Should the United States go back to a top federal tax rate of 70%?

Should the United States go back to a top federal tax rate of 70%?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
 
One would assume those too young to have to been born or have forgotten the era of 70%, will say, it only applies to those super wealthy, yet as history so pointedly disclosed it started for those identified as of considerable wealth and creeped downward to hit everyone. It was the excuse used to cap social security contributions, employ a graduated tax scale, and era of deductions, and demise of the American manufacturing.
But f - - k it, go for it, the lessons of history need to be repeated so the young socialists can get a first hand taste of what their teachers have selectivity taught them and what joy it is to exist in a government controlled state.
 
One would assume those too young to have to been born or have forgotten the era of 70%, will say, it only applies to those super wealthy, yet as history so pointedly disclosed it started for those identified as of considerable wealth and creeped downward to hit everyone. It was the excuse used to cap social security contributions, employ a graduated tax scale, and era of deductions, and demise of the American manufacturing.
But f - - k it, go for it, the lessons of history need to be repeated so the young socialists can get a first hand taste of what their teachers have selectivity taught them and what joy it is to exist in a government controlled state.
the dems just want your money. always have.
 

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!
 
One would assume those too young to have to been born or have forgotten the era of 70%, will say, it only applies to those super wealthy, yet as history so pointedly disclosed it started for those identified as of considerable wealth and creeped downward to hit everyone. It was the excuse used to cap social security contributions, employ a graduated tax scale, and era of deductions, and demise of the American manufacturing.
But f - - k it, go for it, the lessons of history need to be repeated so the young socialists can get a first hand taste of what their teachers have selectivity taught them and what joy it is to exist in a government controlled state.
The last time we had a 70% tax rate families could live and thrive on one person's paycheck.
 
A majority of Americans have two-digit IQs.

Not a majority, but about 62,979,636 of the voting public.

View attachment 240336

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

Hey slick, whatever happened to "stay on topic"?
 
A majority of Americans have two-digit IQs.

Not a majority, but about 62,979,636 of the voting public.

View attachment 240336

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

You brought it up, I bitch slapped you with it.
 
Not a majority, but about 62,979,636 of the voting public.

View attachment 240336

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

Hey slick, whatever happened to "stay on topic"?
I was replying to jwoodie, who replied to the OP.
 
Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

Hey slick, whatever happened to "stay on topic"?
I was replying to jwoodie, who replied to the OP.

You brought it up, I bitch slapped you with it. Stay on topic maybe you'll fare better.
 
Not a majority, but about 62,979,636 of the voting public.

View attachment 240336

Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

You brought it up, I bitch slapped you with it.
No, you were conflating winning in the electoral college to high IQ. Pretty stupid.
 
A poll of most Americans proves that a poll will be found to support whatever anyone wants to support.
 
Losers cry about the rules kid.
Again you can't stay on topic. Adderall?

OOOO, you brought up the Presidential Vote son....you retarded like Timmy?
Hey jwoodie - I found another of those 2 digit IQ people you were talking about!

You brought it up, I bitch slapped you with it.
No, you were conflating winning in the electoral college to high IQ. Pretty stupid.

Stop crying about someone commenting a subject you introduced. No, I equated the EC with being the rules of the game. Are you 12?
 
One would assume those too young to have to been born or have forgotten the era of 70%, will say, it only applies to those super wealthy, yet as history so pointedly disclosed it started for those identified as of considerable wealth and creeped downward to hit everyone. It was the excuse used to cap social security contributions, employ a graduated tax scale, and era of deductions, and demise of the American manufacturing.
But f - - k it, go for it, the lessons of history need to be repeated so the young socialists can get a first hand taste of what their teachers have selectivity taught them and what joy it is to exist in a government controlled state.
The last time we had a 70% tax rate families could live and thrive on one person's paycheck.

well Ladd that is pure bullshit. Most of us scraped by pay check to pay check as our employers started closing shop and or moved off shore. There is no excuse for ignorance! If your now hoping to say it was the roaring 50’s then the hole you have dug is deeper than you can spin your way out of.
 
Socialism, communism, fascism, or collectivism doesn’t work, never has. Living proof, your cell phone, technological and medical advancement, ability to receive just reward for your assumption of risk. To make it simple, the ability to send your child to college to study art history and become a barista.
 

Forum List

Back
Top