Since percents and per capita are NOT valid?

[bgrouse]

LOL it does that you retard.

No it does not.

It includes all the population of a group in the measurement. There is only one way to accurately measure crime, take the number of crimes and the number of people of each race committing those crimes and leave the rest out. Per capita doesn't do that. .Do you understand fool? No. Because you don't want to. You keep lying to yourself and what you fail to understand that as long as you deny the larger problem you whites have with crime, the greater the chance is you get done by another white. So stay stupid if you want to.

Per capita is the percent of the population in question in relation to the over all stat being reported on you RETARD. the black race in America is 13 percent of the total population and per capita tells us the percent of blacks that commit a set crime it does not relate to the percent of blacks until the two are compared but when 50 percent of murder is committed by blacks and only 13 percent of the population is black we have a fucking problem, a major problem. When 30 percent of violent crime is committed by 13 percent of the population we have a MAJOR problem fuckwad. Per capita tells us how many people in the population considered are doing the event reported on.

When whites commit 7 out of every ten crimes that's the problem.

But they don't dumb ass and actually since 70 percent of the Country is white that means the right percent of the population is doing the crime per capita. Meanwhile Blacks commit 30 percent of violent crime which is a MUCH higher percent per population then whites and we haven't even factored in the Hispanics.

Hahaha. But as a tourist from outside the country would you be more concerned about the Caucasians committing 70% of the crime?
That 30% commited by blacks would seem less frightening considering the odds.

As a tourist, I'd stay away from negrohoods, since that is where the criminals are concentrated. In other words, if I had to pick where to be, whether in a town of 100 whites or a town of 100 blacks (which is realistically what you'd have to do, it's not like a tourist will visit every single part of the USA), I'd pick the town with 100 whites, since it would have fewer criminals.

As a person trying to run a country, I'd want a white population, since I'd get more good citizens per bad citizen. I can live with 99 white people who have to chip in and lock up/keep imprisoned the 1 bad white. I don't know if I can run a country where 30 blacks have to lock up and keep in prison 70 blacks. I suspect I'd have a failed state, kind of like Haiti and other black countries. Too few intelligent people per capita to run a modern civilization.

 

[IM2]

Since the board black racists insist per capita and percent of population is not valid they must agree this story is a lie right? Black Unemployment 86% Higher Than White

There are no black racists here. You white racists need to understand that your every defense from the fact you are the most violent criminals in this nation by number cannot be defended by per capita.

Per capital is not a defense, dipshit. It simply puts the issue of negro violence in proper context.

Now I'm going out for a walk in my neighborhood without the slightest fear of getting shot.

It is a defense only whites of your ilk use. And you only use it to ignore the larger problem of white crime and violence in America.

Name that white neighborhood anywhere in America where whites gun one another down in the streets a la black hoods everywhere.

And do us the favor of holding your breath while trying to come up with it.

We just saw 17 whites get gunned down in a white neighborhood in Florida.

 

[IM2]

Per capita is the percent of the population in question in relation to the over all stat being reported on you RETARD. the black race in America is 13 percent of the total population and per capita tells us the percent of blacks that commit a set crime it does not relate to the percent of blacks until the two are compared but when 50 percent of murder is committed by blacks and only 13 percent of the population is black we have a fucking problem, a major problem. When 30 percent of violent crime is committed by 13 percent of the population we have a MAJOR problem fuckwad. Per capita tells us how many people in the population considered are doing the event reported on.

It helps clue us in which race is a net drain on society: blacks.

Nag it would be whites since policies by whites actually reduced the potential his nation has.

Is that why black-run and black-populated countries have the lowest per capita GDP in the world? Because of all their wonderful policies?
List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita - Wikipedia

Go study the history and current politics of those countries then come back and ask questions.

Historically, you shitskins were living decades, often centuries behind the whites when colonization happened. Then whites colonized you and taught you a few tricks. When the whites left, your countries started to fall apart.

No it does not.

It includes all the population of a group in the measurement. There is only one way to accurately measure crime, take the number of crimes and the number of people of each race committing those crimes and leave the rest out. Per capita doesn't do that. .Do you understand fool? No. Because you don't want to. You keep lying to yourself and what you fail to understand that as long as you deny the larger problem you whites have with crime, the greater the chance is you get done by another white. So stay stupid if you want to.

Per capita is the percent of the population in question in relation to the over all stat being reported on you RETARD. the black race in America is 13 percent of the total population and per capita tells us the percent of blacks that commit a set crime it does not relate to the percent of blacks until the two are compared but when 50 percent of murder is committed by blacks and only 13 percent of the population is black we have a fucking problem, a major problem. When 30 percent of violent crime is committed by 13 percent of the population we have a MAJOR problem fuckwad. Per capita tells us how many people in the population considered are doing the event reported on.

When whites commit 7 out of every ten crimes that's the problem.

You mean like speeding? Yeah, that's a big problem! Much bigger than murder and other violent crimes in which shitskins excel!

No. Your crime problem is much larger than that white boy.Whites commit more rapes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, vandalism, arson, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, crimes against property, violent crime, forgery, counterfeiting, buying, receiving selling and possessing stolen property, illegal weapons possession, prostitution, commercialized vice, sex offenses, drug violations, drunk driving, offenses involving family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, drunkenness, vagrancy, curfew and loitering, and all other offenses excluding traffic, disorderly conduct and suspicion.

That's what the UCR shows and what's worse for you is that's what it shows every single year.

Whites are the majority (by a significant margin), so of course they will commit the majority of some crime. The issue is that shitskins like you commit more than what one would expect to be your share of the crime. If 100 whites commit 5 violent crimes and 1 shitskin commits 4 violent crimes, there's a bigger problem with the average shitskin than with the average white, even though the whites committed more violent crime in total.

None of this is true. Go study then come back and talk.

 

[IM2]

There are no black racists here. You white racists need to understand that your every defense from the fact you are the most violent criminals in this nation by number cannot be defended by per capita.

There are more unemployed white people that unemployed black people.


By your past "logic" that means that blacks are not discriminated against in hiring.

.LOL! Wrong. There continues to be proven instances of wits discriminating against blacks in employment determined by the courts

But more whites are unemployed that blacks. By your past logic, that proves that whites are the ones discriminated against.

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

 

[Correll]

There are more unemployed white people that unemployed black people.


By your past "logic" that means that blacks are not discriminated against in hiring.

.LOL! Wrong. There continues to be proven instances of wits discriminating against blacks in employment determined by the courts

But more whites are unemployed that blacks. By your past logic, that proves that whites are the ones discriminated against.

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

 

[IM2]

.LOL! Wrong. There continues to be proven instances of wits discriminating against blacks in employment determined by the courts

But more whites are unemployed that blacks. By your past logic, that proves that whites are the ones discriminated against.

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk about math.

 

[Correll]

But more whites are unemployed that blacks. By your past logic, that proves that whites are the ones discriminated against.

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

But more whites are unemployed that blacks. By your past logic, that proves that whites are the ones discriminated against.

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk about math.

You have exactly two supporters both black one as stupid as you are on math and the other claiming the FBI lied.

 

[IM2]

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

 

[Correll]

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

By your own words whites MUST be discriminated against since so many are unemployed. Many more then blacks Hispanics or Asians since all you use is raw numbers then this proves whites are being discriminated against..

 

[IM2]

Well. If Whites are being discriminated against it isn't blacks who are doing it.

Do you share IM2 understanding of math?

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk about math.

You have exactly two supporters both black one as stupid as you are on math and the other claiming the FBI lied.

I didn't come here looking for supporters and I am sure no one else does. Except you racists. Because you seem to think that if enough of you repeat the wrong answer somehow changes it to the right answer.

 

[Correll]

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

By your own words whites MUST be discriminated against since so many are unemployed. Many more then blacks Hispanics or Asians since all you use is raw numbers then this proves whites are being discriminated against..

That's exactly the logic he used to dismiss the academic study proving massive and widespread discrimination against white applicants in Ivy League admissions.


He knows if he explains something using proportional arguments, that we will throw it in his face the next time he tries to play dumb to avoid a similar point.


Thus, he CAN'T answer the question.

 

[IM2]

My math skills that are far better than yours have nothing to do with the fact ha you cannot produce the government policy of racial discrimination against whites.

Its funny how you idiots all repeat the same thing. Can't you think for yourself?

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge

 

[Correll]

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge

The unemployment stats do that already using your math and logic.

 

[IM2]

Anyone who talks with you, about any issue of substance, would notice your complete lack of understanding of grade school math. Early grade school.


That's why we all say the same thing. Because it is where most discussions with you lead.



Those who don't call you on your math idiocy? They are the ones who are racist. THey don't think you can do any better.

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

By your own words whites MUST be discriminated against since so many are unemployed. Many more then blacks Hispanics or Asians since all you use is raw numbers then this proves whites are being discriminated against..

That's exactly the logic he used to dismiss the academic study proving massive and widespread discrimination against white applicants in Ivy League admissions.


He knows if he explains something using proportional arguments, that we will throw it in his face the next time he tries to play dumb to avoid a similar point.


Thus, he CAN'T answer the question.

I can answer the question but you can't answer my question ad you've avoided dong so for 8 months.

Whites are numerical majorities in every category of jobs. .

 

[IM2]

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.

So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge

The unemployment stats do that already using your math and logic.

Whites are numerical majorities in every category of jobs. .

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

By your own words whites MUST be discriminated against since so many are unemployed. Many more then blacks Hispanics or Asians since all you use is raw numbers then this proves whites are being discriminated against..

That's exactly the logic he used to dismiss the academic study proving massive and widespread discrimination against white applicants in Ivy League admissions.


He knows if he explains something using proportional arguments, that we will throw it in his face the next time he tries to play dumb to avoid a similar point.


Thus, he CAN'T answer the question.

I can answer the question but you can't answer my question ad you've avoided dong so for 8 months.

Whites are numerical majorities in every category of jobs. .

Already answered using your math and claims the unemployment statistics PROVE whites are discriminated against since so mnay of them are unemployed.

 

[Correll]

Those who have the ability to talk about substance seem to agree with me. Only you no intelligence racists talk abut math.

That math you dismiss describes reality.


Without it, you are just a delusional fool spouting nosense.


I made a point about unemployment, based on the "math" you have put forth in the past.


There are more whites on unemployment than blacks. By your logic, and understanding of math, that must mean that they are discriminated against.


Explain why that is not so.


You won't do that though, because doing so would also demonstrate that all those times you dismissed proportional numbers, that you were just pretending to be that stupid to avoid admitting the truth.


I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.


You can't do it.


I await your dishonest and vile dodge.

No correll it doesn't prove anything. So when you can show me the national policy of racial discrimination against whites that you were asked to show starting last july, we can talk about your so called challenge.

By your own words whites MUST be discriminated against since so many are unemployed. Many more then blacks Hispanics or Asians since all you use is raw numbers then this proves whites are being discriminated against..

That's exactly the logic he used to dismiss the academic study proving massive and widespread discrimination against white applicants in Ivy League admissions.


He knows if he explains something using proportional arguments, that we will throw it in his face the next time he tries to play dumb to avoid a similar point.


Thus, he CAN'T answer the question.

I can answer the question but you can't answer my question ad you've avoided dong so for 8 months.

Whites are numerical majorities in every category of jobs. .

I answered it repeatedly as you well know.



I repeat my challenge to you,

explain why the larger numbers of whites on unemployment does not prove anti-white discrimination in hiring.