🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Should US oil cpompanies who sell their oil outside of the US lose their subsidies?

It's a boondoggle. The company has lots of unused pipeline capacity all over the US. They take out a loan and pocket 10% off the top for walking around money.
You'll excuse us if we don't believe you are competent to run their business.
 
We banned nearly all oil exports from 1975 till 2015. We were still oil dependent every one of those years.......
I'd forgotten that til you posted last week. But my question was ... did it actually reduce the cost of oil and diesel?

What are the main components of the retail price of gasoline?​

The retail price of gasoline includes four main components:

  • The cost of crude oil
  • Refining costs and profits
  • Distribution and marketing costs and profits
  • Taxes

While it may actually cost less to ship East Texas Crude to a refinery in LA or Tex than to ship crude oil from the Gulf or somewhere else, DOES that mean the REFINER pays less? I honestly don't know.

But I doubt it makes much different in the cost at the pump. Even if Refiners have to pay a couple of bucks a barrel less for crude, the other three costs would be identical for any oil.
 
Gas prices by President 2004- Present:


Bush -$2.55
Obama - $3.00
Trump - $2.48
Biden - $3.01

Which Party pushes policy more friendly to US Domestic Oil?
 
I'd forgotten that til you posted last week. But my question was ... did it actually reduce the cost of oil and diesel?

What are the main components of the retail price of gasoline?​

The retail price of gasoline includes four main components:

  • The cost of crude oil
  • Refining costs and profits
  • Distribution and marketing costs and profits
  • Taxes

While it may actually cost less to ship East Texas Crude to a refinery in LA or Tex than to ship crude oil from the Gulf or somewhere else, DOES that mean the REFINER pays less? I honestly don't know.

But I doubt it makes much different in the cost at the pump. Even if Refiners have to pay a couple of bucks a barrel less for crude, the other three costs would be identical for any oil.
I don't think it did, nor did it reduce our dependence on foreign oil. By 2005-06 we were importing 13+mbd and only producing about 7mbd.
 
We didn't ban anything.
Holy fucking shit, Batman!

We ban all kind of things.


"Lawmakers are close to authorizing oil exports as part of a broader $1.1 trillion spending and tax bill working its way through Congress. Sources told CNN the compromise measure, which is needed to avert a government shutdown, includes a provision that would roll back the export restriction.

The oil export ban was signed into law in 1975, part of the reaction to an OPEC embargo that created a shortage of crude and slammed the American economy with skyrocketing prices."
 
Who said anything about them sourcing it from oversees. I am talking about oil drilled in the US. Almost all of it is exported. If more of it was sold in the US, it could help lower gas prices. But the companies choose to export because they can make more money selling it oversees than domestically. And if they make that choice, they shouldn't receive tax subsidies.

Sorry, but I think you have it wrong.
It has always been illegal to sell US drilled oil outside the US.
The oil the US exports comes from places like Canada usually.
There are a few instances where domestic oil can legally be exported, but only when it is more convenient and as an exchange for imported oil.

There are oil subsidies, but they mostly are from cheap land leases and tax exemptions.
The government does not give them any money.
But I personally do favor federal land oil nationalization and a socialist oil company created.
Almost every oil producing country does that, to reduce domestic prices to customers.
 
Oil Production under each president paints a different picture. The long slide ended with Bush the Younger, Obama' first term began a long surge upwards that continued in the Trump term until the Covid slump hit.

Obama ran saying “Energy prices must necessarily rise”. Biden ran saying “It’s time to reign in the oil companies”. Clearly, the Democrat Party does not push policy friendly to oil companies. Supporters should accept this rather than make excuses for their impact on domestic oil prices.

 
Oil Production under each president paints a different picture. The long slide ended with Bush the Younger, Obama' first term began a long surge upwards that continued in the Trump term until the Covid slump hit.

And the production increases in the US coincided with higher worldwide cost of oil per barrel and NOT with which party got itself elected to the WH
 
Obama ran saying “Energy prices must necessarily rise”. Biden ran saying “It’s time to reign in the oil companies”. Clearly, the Democrat Party does not push policy friendly to oil companies. Supporters should accept this rather than make excuses for their impact on domestic oil prices.

Lol 😂😂😂 if the price per barrel hadn't gone up, oil companies would NOT have invested in production. That's how the business works.
 
Lol 😂😂😂 if the price per barrel hadn't gone up, oil companies would NOT have invested in production. That's how the business works.
You keep skirting the core issue that Government regulation impacts the oil industry as well as any other industry which ultimately are reflected in price. Democrat Policies are not friendly to US Oil Companies.
 
You keep skirting the core issue that Government regulation impacts the oil industry as well as any other industry which ultimately are reflected in price. Democrat Policies are not friendly to US Oil Companies.
Not much. The US isn't very concerned about the environment.... not like other countries. We're pretty light on regulations. We have no economies of scale and most US wells produce less than 50 barrels a day so there's lots of double and triple handling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top