Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, attacks on Bill Clinton are justified.Why? Because several months back Hillary stated she would put Bill in charge of revitalizing the economy. So yes, he should not be immune from ridicule or political attacks from patriotic Americans like myself.Link?There has already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Actually it's your claim, McRacist. Burden of proof is YOURS. Yours and Jim Hoft.And rotsa ruck wit dat.
Remind us all what Bill Clinton is running for while you're at it.
Dumb shit.
Actually, attacks on Bill Clinton are justified.Why? Because several months back Hillary stated she would put Bill in charge of revitalizing the economy. So yes, he should not be immune from ridicule and political attacks from patriotic Americans like myself.Link?There has already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Actually it's your claim, McRacist. Burden of proof is YOURS. Yours and Jim Hoft.And rotsa ruck wit dat.
Remind us all what Bill Clinton is running for while you're at it.
Dumb shit.
Video: Hillary Clinton Says Bill Will Revitalize the Economy
Actually, attacks on Bill Clinton are justified.Why? Because several months back Hillary stated she would put Bill in charge of revitalizing the economy. So yes, he should not be immune from ridicule and political attacks from patriotic Americans like myself.Link?There has already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Actually it's your claim, McRacist. Burden of proof is YOURS. Yours and Jim Hoft.And rotsa ruck wit dat.
Remind us all what Bill Clinton is running for while you're at it.
Dumb shit.
Video: Hillary Clinton Says Bill Will Revitalize the Economy
upward inflection?free speech?
justice?
DNA to prove either way?
abuse by hillary?
Not the best link. It says the testing was inconclusive. It did say that such a test could exclude Clinton, not that it had. A real test would require two samples, which haven't. Een provided as of yet.Then providing verifiable links should prove no trouble...There has already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Not a problem. Here's one from the Washington Post................
Danney Williams is not Bill Clinton’s son, no matter what Matt Drudge tells you
danny will find another way. maybe he will get a show on trump tv.
Sorry pipsqueak, I never claimed I made a political attack. You seem to have readingActually, attacks on Bill Clinton are justified.Why? Because several months back Hillary stated she would put Bill in charge of revitalizing the economy. So yes, he should not be immune from ridicule and political attacks from patriotic Americans like myself.Link?I don't remember, has there already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Actually it's your claim, McRacist. Burden of proof is YOURS. Yours and Jim Hoft.And rotsa ruck wit dat.
Remind us all what Bill Clinton is running for while you're at it.
Dumb shit.
Video: Hillary Clinton Says Bill Will Revitalize the Economy
You didn't even make a "political attack" Stupid. You parroted a 24-year-old internet myth that's been taken to the cleaners years ago. And then you excised the word "alleged" from Jim Hoft's headline to make it a point-blank assertion. And again, that puts the onus on YOU. Moreover even if you could demonstrate it to be factual it's got zippo to do with politics anyway.
Dumbass.
The article says "But there was not a match. “Not even close," Star said at the time. The first test rendered a second unnecessary." Check and mateNot the best link. It says the testing was inconclusive. It did say that such a test could exclude Clinton, not that it had. A real test would require two samples, which haven't. Een provided as of yet.
did you think this through? you are dumb. obviously. no way to sugarcoat it.danny will find another way. maybe he will get a show on trump tv.
He's not black enough for Oprah?
did you think this through? you are dumb. obviously. no way to sugarcoat it.danny will find another way. maybe he will get a show on trump tv.
He's not black enough for Oprah?
no, YOU failed. and so did your face. it's. lol. deplorable self identifies.did you think this through? you are dumb. obviously. no way to sugarcoat it.danny will find another way. maybe he will get a show on trump tv.
He's not black enough for Oprah?
Oh I thought it through to it's logical and race baiting end.
It's you who have failed to pick up on the nuance.
Actually, attacks on Bill Clinton are justified.Why? Because several months back Hillary stated she would put Bill in charge of revitalizing the economy. So yes, he should not be immune from ridicule and political attacks from patriotic Americans like myself.Link?There has already been a DNA test, and it's been proven that this kid isn't Clinton's.
Can you get a new conspiracy please?
Actually it's your claim, McRacist. Burden of proof is YOURS. Yours and Jim Hoft.And rotsa ruck wit dat.
Remind us all what Bill Clinton is running for while you're at it.
Dumb shit.
Video: Hillary Clinton Says Bill Will Revitalize the Economy
Hey............even though Bill lied about having sex with Lewinsky (which made me not like or trust him), he WAS a fairly decent president, and the economy did pretty decent under his leadership.
Putting him in charge of revitalizing the economy sounds like a decent plan.
no, YOU failed. and so did your face. it's. lol. deplorable self identifies.did you think this through? you are dumb. obviously. no way to sugarcoat it.danny will find another way. maybe he will get a show on trump tv.
He's not black enough for Oprah?
Oh I thought it through to it's logical and race baiting end.
It's you who have failed to pick up on the nuance.
The Clinton's probably had the sample tainted.The article says "But there was not a match. “Not even close," Star said at the time. The first test rendered a second unnecessary." Check and mateNot the best link. It says the testing was inconclusive. It did say that such a test could exclude Clinton, not that it had. A real test would require two samples, which haven't. Een provided as of yet.