else? I need a better definition.
I also have zero idea what your pulling that out of your ass means that I'm somehow "kidding" myself since it has nothing to do with what I said
Corporate Fatcats and Government are partners in crime. They're not the adversaries you see them as. Our Government can now best be described as a Government/Corporate Complex. Our nation is all about Corporatism now. Businesses are in bed with Government and always have their hands out. It is what it is.
Post after post you write vague crap that doesn't address anything I said while you say I said things I didn't say. If you want to stop being a moron at some point and have an actual conversation I'll be here
Projection.
That doesn't even make sense, Polly-tician. You responded to my post. I'm projecting that I responded to yours? I guess when you decided to go playground thinking it through was over your head. You should have just gone with are so, that would have made more sense.
So, I made the point to RW that government not taking our money is not giving us money. A point you haven't addressed. You just came back with that means I support our tax system and I don't know there is corporate welfare.
I asked what you mean by corporate welfare, are you talking about corporations deducting their expenses or something else. A point you haven't addressed, you came back with that corporations and government are both criminals.
When you decide to stop just parroting Marxists, Polly-tician, and engage in an actual discussion where you address my points instead of repeating the rhetoric you memorized, let me know
You have to contribute to society. If you and I both make $80 k a year, why do you keep more of your check because you have a house and kidsIt is EXACTLY the same thingYou writing your children off on your taxes is as much a handout as a welfare mother gets.
Why should others pay to support your children or your mortgage?
How fucking stupid are you exactly? It isn't even close to the same thing. Me getting to keep more of the money I EARNED isn't the same as someone getting money that they DIDN'T EARN.
Educate yourself retard.
Why should you pay lower taxes than someone with no kids? Why should he pay to raise your kids
You are like a welfare mother with society paying to help raise your kids
Freeloader
Are you really that stupid or are you just being a left wing asshole (pardon the redundancy)? Probably both.
It's always hard to tell with Comrade RW, isn't it? Post after post and he can't address the point made that government not taking our money is not giving us money. He just keeps spewing Marxist rhetoric
Jake, Those are the opinions of ultraconservative but either directions they choose there are grave consequences that they seems to ignore.You continue to deflect. The far right reactionary wing, none of the conservatives at all, want the citizens gone so they can loot their property. Trump certainly does by saying families will stay together and go.
That means the citizen infants and children are going. Now you are implying that you don't want to deport citizens. I hope so; that would be a good change for you.
Up until now you and coherent thought do not recognize each other.
You and JimBowie et al. are excellent poster weasels for why most far right reactionary threads are lies.
Realized that they have these I DON'T care attitude.
Deport the parents. I don't care.
Deport us citizens. I don't care.
Place these kids in fema camps, foster. I don't care.
It's inhumane and irresponsible and very costly.
Most on welfare already work. Republican insistence on low wages ensure they stay on welfareSolve poverty?Which onesEither that or all these "programs" that supposedly benefit the least wealthy are all failures.
Just about any welfare program. What have they done when it comes to solving poverty? Very little.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
Months after JFK's assassination, Lyndon Johnson told congress and the nation that he was declaring "an unconditional war on poverty in America." Five decades and $15 trillion later, that war is lost.
Taxpayers have been bilked trillions of dollars.
Back in 1964, America's
poverty rate
was 19 percent. Today, it's 15 percent and the number is rising thanks to failed programs. The government borrowed money and forced taxpayers to spend $15 trillion in anti-poverty programs. However, bureaucrats and politicians have not been held accountable for squandering America's wealth.
War on poverty: US spent $15 trillion over 5 decades
When is welfare supposed to do that? You help people who need helping
So by maintaining the poverty level, who are we helping?
We can't be helping the taxpayers because most of them don't want these people on welfare. We're not helping industry who may need physically able bodied people to do work, we can't be helping individuals receiving these assistance programs because there is no advancement being on welfare.
