Should Welfare be a Disqualification for Voting?

[P@triot]

YOU don't get to decipher the constitution all on your own.

see how that works

There is nothing to "decipher" you stupid ****. The U.S. Constitution is written in black & white and says exactly what it says. Only a Dumbocrat could believe that a clearly written legal document needs to be "deciphered"...

then tell us all dicklips why people like you don't agree with the experts and expect the rest of us to listen to you instead?

because your a two bit idiot who is willing to allow your party to cheat you love this country so much huh

You're babbling incoherently. Did you run out of your meds? Sweetie, the only one's cheating in elections are Dumbocrats and you know it. Conservatives are dying for voter ID to ensure fair, clean elections. Dumbocrats oppose it. Nothing more needs to be said.

And who are these "experts" you are referring to?!? ThinkProgress?

 

[Truthmatters]

so you just FLAT OUT DENY that court case went to the SCOTUS last year huh?


see why your party is failing?


if you cant deal with the facts yopur worthless to this country

 

[Truthmatters]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


this happened.


Nothing you can say or do will make it disappear.

You either discuss it or admit you have no respect for FACTS

 

[Redfish]

There is nothing to "decipher" you stupid ****. The U.S. Constitution is written in black & white and says exactly what it says. Only a Dumbocrat could believe that a clearly written legal document needs to be "deciphered"...

then tell us all dicklips why people like you don't agree with the experts and expect the rest of us to listen to you instead?

because your a two bit idiot who is willing to allow your party to cheat you love this country so much huh

You're babbling incoherently. Did you run out of your meds? Sweetie, the only Inez's cheating in elections are Dumbocrats and you know it. Conservatives are dying for voter ID to ensure fair, clean elections. Dumbocrats oppose it. Nothing more needs to be said.

And who are these "experts" you are referring to?!? ThinkProgress?

Rotty, you are wasting your time with her. She is an idiot. Put her on ignore, report her to the mods for spamming threads, she needs to be banned permanently.

 

[Truthmatters]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times


this is not babble

this is FACT


Your party cheats

they have to to win


because the American people prefer the democratic approach

 

[Truthmatters]

then tell us all dicklips why people like you don't agree with the experts and expect the rest of us to listen to you instead?

because your a two bit idiot who is willing to allow your party to cheat you love this country so much huh

You're babbling incoherently. Did you run out of your meds? Sweetie, the only Inez's cheating in elections are Dumbocrats and you know it. Conservatives are dying for voter ID to ensure fair, clean elections. Dumbocrats oppose it. Nothing more needs to be said.

And who are these "experts" you are referring to?!? ThinkProgress?

Rotty, you are wasting your time with her. She is an idiot. Put her on ignore, report her to the mods for spamming threads, she needs to be banned permanently.

This is a thread about voting.



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times



that is what Im talking about.

You just cant incorporate those facts into your world view.


that makes your world view invalid

 

[percysunshine]

I must have 'nobody' on ignore. I can't see the posts of Truthmatter's debate opponent.

 

[Truthmatters]

now watch them all run away like little pussies to AVIOD court documented FACTS that prove their party has to cheat voters to win power

 

[Truthmatters]

I must have 'nobody' on ignore. I can't see the posts of Truthmatter's debate opponent.

because nobody in your party can refute these facts.



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

 

[Redfish]

I must have 'nobody' on ignore. I can't see the posts of Truthmatter's debate opponent.

 

[Truthmatters]

you people see facts you don't like

so you try to bully the person who is giving you the facts you don't like.


You are all CHIRSTYS


you bully and bivolate and HIDE for facts and then LIE about what your hiding from.


this country will NOT join you in your hate of FACTS

 

[percysunshine]

I must have 'nobody' on ignore. I can't see the posts of Truthmatter's debate opponent.

because nobody in your party can refute these facts.

Well heck, do you have nobodys cell phone number so we can call and ask why he isn't posting?

 

[NYcarbineer]

yes you really are as smart as a cockroaches ass for coming to a political chat site and hiding from people by using ignore.

you are just that fucking stupid


you cant handle the real facts so you hide from them.


that makes you fact adverse and lacking in all the facts.

bad information in means


BAD decisions out.

your a huge loser

Says the miserable **** who couldn't deal with reps so she removed them from her account.

Here's the reality LiesMatters - people are tired of your lies, they are tired of your uneducated, uninformed opinion, and they are tired of your partisan insanity. You bring absolutely nothing to the table here except to push lies in support of communism.

I'm lucky I have the irony meter that goes up to 11, or I'd be out one handy implement.

 

[P@triot]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

this happened.

Nothing you can say or do will make it disappear.

You either discuss it or admit you have no respect for FACTS

This is truly amazing. You're barking about the fact the Supreme Court won't let the RNC try to stop voter fraud?!? And you're proud of that fact and you believe it's a black eye for the RNC?!? My God you are one unhinged broad [MENTION=5217]Truthmatters[/MENTION]. Sweetie, you are proving that the voter fraud exists and that Dumbocrats are blocking the Republican's from stopping it. How dumb are you?!? Do you even read an article before posting it?!?

Here sweetie, let me help you...

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

 

[Truthmatters]

wow you don't understand that case at all.

go get an adult like your 5th grade teacher to explain it to you

 

[Truthmatters]

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114




The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”
The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

 

[P@triot]

yes you really are as smart as a cockroaches ass for coming to a political chat site and hiding from people by using ignore.

you are just that fucking stupid

you cant handle the real facts so you hide from them.

that makes you fact adverse and lacking in all the facts.

bad information in means

BAD decisions out.

your a huge loser

Says the miserable **** who couldn't deal with reps so she removed them from her account.

Here's the reality LiesMatters - people are tired of your lies, they are tired of your uneducated, uninformed opinion, and they are tired of your partisan insanity. You bring absolutely nothing to the table here except to push lies in support of communism.

I'm lucky I have the irony meter that goes up to 11, or I'd be out one handy implement.

There's no "irony" there stupid - I fill this board with links that confirm everything I've said. You and LiesMatters have nothing but uninformed opinion stemming from a fucked up and brainwashed ideology. And that's why you have no links in your posts - just snarky comments which are 100% inaccurate.

 

[P@triot]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”
The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

So again, you're so profoundly stupid, you're actually crowing that the RNC's attempt to prevent voter fraud is a form of "voter fraud"...

Folks - this is a special kind of stupid here!

 

[P@triot]

wow you don't understand that case at all.

go get an adult like your 5th grade teacher to explain it to you

Sweetie, it's in black and white. Apparently you can't read. You're proud of the fact that your party is blocking the RNC from preventing voter fraud...

No wonder you're a jobless parasite. You're too dumb to function in society...

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting

(Maybe a different color will help stupid here understand?!? )

 

[P@triot]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”
The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

You seem to be all turned on over the words "racial" and "ethnic". Why? Trying to end voter fraud is great. And if "racial" or "ethnic" populations weren't engaging in voter fraud, they would have nothing to worry about or complain about.

You really are a special kind of stupid, aren't you LiesMatters?