Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s not how our criminal justice works. First you need a crime. What is it?Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!Witch-hunt is and always will be a witch-huntI'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I agree that you will consider this a witch-hunt even if there is evidence against Trump.
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
I'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!Witch-hunt is and always will be a witch-huntI'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I agree that you will consider this a witch-hunt even if there is evidence against Trump.
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
I'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I'll disregard it right now. Hows that? Mueller Wiseman Comey were part of the original deep state coup' insurance policy in case Beast lost.
Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!Witch-hunt is and always will be a witch-huntI'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I agree that you will consider this a witch-hunt even if there is evidence against Trump.
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Innocent? Of what? Can’t be innocent without a crimeThis poll is flawed. I don't know if I will accept it or not.
In a very real way, the people of United States will be the jury in this case. Meuller will present his evidence (case) and we will decide whether it a strong case or not. It is that simple. One thing is for sure, it is past time for Meuller to report on Trump's part (or lack) of this whole thing. We are at the point where we are told that the case cant be discussed with Congress (the reps of the people), but there is no issue discussing it with Buzzfead, the NYT or other reporters. I find it outrageous. The case is being fought in the press with disinformation on both sides.
I don't know what Trump did or didn't do.
But, consider this. What if he is innocent? It is possible his entire first term will be destroyed by untrue allegations and rumors. This is not the early 1970s. We have social media and online media. Many outlets today would not even be considered serious news outlets back then. Things have gotten way out of control.
Now, Trump has played his part in this as well. He has helped foster this adversarial relationship. The Press vs Trump mentality. Look at the mess we have.
However, that is not relevant to the Russia Investigation. If Trump did something nefarious, the time has come to make the case. If not, it is time to let Trump move forward as President. He was elected and already half the first term has been clouded by this issue. If he did something that warrants action. Congress will then have to act.
If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!Witch-hunt is and always will be a witch-hunt
I agree that you will consider this a witch-hunt even if there is evidence against Trump.
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
I'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I'll disregard it right now. Hows that? Mueller Wiseman Comey were part of the original deep state coup' insurance policy in case Beast lost.
What could possibly happen that would cause you to NOT disregard it?
If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!I agree that you will consider this a witch-hunt even if there is evidence against Trump.
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
I'm not sure if Mueller is going to have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump. But I trust Mueller to come up with a detailed report with evidence either way. And I'll accept what he concludes, either way.
Are there any Trump supporters who can say the same? I guarantee you guys will beat your chest if he's found innocent, and you'll disregard what Mueller says if it doesn't go Trump's way.
I'll disregard it right now. Hows that? Mueller Wiseman Comey were part of the original deep state coup' insurance policy in case Beast lost.
What could possibly happen that would cause you to NOT disregard it?
A real Felony. A recording. Troopers haul Trump off for rape? Something real.
Not an answer...Name the crime...."Links" isn't a crime.If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?Russia Russia! Nadda, made up. Give me the crime!
If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
Ask your representative.
Once again, Mueller's appointment received bipartisan support. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, etc. supported his appointment to investigate these links to the Russian government.
Not an answer...Name the crime...."Links" isn't a crime.If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?If there's a crime, it will be detailed in the report. Until then, we're not going to know for sure.
"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
Ask your representative.
Once again, Mueller's appointment received bipartisan support. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, etc. supported his appointment to investigate these links to the Russian government.
Another non-answer...."Bipartisan support" isn't an answer either.How am I supposed to know?
What I do know is that there was enough questionable activity that lead to bipartisan support for Mueller to investigate.
You don't have to like that. But that's what happened.
A trump supporter actually says libs never tell the truth ?? Proof they are all rowing with one oar in the waterLiberals never tell the whole truth and sometimes lie totally. So no.Well its a simple enough question, and the poll is simple so....go ahead, respond. you know you want to..
Another non-answer...."Bipartisan support" isn't an answer either.How am I supposed to know?
What I do know is that there was enough questionable activity that lead to bipartisan support for Mueller to investigate.
You don't have to like that. But that's what happened.
What specific criminal act is being investigated?...If there's not a criminal act, then there's no lawful call for a criminal investigation.....Any thing else is more apropos of the Stasi.
An election is questionable activity? No. You made up made up a fantasy naw no crime. Even you can’t name one. Me dossier/ warrantsNot an answer...Name the crime...."Links" isn't a crime.If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?"If" there was a crime? WTH? 3 years of FBI-Mueller investigations! DJT appointed 2 lifetime judges, another one on deathbed? And you wait on paperwork? They would be negligent not to stop him as soon as they found any real "crime". Not sme bullcrap charge "he told Cohen to lie". That is not a crime anyway. That is he-said she-said.
Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
Ask your representative.
Once again, Mueller's appointment received bipartisan support. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, etc. supported his appointment to investigate these links to the Russian government.
How am I supposed to know?
What I do know is that there was enough questionable activity that lead to bipartisan support for Mueller to investigate.
You don't have to like that. But that's what happened.
An election is questionable activity? No. You list made up made up a fantasy naw no crime. Even you can’t name one. Me dossier/ warrantsNot an answer...Name the crime...."Links" isn't a crime.If there’s no crime why the investigation? What are they looking for?Not sure what you're even arguing. If there is a crime, then it will be detailed in the report. This isn't complicated and I don't see what possible issue you can have with that.
Ask your representative.
Once again, Mueller's appointment received bipartisan support. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, etc. supported his appointment to investigate these links to the Russian government.
How am I supposed to know?
What I do know is that there was enough questionable activity that lead to bipartisan support for Mueller to investigate.
You don't have to like that. But that's what happened.
