Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
The CBO is a Marxist organization. They've always been wrong.Here are the CBO numbers from 2016.
The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2016 to 2026 | Congressional Budget Office
From the link:
"In 2016, the federal budget deficit will increase, in relation to the size of the economy, for the first time since 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimates. If current laws generally remained unchanged, the deficit would grow over the next 10 years, and by 2026 it would be considerably larger than its average over the past 50 years, CBO projects. Debt held by the public would also grow significantly from its already high level."
Trump may have contributed to our fiscal problem but there were structural issues in place before he was ever elected.
Of course there are "structural problems." Democracy is designed to implode.The CBO is a Marxist organization. They've always been wrong.Here are the CBO numbers from 2016.
The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2016 to 2026 | Congressional Budget Office
From the link:
"In 2016, the federal budget deficit will increase, in relation to the size of the economy, for the first time since 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimates. If current laws generally remained unchanged, the deficit would grow over the next 10 years, and by 2026 it would be considerably larger than its average over the past 50 years, CBO projects. Debt held by the public would also grow significantly from its already high level."
Trump may have contributed to our fiscal problem but there were structural issues in place before he was ever elected.
Marxist? That made me laugh.
Regardless, do you deny that there were structural fiscal problems that preceded Trump? Can you back up that assertion?
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
When you say defense is "the biggest," you mean only when you breakdown social spending into their individual programs. The increase in social spending in the aggregate was much larger than defense spending.
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
When you say defense is "the biggest," you mean only when you breakdown social spending into their individual programs. The increase in social spending in the aggregate was much larger than defense spending.
What were the other increases then? Military got the biggest increase according to the video. You have a link?
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
When you say defense is "the biggest," you mean only when you breakdown social spending into their individual programs. The increase in social spending in the aggregate was much larger than defense spending.
What were the other increases then? Military got the biggest increase according to the video. You have a link?
What I posted doesn't contradict what you posted.
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
When you say defense is "the biggest," you mean only when you breakdown social spending into their individual programs. The increase in social spending in the aggregate was much larger than defense spending.
What were the other increases then? Military got the biggest increase according to the video. You have a link?
What I posted doesn't contradict what you posted.
Yes was just hoping for more numbers. Social spending should probably be broken down as well everybody pays into social security so I think it's a different monster than some other spending.
This video clearly shows what happened. Revenue nearly flat and the biggest increases in spending were military and interest on the debt:
When you say defense is "the biggest," you mean only when you breakdown social spending into their individual programs. The increase in social spending in the aggregate was much larger than defense spending.
What were the other increases then? Military got the biggest increase according to the video. You have a link?
What I posted doesn't contradict what you posted.
Yes was just hoping for more numbers. Social spending should probably be broken down as well everybody pays into social security so I think it's a different monster than some other spending.
AND, it lets you pretend that Military spending, is the big problem, even though we all know that is not true.
Yes our problems should have been fixed. Bush not only was bad for deficits, but handed over a poor economy too. And then Obama spent us out of a recession and I mean really spent. And now trump has taken the deficits that had finally decreased a bit under Obama and ballooned them up like we are in recession....When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
It was easier for Gingrich
Which is something we should have probably continued. I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.
I have to admit, I was miffed when Trump decided to increase military in exchange for big increases in social spending and not building the wall. The later would have cut the deficit by at least $200 billion.Which is something we should have probably continued. I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.
China could bring us to our knees just by selling our debt in the open markets, driving up our interest rates to the point where "interest expense" is 90% of federal revenue.
Those who are not concerned with the Federal Debt are mathematically challenged morons and leeches addicted to government checks, many of whom are BOTH....
Ask anyone unconcerned with the debt what happens if interest rates rise, and you'll get a big fat
DUHHHHHHHH
They should have been coming to an agreement on how much to cut, not how much to spend. We were over 20 trillion in debt afterall.I have to admit, I was miffed when Trump decided to increase military in exchange for big increases in social spending and not building the wall. The later would have cut the deficit by at least $200 billion.Which is something we should have probably continued. I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
No politician ever got reelected by cutting spending.They should have been coming to an agreement on how much to cut, not how much to spend. We were over 20 trillion in debt afterall.I have to admit, I was miffed when Trump decided to increase military in exchange for big increases in social spending and not building the wall. The later would have cut the deficit by at least $200 billion.Which is something we should have probably continued. I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
No politician ever got reelected by cutting spending.They should have been coming to an agreement on how much to cut, not how much to spend. We were over 20 trillion in debt afterall.I have to admit, I was miffed when Trump decided to increase military in exchange for big increases in social spending and not building the wall. The later would have cut the deficit by at least $200 billion.Which is something we should have probably continued. I'm 100% certain we will collapse economically before anyone is foolish enough to attack us.It was easier for Gingrich because after the Berlin Wall came down we cut military spending every year.When W was elected, we had a budget surplus and a Federal debt of under $6 trillion....
All W had to do was do what Newt Gingrich did.... and our debt would still be $6 trillion...
but that would have been good for America, and W was never about what was good for America.....
W was about what was good for Israel and Zionist Jews like Mikey Bloomberg, Jeff Epstein, and the rest who were invested on 910 to profit from 911....
