Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it's not only enormously popular but Republicans tried to kill IT with no replacement
An had ZERO plan to do thatAnd if they did kill it they would have had to replace it. Trump's promise was repeal and replace, not create a plan to replace something they couldn't repeal in the first place. Don't put step 2 before step 1.
The Republicans have no proposal to address social security.
Yea well...Republicans don't Do thatAnd if they did kill it they would have had to replace it.
An had ZERO plan to do that
www.latimes.com
khn.org
Come on Ray! That's bullshit and you know it. You want the government to pick those professionals that handle your investments instead of you?How's it working now? Apparently not very well. I would rather a professional pick my investments than government taking my money throughout my life and give me a pittance of what I contributed. I've done very well with my IRA by not investing myself and allowing the pros to invest my money for me. When I die my family won't see one penny of all the SS money I contributed, but they will see nearly every dime I invested in my own retirement account.
Nice selective editing of my post. That's a TOS violation, dumbass!Yea well...Republicans don't Do that
Report me CappyNice selective editing of my post. That's a TOS violation, dumbass!
Come on Ray! That's bullshit and you know it. You want the government to pick those professionals that handle your investments instead of you?
No age increases are necessary, because to save SS all the government needs to do is "DEFUND" unnecessary and out of control spending in other areas, and the problem is solved in the short term, then it should work towards fixing the thing like Ray is talking about. Can you believe the failed strategy of "DEFUND THE POLICE", and what that has caused, but when it comes to calling on the Fed's to stop their stupid bull crap of spending or buying votes "CRICKETS".Any change must be phased in - increasing the age would require it as well. That is just a given, it is hard to change programs like this until the fall under their own weight as SS itself proves quite clearly.
They'll never do that Ray, because they don't want the fall out or back lash that would come if a taxpayer makes a claim that he or she was duped by the government who suggested anything.No, just give us a choice of what companies are considered reliable enough trust with our retirement money. I'm sure there are dozens of them.
Chile is a corrupt third world country whose politicians are even more reprehensible than pour own, their oversight agencies are sub parWorked great in Chile huh?
No. It didn't
Just becuase you're too stupid to handle your own money doesn't mean the rest of us areThis thread has made it abundantly clear that Republicans want to KILL Social Security.
And not only do these tards repeat what they're told by pundits and right wing think tanks...GOP politicians listen to creeps like thee AND those pundits and think tanks.
This IS the GOP
Social security is designed to keep people dependent on the governmentI think the only problem (as always) would be the Democrats. They don't want people being independent of government, they want people dependent on government. Just like they did when GW suggested the possibility of people being able to invest 2% of their contributions to their IRA, the Democrats lied about it and fought it tooth and nail.
You don;t need to use investment companies.Boy are those investment companies gonna love that...and the fees they're gonna charge
Instead of the off the books government slush fund that it has become?Exactly how they'll treat social security
Basically you'll say anythingInstead of the off the books government slush fund that it has become?
Bullshit!You know there is no SS Trust Fund do you?
It is mostly IOUs..................Really!!
Social security is designed to keep people dependent on the government
Example here have shown that even using returns below the 50 year averages of the stock market that even a person with a modest income , if he had control of his own and his employers SS contributions could retire wealthy and actually be able to leave a significant inheritance to his familt
They'll never do that Ray, because they don't want the fall out or back lash that would come if a taxpayer makes a claim that he or she was duped by the government who suggested anything.
